我遇到了两个似乎有相同结果的查询:在分区上应用聚合函数。
我想知道这两个查询之间是否有任何区别:
SELECT empno,
deptno,
sal,
MIN(sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) "Lowest",
MAX(sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) "Highest"
FROM empl
SELECT empno,
deptno,
sal,
MIN(sal) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) "Lowest",
MAX(sal) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) "Highest"
FROM empl
第一个版本更合乎逻辑,但第二个版本可能是某种特殊情况,也许是一些性能优化。
答案 0 :(得分:24)
MIN(sal) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno)
该陈述可以(从大致)从右到左的顺序来考虑:
OVER (PARTITION BY deptno)
表示将行划分为deptno
的不同组;然后ORDER BY sal
表示,对于每个分区,按sal
排序行(隐式使用ASC
结束顺序);然后KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST
表示为每个分区的有序行提供(连续)排名(对于排序列具有相同值的行将被赋予相同的排名)并丢弃所有未排在第一位的行;最后MIN(sal)
表示每个分区的剩余行,返回最低工资。在这种情况下,MIN
和DENSE_RANK FIRST
都在sal
列上运行,因此会执行相同的操作,KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal)
也是多余的。
但是,如果您使用不同的列作为最小值,那么您可以看到效果:
Oracle 11g R2架构设置:
CREATE TABLE test (name, sal, deptno) AS
SELECT 'a', 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'b', 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'c', 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'd', 2, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'e', 3, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'f', 3, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'g', 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'h', 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'i', 5, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'j', 5, 2 FROM DUAL;
查询1 :
SELECT DISTINCT
MIN(sal) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS min_sal_first_sal,
MAX(sal) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS max_sal_first_sal,
MIN(name) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS min_name_first_sal,
MAX(name) KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS max_name_first_sal,
MIN(name) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS min_name_last_sal,
MAX(name) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY sal) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) AS max_name_last_sal,
deptno
FROM test
<强> Results 强>:
| MIN_SAL_FIRST_SAL | MAX_SAL_FIRST_SAL | MIN_NAME_FIRST_SAL | MAX_NAME_FIRST_SAL | MIN_NAME_LAST_SAL | MAX_NAME_LAST_SAL | DEPTNO |
|-------------------|-------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-------------------|-------------------|--------|
| 1 | 1 | a | c | e | f | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | g | h | i | j | 2 |
答案 1 :(得分:3)
在您的示例中,没有区别,因为您的聚合位于您要排序的同一列上。 “KEEP”的实际点/功能是在不同的列上进行聚合和排序时。例如(从另一个答案中借用“测试”表)......
SELECT deptno, min(name) keep ( dense_rank first order by sal desc, name ) ,
max(sal)
FROM test
group by deptno
此查询获取每个部门中薪水最高的人的姓名。考虑没有“KEEP”子句的替代方案:
SELECT deptno, name, sal
FROM test t
WHERE not exists ( SELECT 'person with higher salary in same department'
FROM test t2
WHERE t2.deptno = t.deptno
and (( t2.sal > t.sal )
OR ( t2.sal = t.sal AND t2.name < t.name ) ) )
KEEP子句更容易,更有效(在这个简单的例子中,只有3个一致的获得,而34个获得替代)。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
要详细说明@ MT0答案中提到的一种区别: 在您的第一个查询中,聚合函数MIN和MAX在完成任务, 而在第二秒中,实际的行将由FIRST,LAST和KEEP进行选择。
在第二个示例中,您甚至可以用MIN代替MAX,它将仍然给出正确的答案(最高薪水)。
有关更多信息,请参阅以下 article。
答案 3 :(得分:-1)
如果您根据两列进行排序并获取其中一列或两列,也会有所帮助。
CREATE TABLE test (name, sal, deptno) AS
SELECT 'adam', 100, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'bravo', 500, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'coy', 456, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'david', 50, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'ethan', 50, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 'feral', 300, 1 FROM DUAL;
现在您要选择薪水最低的员工以及人员的薪水。条件是,如果两名员工具有相同的最低薪水,则按名称首先按字母顺序获取一名员工。
select o.deptno
,min(o.sal) keep
(dense_rank first order by o.sal, o.name) least_salary
,min(o.name) keep
(dense_rank first order by o.sal, o.name) least_salary_person
from test o
group by
o.deptno;
输出:
DEPTNO LEAST_SALARY LEAST_SALARY_PERSON
1 50 david
答案 4 :(得分:-2)
此查询获取每个部门中薪水最高的人的姓名。
select MIN(ename),sal,deptno
from emp where sal in
(
select max(sal) from emp group by deptno
)
GROUP BY sal,deptno;