我已经在调试模式下编译了一些测试代码,并用ILSpy反映了生成的程序集。这是我得到的IL:
.class private auto ansi beforefieldinit ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program
extends [mscorlib]System.Object
{
// Nested Types
.class nested public auto ansi beforefieldinit Point
extends [mscorlib]System.Object
{
// Fields
.field public int32 x
.field public int32 y
// Methods
.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor () cil managed
{
// Method begins at RVA 0x209f
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack 8
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]System.Object::.ctor()
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method Point::.ctor
} // end of class Point
// Methods
.method private hidebysig static
void Main (
string[] args
) cil managed
{
// Method begins at RVA 0x2050
// Code size 59 (0x3b)
.maxstack 2
.entrypoint
.locals init (
[0] class [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList list,
[1] int32 i,
[2] class ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program/Point p
)
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::.ctor()
IL_0006: stloc.0
IL_0007: ldloc.0
IL_0008: ldc.i4.1
IL_0009: box [mscorlib]System.Int32
IL_000e: callvirt instance int32 [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::Add(object)
IL_0013: pop
IL_0014: ldloc.0
IL_0015: ldc.i4.0
IL_0016: callvirt instance object [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::get_Item(int32)
IL_001b: unbox.any [mscorlib]System.Int32
IL_0020: stloc.1
IL_0021: ldloc.0
IL_0022: newobj instance void ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program/Point::.ctor()
IL_0027: callvirt instance int32 [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::Add(object)
IL_002c: pop
IL_002d: ldloc.0
IL_002e: ldc.i4.1
IL_002f: callvirt instance object [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::get_Item(int32)
IL_0034: castclass ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program/Point
IL_0039: stloc.2
IL_003a: ret
} // end of method Program::Main
.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor () cil managed
{
// Method begins at RVA 0x2097
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack 8
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]System.Object::.ctor()
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method Program::.ctor
} // end of class ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program
我看到.maxstack设置为2,但是当我手工完成代码时,我有时会在评估堆栈上得到3个元素。为什么?我是一个糟糕的IL堆栈计数器,还是这背后有意义?
在我的世界中,IL_0014上的第一个ldloc.0永远不会被删除,但也许只是我没有得到get_Item的callvirt如何工作。当我到达IL_0014时,我必须在我的纸叠上引用列表,然后在IL_0015,当0被推到评估堆栈时程序违反.maxstack。
我是新手,所以必定有一些不对的东西。也许我的计数是正确的,我对.maxstack的理解是错误的,或者可能是另一种方式。有人可以告诉我,如果我对.maxstack的理解是错误的,.maxstack会在运行时显示堆栈上的最大元素。或者如果我的计数错了? Add是否删除对列表实例的引用?
编辑: 这是我的计算方式。计数在IL代码运行之后:
IL_0000: 0 on stack
IL_0001: 1 on stack (the reference to array list)
IL_0006: 0 on stack
IL_0007: 1 on stack (the reference to arraylist)
IL_0008: 2 on stack (reference to arraylist and int 1)
IL_0009: 2 on stack (refernce to arraylist and reference to object that wrap 1)
IL_000e: 2 on stack (reference to arraylist and index to the added boxed int object)
IL_0013: 1 on stack (reference to arraylist)
IL_0014: 2 on stack (reference to arraylist and reference to arraylist)
IL_0015: 3 on stack (reference to arraylist and reference to arraylist and int 0)
我没有计算其余部分,因为我知道我遇到了错误。
由于
答案 0 :(得分:9)
很难看出你哪里出错了。在执行指令后,在左侧注释堆栈深度:
0 IL_0000: nop
1 IL_0001: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::.ctor()
0 IL_0006: stloc.0
1 IL_0007: ldloc.0
2 IL_0008: ldc.i4.1
2 IL_0009: box [mscorlib]System.Int32
1 IL_000e: callvirt instance int32 [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::Add(object)
0 IL_0013: pop
1 IL_0014: ldloc.0
2 IL_0015: ldc.i4.0
1 IL_0016: callvirt instance object [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::get_Item(int32)
1 IL_001b: unbox.any [mscorlib]System.Int32
0 IL_0020: stloc.1
1 IL_0021: ldloc.0
2 IL_0022: newobj instance void ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program/Point::.ctor()
1 IL_0027: callvirt instance int32 [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::Add(object)
0 IL_002c: pop
1 IL_002d: ldloc.0
2 IL_002e: ldc.i4.1
1 IL_002f: callvirt instance object [mscorlib]System.Collections.ArrayList::get_Item(int32)
1 IL_0034: castclass ArrayListBoxAndUnBox.Program/Point
0 IL_0039: stloc.2
0 IL_003a: ret
唯一不重要的是ArrayList.Add()调用。它弹出两个堆栈值,ArrayList对象引用和Add()参数。并向后推一个Add()的返回值。
编辑后:这确实是你出错的地方。