我可以用一个include / contains和一个id来限制它
explain SELECT "questions".*
FROM "questions"
INNER JOIN "taggings" ON "taggings"."question_id" = "questions"."id"
INNER JOIN "tags" ON "tags"."id" = "taggings"."tag_id"
WHERE ("tags"."name" IN ('Cats') AND "tags"."id" = 1);
结果
Nested Loop (cost=5.49..23.95 rows=1 width=1088)
-> Hash Join (cost=5.49..15.67 rows=1 width=1092)
Hash Cond: (taggings.question_id = questions.id)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on taggings (cost=4.31..14.45 rows=7 width=8)
Recheck Cond: (tag_id = 1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_taggings_on_tag_id (cost=0.00..4.30 rows=7 width=0)
Index Cond: (tag_id = 1)
-> Hash (cost=1.08..1.08 rows=8 width=1088)
-> Seq Scan on questions (cost=0.00..1.08 rows=8 width=1088)
-> Index Scan using index_tags_on_name on tags (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4)
Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'Cats'::text)
Filter: (id = 1)
(12 rows)
我可以使用相同的include语句(其中cat两次)来限制它
explain SELECT "questions".*
FROM "questions"
INNER JOIN "taggings" ON "taggings"."question_id" = "questions"."id"
INNER JOIN "tags" ON "tags"."id" = "taggings"."tag_id"
WHERE ("tags"."name" IN ('Cats')
AND "tags"."name" IN ('Cats'));
结果
Hash Join (cost=5.49..24.00 rows=1 width=1088)
Hash Cond: (taggings.question_id = questions.id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=4.31..22.79 rows=7 width=4)
-> Index Scan using index_tags_on_name on tags (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4)
Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'Cats'::text)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on taggings (cost=4.31..14.45 rows=7 width=8)
Recheck Cond: (tag_id = tags.id)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_taggings_on_tag_id (cost=0.00..4.30 rows=7 width=0)
Index Cond: (tag_id = tags.id)
-> Hash (cost=1.08..1.08 rows=8 width=1088)
-> Seq Scan on questions (cost=0.00..1.08 rows=8 width=1088)
(11 rows)
当我尝试按两个包含过滤时,没有结果
explain SELECT "questions".*
FROM "questions"
INNER JOIN "taggings" ON "taggings"."question_id" = "questions"."id"
INNER JOIN "tags" ON "tags"."id" = "taggings"."tag_id"
WHERE ("tags"."name" IN ('Cats')
AND "tags"."name" IN ('Dogs'));
结果
Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0)
One-Time Filter: false
(2 rows)
答案 0 :(得分:2)
如果你期望不同的东西,我假设你想使用OR而不是AND:
...
WHERE tags.name IN ('Cats')
OR tags.name IN ('Dogs')
或者将两个列表合并为一个列表:
...
WHERE tags.name IN ('Cats', 'Dogs')
正如你所拥有的那样,逻辑上不可能是真的,因为两个列表中没有值(你的集合的交集是空的)。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是非常错误的查询。这就是我想要的:
SELECT COUNT("questions"."id"), "questions"."title" FROM "questions"
INNER JOIN "taggings" ON "taggings"."question_id" = "questions"."id"
INNER JOIN "tags" ON "tags"."id" = "taggings"."tag_id"
WHERE ("tags"."name" IN ('Cats','Dogs'))
GROUP BY "questions"."id", "questions"."title"
HAVING COUNT("questions"."id") = 2;
这两个变量等于数组中的值的数量。