我们有一个针对一些相当大的表执行的存储过程,并且在连接到更大的表时,它还保持与相应的batch_id匹配的记录数。我想弄清楚的是,我可以用计数或其他方法来改进这个吗?试图摆脱嵌套的SELECT COUNT(*)语句。 CCTransactions表是140万行,BatchItems是660万行。
SELECT a.ItemAuthID, a.FeeAuthID, a.Batch_ID, a.ItemAuthCode,
a.FeeAuthCode, b.Amount, b.Fee,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM BatchItems WHERE Batch_ID = a.Batch_ID) AS BatchCount,
ItemBillDate, FeeBillDate, b.AccountNumber,
b.Itemcode, ItemAuthToken, FeeAuthToken,
cc.ItemMerchant, cc.FeeMerchant
FROM CCTransactions a WITH(NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN BatchItems b WITH(NOLOCK)
ON a.Batch_ID = b.Batch_ID
INNER JOIN CCConfig cc WITH(NOLOCK)
ON a.ClientCode = cc.ClientCode
WHERE ((ItemAuthCode > '' AND ItemBillDate IS NULL)
OR (FeeAuthCode > '' AND FeeBillDate IS NULL))
AND TransactionDate BETWEEN DATEADD(d,-7,GETDATE())
AND convert(char(20),getdate(),101) + ' ' + @Cutoff
ORDER BY TransactionDate
答案 0 :(得分:0)
当您的DBMS支持WIndowed Aggregate Functions时,您可以将其重写为
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY Batch_ID)
当然这只返回SELECT返回的每个Batch_ID的行数。如果内部联接导致行数减少,则不是正确的数字。
然后将标量子查询重写为连接可能更有效(取决于您的DBMS):
SELECT a.ItemAuthID, a.FeeAuthID, a.Batch_ID, a.ItemAuthCode,
a.FeeAuthCode, b.Amount, b.Fee,
dt.BatchCount,
ItemBillDate, FeeBillDate, b.AccountNumber,
b.Itemcode, ItemAuthToken, FeeAuthToken,
cc.ItemMerchant, cc.FeeMerchant
FROM CCTransactions a WITH(NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN BatchItems b WITH(NOLOCK)
ON a.Batch_ID = b.Batch_ID
INNER JOIN CCConfig cc WITH(NOLOCK)
ON a.ClientCode = cc.ClientCode
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT BatchCount, COUNT(*) AS BatchCount
FROM BatchItems
GROUP BY Batch_ID
) AS dt ON a.Batch_ID = dt.Batch_ID
WHERE ((ItemAuthCode > '' AND ItemBillDate IS NULL)
OR (FeeAuthCode > '' AND FeeBillDate IS NULL))
AND TransactionDate BETWEEN DATEADD(d,-7,GETDATE())
AND convert(CHAR(20),getdate(),101) + ' ' + @Cutoff
ORDER BY TransactionDate