我有一组返回不同类型的方法:
Either[ErrorResponse, X]
Future[Either[ErrorResponse, X]]
Option[ErrorResponse]
这些方法需要先前方法的结果来执行计算。方法:
type Parameters = Map[String, String]
// allows me to flatmap on an either
implicit def toRightProjection[Failure, Success](e: Either[Failure, Success]) =
e.right
// converts anything to a future
implicit def toFuture[T](t: T) =
Future.successful(t)
// retrieves the request paramters from the given request
def requestParameters(request: RequestHeader): Either[ErrorResponse, Parameters] = ???
// retrieves the response type from the given parameters
def responseType(p: Parameters): Either[ErrorResponse, String] = ???
// retrieves the client id from the given parameters
def clientId(p: Parameters): Either[ErrorResponse, String] = ???
// retrieves the client using the given client id
def client(clientId: String): Future[Either[ErrorResponse, Client]] = ???
// validates the response type of the client
def validateResponseType(client: Client, responseType: String): Option[ErrorResponse] = ???
我可以将它们与以下内容结合起来进行理解(请注意,我写下了一些类型来澄清计算中特定部分的内容)。
val result: Either[ErrorResponse, Future[Either[ErrorResponse, Client]]] =
for {
parameters <- requestParameters(request)
clientId <- clientId(parameters)
responseType <- responseType(parameters)
} yield {
val result: Future[Either[ErrorResponse, Either[ErrorResponse, Client]]] =
for {
errorOrClient <- client(clientId)
client <- errorOrClient
} yield validateResponseType(client, responseType).toLeft(client)
result.map(_.joinRight)
}
val wantedResult: Future[Either[ErrorResponse, Client]] =
result.left.map(Future successful Left(_)).merge
上面的代码非常混乱,我觉得这可以用不同的方式完成。我读过monad和monad变形金刚。这些概念对我来说很新鲜,我无法理解它。
大多数示例仅处理两种类型的结果:Either[X, Y]
和Future[Either[X, Y]]
。我仍然觉得很难绕过它。
我怎样才能写出一个很好的和干净的理解来取代上面的理解?
这样的东西会很棒(我不确定这是否可能):
val result: Future[Either[ErrorResponse, Client]] =
for {
parameters <- requestParameters(request)
clientId <- clientId(parameters)
responseType <- responseType(parameters)
client <- client(clientId)
_ <- validateResponseType(client, responseType)
}
答案 0 :(得分:13)
好的,这是我的尝试:
import scalaz._, Scalaz._
implicit val futureMonad = new Monad[Future] {
override def point[A](a: ⇒ A): Future[A] = future(a)
override def bind[A, B](fa: Future[A])(f: A ⇒ Future[B]): Future[B] =
fa.flatMap(f)
}
import EitherT._
val result: EitherT[Future, ErrorResponse, Client] =
for {
parameters <- fromEither(Future(requestParameters(request)))
clientId <- fromEither(Future(clientId(parameters)))
responseType <- fromEither(Future(responseType(parameters)))
client <- fromEither(client(clientId))
response <- fromEither[Future, ErrorResponse, Client](Future(validateResponseType(client, responseType).toLeft(client)))
} yield response
val x: Future[\/[ErrorResponse, Client]] = result.run
答案 1 :(得分:2)
scala.util.Either
不是Monad,但scalaz库有很好的实现。
object Test extends ToIdOps {
import scalaz.{ Monad, Functor, EitherT, \/, -\/, \/- }
import scalaz.syntax.ToIdOps
implicit val FutureFunctor = new Functor[Future] {
def map[A, B](a: Future[A])(f: A => B): Future[B] = a map f
}
implicit val FutureMonad = new Monad[Future] {
def point[A](a: => A): Future[A] = Future(a)
def bind[A, B](fa: Future[A])(f: (A) => Future[B]): Future[B] = fa flatMap f
}
def someMethod: Future[\/[InvalidData, ValidData]] = {
// things went well
ValidData.right // this comes from ToIdOps
// or something went wrong
InvalidData.left
}
def someOtherMethod: Future[\/[InvalidData, ValidData]] // same as above
val seq = for {
d <- EitherT(someMethod)
y <- EitherT(someOtherMethod)
} yield { // whatever}
// you can now Await.result(seq.run, duration)
// you can map or match etc with \/- and -\/
val result = seq.run map {
case -\/(left) => // invalid data
case \/-(right) => // game on
}
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
对多种monad类型进行理解没有真正干净的方法。在ScalaZ中,OptionT可能有所帮助,值得一试。您也可以将您的Eithers转换为Options或者相反,并且可以减少一些混乱。第三种选择可能是创建自己的包装器,将Future [Either | Option]组合到同一个monad中,然后理解它。
作为参考,我最近在播放框架邮件列表上询问了同样的问题,并在回复中得到了一些很好的链接:https://groups.google.com/d/topic/play-framework/JmCsXNDvAns/discussion