我有类别列表:
╔════╦═════════════╦═════════════╗
║ Id ║ Name ║ Parent_id ║
╠════╬═════════════╬═════════════╣
║ 1 ║ Sports ║ 0 ║
║ 2 ║ Balls ║ 1 ║
║ 3 ║ Shoes ║ 1 ║
║ 4 ║ Electronics ║ 0 ║
║ 5 ║ Cameras ║ 4 ║
║ 6 ║ Lenses ║ 5 ║
║ 7 ║ Tripod ║ 5 ║
║ 8 ║ Computers ║ 4 ║
║ 9 ║ Laptops ║ 8 ║
║ 10 ║ Empty ║ 0 ║
║ -1 ║ Broken ║ 999 ║
╚════╩═════════════╩═════════════╝
每个类别都有父母。当父级为0时 - 这意味着它是根类别。
将最好的方式转换为如下所示的树结构是什么?
换句话说 - 如何从这个结构中提取数据:
class category
{
public int Id;
public int ParentId;
public string Name;
}
进入这一个:
class category
{
public int Id;
public int ParentId;
public string Name;
public List<Category> Subcategories;
}
普遍吗? //通用不仅意味着提到的类。
你有一些聪明的想法吗? ;)
数据:
var categories = new List<category>() {
new category(1, "Sport", 0),
new category(2, "Balls", 1),
new category(3, "Shoes", 1),
new category(4, "Electronics", 0),
new category(5, "Cameras", 4),
new category(6, "Lenses", 5),
new category(7, "Tripod", 5),
new category(8, "Computers", 4),
new category(9, "Laptops", 8),
new category(10, "Empty", 0),
new category(-1, "Broken", 999),
};
答案 0 :(得分:35)
如果您想要通用方法,则需要额外的课程:
public class TreeItem<T>
{
public T Item { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<TreeItem<T>> Children { get; set; }
}
然后将它与此助手一起使用:
internal static class GenericHelpers
{
/// <summary>
/// Generates tree of items from item list
/// </summary>
///
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of item in collection</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="K">Type of parent_id</typeparam>
///
/// <param name="collection">Collection of items</param>
/// <param name="id_selector">Function extracting item's id</param>
/// <param name="parent_id_selector">Function extracting item's parent_id</param>
/// <param name="root_id">Root element id</param>
///
/// <returns>Tree of items</returns>
public static IEnumerable<TreeItem<T>> GenerateTree<T, K>(
this IEnumerable<T> collection,
Func<T, K> id_selector,
Func<T, K> parent_id_selector,
K root_id = default(K))
{
foreach (var c in collection.Where(c => parent_id_selector(c).Equals(root_id)))
{
yield return new TreeItem<T>
{
Item = c,
Children = collection.GenerateTree(id_selector, parent_id_selector, id_selector(c))
};
}
}
}
使用方法:
var root = categories.GenerateTree(c => c.Id, c => c.ParentId);
测试:
static void Test(IEnumerable<TreeItem<category>> categories, int deep = 0)
{
foreach (var c in categories)
{
Console.WriteLine(new String('\t', deep) + c.Item.Name);
Test(c.Children, deep + 1);
}
}
// ...
Test(root);
输出
Sport
Balls
Shoes
Electronics
Cameras
Lenses
Tripod
Computers
Laptops
Empty
答案 1 :(得分:19)
foreach (var cat in categories)
{
cat.Subcategories = categories.Where(child => child.ParentId == cat.Id)
.ToList();
}
您将获得O(n*n)
复杂性。
更优化的方法是使用查找表:
var childsHash = categories.ToLookup(cat => cat.ParentId);
foreach (var cat in categories)
{
cat.Subcategories = childsHash[cat.Id].ToList();
}
为您提供O(2*n)
≈O(n)
结果,您将拥有下一个结构(从LinqPad中显示):
答案 2 :(得分:5)
通过另一种方式传递如何识别父代。完整代码(包括ITree
和xUnit
测试的内部实现)可以在Gist
的位置找到:Nice & universal way to convert List of items to Tree
用法:
ITree<Category> tree = categories.ToTree((parent, child) => child.ParentId == parent.Id);
产品:
<ROOT>
-Sports
--Balls
--Shoes
-Electronics
--Cameras
---Lenses
---Tripod
--Computers
---Laptops
-Empty
-Broken
通用树节点接口:
public interface ITree<T>
{
T Data { get; }
ITree<T> Parent { get; }
ICollection<ITree<T>> Children { get; }
bool IsRoot { get; }
bool IsLeaf { get; }
int Level { get; }
}
扩展的收集方法:
public static ITree<T> ToTree<T>(this IList<T> items, Func<T, T, bool> parentSelector)
{
if (items == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(items));
var lookup = items.ToLookup(
item => items.FirstOrDefault(parent => parentSelector(parent, item)),
child => child);
return Tree<T>.FromLookup(lookup);
}
答案 3 :(得分:3)
您可以使用以下数据库查询来获取具有父子关系的类别列表:
WITH tree (categoryId, parentId, level, categoryName, rn) as
(
SELECT categoryId, parentid, 0 as level, categoryName,
convert(varchar(max),right(row_number() over (order by categoryId),10)) rn
FROM Categories
WHERE parentid = 0
UNION ALL
SELECT c2.categoryId, c2.parentid, tree.level + 1, c2.categoryName,
rn + '/' + convert(varchar(max),right(row_number() over
(order by tree.categoryId),10))
FROM Categories c2
INNER JOIN tree ON tree.categoryId = c2.parentid
)
SELECT *
FROM tree
order by RN
我希望这会帮助你。
答案 4 :(得分:1)
这是我掀起的一个小例子。它非常“通用”。
也可以通过定义接口(然后允许简化函数参数)来制定通用方法 - 但是,我选择不这样做。在任何情况下,“mapper”和选择器函数都允许它在不同的类型中工作。
另请注意,这是不一个非常有效的实现(因为它保留所有子树的所有可能的子节点并重复迭代这样),但可能适合于给定的任务。在过去,我也使用了Dictionary<key,collection>
方法,它有更好的界限,但我不喜欢这样写:)
这是“LINQPad C#程序”。享受!
