我无法弄清楚为什么rails has_one:通过关联不接受分配。这是错误:
>> u = User.new
=> #<User id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
>> u.primary_account
=> nil
>> u.primary_account = Account.new
NoMethodError: undefined method `update_attributes' for #<Class:0x1035ce5f0>
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/base.rb:1959:in `method_missing'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/association_collection.rb:380:in `send'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/association_collection.rb:380:in `method_missing'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/base.rb:2143:in `with_scope'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:206:in `send'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:206:in `with_scope'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/association_collection.rb:376:in `method_missing'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations/has_one_through_association.rb:11:in `create_through_record'
from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/associations.rb:1274:in `primary_account='
from (irb):9
>>
假设:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :memberships
has_many :accounts, :through => :memberships
has_one :primary_account, :through => :memberships, :source => :account, :conditions => { :role => 1 } # assume memberships.role of type integer in the db
end
class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :account
belongs_to :user
end
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :memberships
has_many :users, :through => :memberships
end
看起来这些作业应该有效,除非我遗漏了什么。它们似乎适用于Rails单元测试。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您可能需要has_one:primary_membership,然后使用该帐户。
has_one :primary_membership, :class_name => 'Membership', :conditions => {:role => 1}
然后你可以,
user.primary_membership.account
答案 1 :(得分:0)
尝试将相关关联设置为belongs_to
而不是has_one
。
我觉得我之前遇到过这种情况并且认为这样做了。不幸的是,我没有进一步研究为什么has_one :through
有意义或没有意义。