子上下文未填充对默认上下文的更改（MagicalRecord）

时间：2013-09-19 10:55:13

标签： ios core-data nsmanagedobjectcontext magicalrecord magicalrecord-2.1

我尝试了同样的问题here。问题是使用DEFAULT上下文的子MOC来保存coredata，90％的时候，主线程上下文中的结果会更新来自子MOC的更改，但有时它们不是。

在我的测试中，我反复写入相同的实体（使用用户界面不太快）：广告实体（favorite_count）以及广告和用户之间的最爱关系。

从DEFAULT的子MOC保存时，这是MagicalRecord的预期输出（我也打印了updatedObjects计数）：

[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke_2]↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓  POST FAVORITE  ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
2013-09-19 11:40:35.154  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb8b55e0) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xb8b55e0): *** UNNAMED ***> on *** BACKGROUND THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:40:35.155  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb8b55e0) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.155  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb8b55e0) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.155  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb8b55e0) → Updated objects = 4
2013-09-19 11:40:35.183  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xba72700): *** DEFAULT ***> on *** BACKGROUND THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:40:35.184  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.184  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.185  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Updated objects = 2
2013-09-19 11:40:35.188 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3f7740): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:40:35.189 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.189 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:40:35.189 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Updated objects = 2
2013-09-19 11:40:35.191 __70-[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:]_block_invoke29(0xa3f7740) → Finished saving: <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3f7740): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke672] ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ------*------ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑

**注意：子MOC注册了4个更新，但在这种情况下，有两个对象（图像元数据）更新了相同的信息。

但有时这是获得的输出（父母没有updatedObjects）：

[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke_2]↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓  POST FAVORITE  ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
2013-09-19 11:37:39.718  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb876d20) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xb876d20): *** UNNAMED ***> on *** BACKGROUND THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:37:39.718  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb876d20) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.719  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb876d20) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.719  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb876d20) → Updated objects = 4
2013-09-19 11:37:39.720  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xba72700): *** DEFAULT ***> on *** BACKGROUND THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:37:39.720  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.720  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.721  -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xba72700) → Updated objects = 0
2013-09-19 11:37:39.722 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3f7740): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:37:39.723 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.723 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Save Synchronously? 1
2013-09-19 11:37:39.723 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3f7740) → Updated objects = 0
2013-09-19 11:37:39.725 __70-[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:]_block_invoke29(0xa3f7740) → Finished saving: <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3f7740): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke672] ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ------*------ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑

我使用串行队列对CoreData执行所有写操作。此串行队列为当前线程创建子MOC。这是作者的代码：

+ (void) saveWithBlock: (void(^)(NSManagedObjectContext *threadContext))block
{
    [ZCMagicalRecord saveWithBlock:block completion:nil];

}

+ (void) saveWithBlock: (void(^)(NSManagedObjectContext *threadContext))block completion:(MRSaveCompletionHandler)completion;
{
    dispatch_async( _queue, ^{

        NSManagedObjectContext *ctx = [NSManagedObjectContext MR_contextForCurrentThread];

        [ctx performBlockAndWait:^{
            block( ctx );

            [ctx  MR_saveWithOptions:MRSaveParentContexts|MRSaveSynchronously completion:completion];
        }];

    });
}

另一方面，当我使用UI MainThread使用 [MagicalRecord saveUsingCurrentThreadContextWithBlock:]时，更改将全部填充到ROOT上下文和持久存储：

[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke_2]↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓  POST FAVORITE  ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
2013-09-19 11:47:01.082 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb348550) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xb348550): *** DEFAULT ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:47:01.082 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb348550) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:47:01.083 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb348550) → Save Synchronously? 0
2013-09-19 11:47:01.083 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xb348550) → Updated objects = 5
2013-09-19 11:47:01.102 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3cd840) → Saving <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3cd840): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** MAIN THREAD ***
2013-09-19 11:47:01.102 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3cd840) → Save Parents? 1
2013-09-19 11:47:01.103 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3cd840) → Save Synchronously? 0
2013-09-19 11:47:01.103 -[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:](0xa3cd840) → Updated objects = 2
2013-09-19 11:47:01.106  __70-[NSManagedObjectContext(MagicalSaves) MR_saveWithOptions:completion:]_block_invoke29(0xa3cd840) → Finished saving: <NSManagedObjectContext (0xa3cd840): *** BACKGROUND SAVING (ROOT) ***> on *** BACKGROUND THREAD ***
[__52-[ZCServer postFavoriteAd:withDelegate:andSelector:]_block_invoke676] ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ------*------ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑

[MagicalRecord saveUsingCurrentThreadContextWithBlock:]的代码与我写的相似（我只编写它来顺序完成所有写操作）：

+ (void) saveUsingCurrentThreadContextWithBlockAndWait:(void (^)(NSManagedObjectContext *localContext))block;
{
    NSManagedObjectContext *localContext = [NSManagedObjectContext MR_contextForCurrentThread];

    [localContext performBlockAndWait:^{
        if (block) {
            block(localContext);
        }

        [localContext MR_saveWithOptions:MRSaveParentContexts|MRSaveSynchronously completion:nil];
    }];
}

在我进行此测试时，CoreData中没有其他类型的写入。我在这里发布了POST FAVORITE示例，但DELETE FAVORITE是在帖子之间完成的，并且错误在帖子和删除中随机发生。服务器的响应也已正确验证。

注意

传递给代码块的对象上下文将被忽略。我总是使用[EntityClass MR_CreateEntity]使用实际的线程上下文。并且MR_saveWithOptions:completion:总是使用的上下文是执行块的线程上下文。因此在所有操作中使用相同的上下文。该应用程序非常复杂，在大多数情况下工作正常，但这个错误可能会造成比我现在看不到的更多麻烦。

0 个答案:

没有答案
相关问题
最新问题