// F - flat type
// H - hiearchial type
IEnumerable<H> MakeHierarchy<F,H>(
// Remaining items to process
IEnumerable<F> flat,
// Current "parent" to look for
object parentKey,
// Find key for given F-type
Func<F,object> key,
// Convert between types
Func<F,IEnumerable<H>,H> mapper,
// Should this be added as immediate child?
Func<F,object,bool> isImmediateChild) {
var remainder = flat.Where(f => !isImmediateChild(f, parentKey))
.ToList();
return flat
.Where(f => isImmediateChild(f, parentKey))
.Select(f => {
var children = MakeHierarchy(remainder, key(f), key, mapper, isImmediateChild);
return mapper(f, children);
});
}
class category1
{
public int Id;
public int ParentId;
public string Name;
public category1(int id, string name, int parentId) {
Id = id;
Name = name;
ParentId = parentId;
}
};
class category2
{
public int Id;
public int ParentId;
public string Name;
public IEnumerable<category2> Subcategories;
};
List<category1> categories = new List<category1>() {
new category1(1, "Sport", 0),
new category1(2, "Balls", 1),
new category1(3, "Shoes", 1),
new category1(4, "Electronics", 0),
new category1(5, "Cameras", 4),
new category1(6, "Lenses", 5),
new category1(7, "Tripod", 5),
new category1(8, "Computers", 4),
new category1(9, "Laptops", 8),
new category1(10, "Empty", 0),
new category1(-1, "Broken", 999),
};
object KeyForCategory (category1 c1) {
return c1.Id;
}
category2 MapCategories (category1 c1, IEnumerable<category2> subs) {
return new category2 {
Id = c1.Id,
Name = c1.Name,
ParentId = c1.ParentId,
Subcategories = subs,
};
}
bool IsImmediateChild (category1 c1, object id) {
return c1.ParentId.Equals(id);
}
void Main()
{
var h = MakeHierarchy<category1,category2>(categories, 0,
// These make it "Generic". You can use lambdas or whatever;
// here I am using method groups.
KeyForCategory, MapCategories, IsImmediateChild);
h.Dump();
}
答案 5 :(得分:1)
使用 Ilya Ivanov 算法(见上文),我使该方法更通用。
public static IEnumerable<TJ> GenerateTree<T, TK, TJ>(this IEnumerable<T> items,
Func<T, TK> idSelector,
Func<T, TK> parentSelector,
Func<T, IEnumerable<T>, TJ> outSelector)
{
IList<T> mlist = items.ToList();
ILookup<TK, T> mcl = mlist.ToLookup(parentSelector);
return mlist.Select(cat => outSelector(cat, mcl[idSelector(cat)]));
}
用法:
IEnumerable<Category> mlc = GenerateTree(categories,
c => c.Id,
c => c.ParentId,
(c, ci) => new Category
{
Id = c.Id,
Name = c.Name,
ParentId = c.ParentId ,
Subcategories = ci
});
答案 6 :(得分:0)
使用 Ilya Ivanov 和 Damian Drygiel 解决方案,我编写了一些代码,该代码使一棵树具有任何集合和任何级别的子代,即使您确实不喜欢不知道什么节点将是根。
树节点条目
public sealed class TreeNode<T, TKey>
{
public T Item { get; set; }
public TKey ParentId { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<TreeNode<T, TKey>> Children { get; set; }
}
扩展方法
public static class EnumerableExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<TreeNode<T, TKey>> ToTree<T, TKey>(
this IList<T> collection,
Func<T, TKey> itemIdSelector,
Func<T, TKey> parentIdSelector)
{
var rootNodes = new List<TreeNode<T, TKey>>();
var collectionHash = collection.ToLookup(parentIdSelector);
//find root nodes
var parentIds = collection.Select(parentIdSelector);
var itemIds = collection.Select(itemIdSelector);
var rootIds = parentIds.Except(itemIds);
foreach (var rootId in rootIds)
{
rootNodes.AddRange(
GetTreeNodes(
itemIdSelector,
collectionHash,
rootId)
);
}
return rootNodes;
}
private static IEnumerable<TreeNode<T, TKey>> GetTreeNodes<T, TKey>(
Func<T, TKey> itemIdSelector,
ILookup<TKey, T> collectionHash,
TKey parentId)
{
return collectionHash[parentId].Select(collectionItem => new TreeNode<T, TKey>
{
ParentId = parentId,
Item = collectionItem,
Children = GetTreeNodes(
itemIdSelector,
collectionHash,
itemIdSelector(collectionItem))
});
}
}
示例:
var collection = new List<TestTreeItem>
