我一直在使用ExecutorCompletionService中的示例代码,并将以下示例代码放在一起。 solve()中的代码按预期工作并打印
1
solve2()中的代码不会打印任何内容,实际上永远不会退出。是否在将作业提交到ExecutionService之前或之后构建了ecs并不重要。
2
3
4
5
没有办法在FutureTasks中使用CompletionService构造吗?我已经重写了我的生产代码以直接获取()FutureCask的结果,而不是尝试从ExecutorCompletionService获取()它们,但它(当前)导致了一些看起来很乱的东西。简而言之,下面的solve2有什么问题?感谢。
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.CompletionService;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorCompletionService;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.FutureTask;
public class sample {
public static class stringCallable implements Callable<String>{
String mstring;
stringCallable(String s) {mstring = s;}
@Override
public String call() throws Exception {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return mstring;
}
};
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
ArrayList<Callable<String>> list = new ArrayList<Callable<String>>();
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1);
Executor e = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
list.add(new stringCallable("1"));
list.add(new stringCallable("2"));
list.add(new stringCallable("3"));
list.add(new stringCallable("4"));
list.add(new stringCallable("5"));
try {
solve(e, list);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
} catch (ExecutionException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println ("Starting Solver 2");
try {
solve2(es, list);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
} catch (ExecutionException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
}
}
static void solve(Executor e, Collection<Callable<String>> solvers)throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
CompletionService<String> ecs = new ExecutorCompletionService<String>(e);
for (Callable<String> s : solvers)
ecs.submit(s);
int n = solvers.size();
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
String r = ecs.take().get();
if (r != null)
use(r);
}
}
static void solve2(ExecutorService e, Collection<Callable<String>> solvers)throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
for (Callable<String> s : solvers){
FutureTask<String> f = new FutureTask<String>(s);
e.submit(f);
}
CompletionService<String> ecs = new ExecutorCompletionService<String>(e);
int n = solvers.size();
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
String r = ecs.take().get();
if (r != null)
use(r);
}
}
private static void use(String r) {
System.out.println (r);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:3)
在solve2
中,当您使用现有ExecutorCompletionService
创建ExecutorService
时,包装器会忽略提交的任务,因为它使用单独的LinkedBlockingQueue
。提交的任务不会被继承。因此,当您执行ecs.take().get();
时,您的代码会阻塞,因为ExecutorCompletionService
本身没有提交任何任务。
此外,您无需专门创建FutureTask即可提交给ExecutorCompletionService
。这些Future任务已经在内部为您创建。这就是您在致电Future<String>
时获得ecs.take();
的原因。
鉴于此,您的solve2
功能完全没用。您已在solve1
中正确执行此操作。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是我实现它的方式:
static void solve2(ExecutorService e, Collection<Callable<String>> solvers)throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
CompletionService<String> ecs = new ExecutorCompletionService<String>(e);
for (Callable<String> s : solvers){
ecs.submit(s);
}
int n = solvers.size();
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
String r = ecs.take().get();
if (r != null)
use(r);
}
}
ExecutorCompletionService“只是”ExecutorService的包装器,但您必须将您的callables提交给ECS,因为ECS将获取可调用的结果,将其放入队列。然后可以通过take()或poll()获得此结果。 如果直接在ExecutorService上提交可调用对象,则ECS无法知道其完成情况。 如果你看一下ECS的javadoc,就会说出完全相同的东西+很好的例子(更好的解释)。我建议你也看看源代码java.util.concurrent.ExecutorCompletionService