Java 7 Synchronized方法似乎允许多线程访问

时间:2013-11-27 21:18:19

标签: java multithreading synchronized

我在Java 7应用程序上实现Synchronized接口时遇到问题。我认为问题可能在于我正在使用在synchronized方法中写入的静态最终数组来实例化多个对象。似乎线程没有确认监视器?我是否可以做我正在尝试做的事情,或者我是否需要某种具有数组和writeIndex增量器的缓冲区对象? (如果有帮助,代码位于https://github.com/dschaper/CS112_Dan_Schaper/tree/master/Week14/Labs并且这不是作业,这只是一个非分级实验室。)

public class SingleDice extends Dice implements Runnable {
    String threadName;
    private static final int[] valuesArray = new int[9];
    private static int writeIndex = 0;

    public SingleDice(String tName) {
        super(1);
        threadName = tName;
    }

    public synchronized void add(int value) {
        int pos = writeIndex;
        System.out.printf("%s starting sync add(%d), writeIndex = %d\n",
            Thread.currentThread().getName(), value,
            writeIndex);
        valuesArray[pos] = value;
        System.out.printf("%s wrote %d to index %d\n",        
            Thread.currentThread().getName(), value, writeIndex);
        ++writeIndex;
        System.out.printf("Next writeIndex %d\n", writeIndex);
    }
    @Override
    public void run() {
    for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
        add(super.Throw());
        }
    }
}

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;

public class SyncDiceExecutor {

public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("Creating newCachedThreadPool");
    SingleDice SD1 = new SingleDice("SD1");
    SingleDice SD2 = new SingleDice("SD2");
    SingleDice SD3 = new SingleDice("SD3");
    ExecutorService executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
    executor.execute(SD1);
    System.out.printf("Starting Thread SD1 %s\n", executor.toString());
    executor.execute(SD2);
    System.out.printf("Starting Thread SD2 %s\n", executor.toString());
    executor.execute(SD3);
    System.out.printf("Starting Thread SD3 %s\n", executor.toString());
    executor.shutdown();
    System.out.printf("Execeutor shutdown called: %s\n", executor.toString());

    }
}

输出

Creating newCachedThreadPool
Starting Thread SD1 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@544ec1[Running, pool size = 1, active threads = 1, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
pool-1-thread-1 starting sync add(4), writeIndex = 0
pool-1-thread-2 starting sync add(4), writeIndex = 0
Starting Thread SD2 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@544ec1[Running, pool size = 2, active threads = 2, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
pool-1-thread-2 wrote 4 to index 0
pool-1-thread-1 wrote 4 to index 0
pool-1-thread-3 starting sync add(4), writeIndex = 1
Next writeIndex 1
pool-1-thread-2 starting sync add(6), writeIndex = 2
Starting Thread SD3 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@544ec1[Running, pool size = 3, active threads = 3, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
pool-1-thread-2 wrote 6 to index 2
Next writeIndex 3
pool-1-thread-3 wrote 4 to index 2
Next writeIndex 4
Next writeIndex 2
pool-1-thread-3 starting sync add(1), writeIndex = 4
pool-1-thread-2 starting sync add(6), writeIndex = 3
Execeutor shutdown called: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@544ec1[Shutting down, pool size = 3, active threads = 3, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0]
pool-1-thread-2 wrote 6 to index 4
Next writeIndex 5
pool-1-thread-3 wrote 1 to index 4
Next writeIndex 6
pool-1-thread-1 starting sync add(3), writeIndex = 4
pool-1-thread-3 starting sync add(1), writeIndex = 6
pool-1-thread-1 wrote 3 to index 6
pool-1-thread-3 wrote 1 to index 6
Next writeIndex 8
Next writeIndex 7
pool-1-thread-1 starting sync add(1), writeIndex = 8
pool-1-thread-1 wrote 1 to index 8
Next writeIndex 9

Process finished with exit code 0

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:5)

SD1,SD2和SD3是不同的对象,即它们不共享同一个监视器。每个对象都有自己的监视器。如果要在所有实例之间共享监视器,可以使用synchronized(SingleDice.class){...}。

答案 1 :(得分:1)

非静态方法上的synchronizedthis上同步,因此如果您有不同的对象,则它们不是互斥的。如果你不能使用静态方法(在类上进行同步),解决方法是添加静态锁定对象并对其进行同步以保护静态数据。

static final Object valueArrayLock = new Object();

...

// inside a method
synchronized(valueArrayLock) {
    // operate on valueArray
}

注意,如果需要在静态方法中锁定它,请使用相同的静态锁定对象,而不是使静态方法同步(或者查看关于使用类对象进行锁定的其他答案)。