{
new TestTreeItem {Id = 1, Name = "1", ParentId = 14},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 2, Name = "2", ParentId = 0},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 3, Name = "3", ParentId = 1},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 4, Name = "4", ParentId = 1},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 5, Name = "5", ParentId = 2},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 6, Name = "6", ParentId = 2},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 7, Name = "7", ParentId = 3},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 8, Name = "8", ParentId = 3},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 9, Name = "9", ParentId = 5},
new TestTreeItem {Id = 10, Name = "10", ParentId = 7}
};
var tree = collection.ToTree(item => item.Id, item => item.ParentId);
希望,它可以帮助某人。享受
答案 7 :(得分:0)
还有更简单的解决方案:
无需在内存中创建新的节点对象。我们在源列表中已经有对象。只需正确填写Children
。
Node
类可以作为其他逻辑单元的基础。 Path
看起来像1.1
,1.2.1
,2
等。
您可以相应地使用Path
和ParentPath
来代替Id
和ParentId
public abstract class Node
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Path { get; set; }
public string ParentPath
{
get
{
var lastDotPosition = Path.LastIndexOf('.');
return lastDotPosition == -1 ? null : Path.Substring(0, lastDotPosition );
}
}
public IEnumerable<Node> Children { get; set; }
}
递归扩展方法:
public static class TreeExtension
{
public static IEnumerable<T> GenerateTree<T>(this IEnumerable<T> table, T rootNode) where T : Node
{
var organizationalNodes = table.ToList();
var rootNodes = organizationalNodes.Where(node => node.ParentPath == rootNode?.Path).ToList();
foreach (var node in rootNodes)
{
node.Children = organizationalNodes.GenerateTree(node);
}
return rootNodes;
}
}
用法:
public class RegionNode : Node
{
public string timezone {get; set;}
}
从数据库获取表并生成树:
var result = await _context.GetItemsAsync<RegionNode>();
return result.GenerateTree( null);
答案 8 :(得分:0)
我更喜欢使用接口而不是创建新的通用树类型。 所以我将更改 Damian Drygiel 对此代码的回答:
public interface ITreeItem<T>
{
IEnumerable<T> Children { get; set; }
}
public static IEnumerable<T> GenerateTree<T, K>(
this IEnumerable<T> collection,
Func<T, K> id_selector,
Func<T, K> parent_id_selector,
K root_id = default(K)) where T :ITreeItem<T>
{
foreach (var c in collection.Where(c => EqualityComparer<K>.Default.Equals(parent_id_selector(c), root_id)))
{
c.Children = collection.GenerateTree(id_selector, parent_id_selector, id_selector(c));
yield return c;
}
}
和类别将是这样的:
class category :ITree<category>
{
public int Id;
public int ParentId;
public string Name;
public IEnumerable<category> Children;
}
答案 9 :(得分:-1)
您查看数据模型:
public class PricesViewModel
{
public List<PriceType> PriceTypes { get; set; }// List OF Items with Parent ID
public static string Data { get; set; } = ""; // Printed Items
public static List<int> IDs { get; set; }// IDs of Your List To filters
public static void Print(List<PriceType> categories, int deep = 0)
{
foreach (var c in categories)
{
if (PricesViewModel.IDs.Count(x => x == c.ID) > 0)// if Item not taken
{
for (int i = 0; i < deep; i++)// Get Spasece
{
PricesViewModel.Data += " ";
//Console.Wirte(" ");
}
PricesViewModel.Data += "<p>" +c.Name + "</p>"; //Save Items to Print
//Console.WirteLine(c.Name);
if (PricesViewModel.IDs.Count(x => x == c.ID) != 0)
{
PricesViewModel.IDs.Remove(c.ID);//Filter Of IDs List
if (c.PriceTypes.Count != 0)
Print(c.PriceTypes.ToList(), deep + 1);
}
}
}
}
}
测试您的代码:
PricesViewModel obj = new PricesViewModel();
obj.PriceTypes = db.PriceTypes.Include(x => x.PriceTypes).Include(x => x.priceType).Include(x => x.Prices).ToList();//GenerateTree(c => c.ID, c => c.TypeID);
PricesViewModel.IDs = obj.PriceTypes.Select(x=>x.ID).ToList();
PricesViewModel.Data = "";
PricesViewModel.Print(obj.PriceTypes);