我有以下代码。显然,Reference类不是线程安全的,因为它不保护其“引用”属性。我如何证明我需要通过例如Atomicreference来保护它?
当我运行以下JUnit测试时,它会在两个Windows上运行:Intel(R)Core(TM)i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz和Linux:使用JRE 1.7的Intel(R)Xeon(R)CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz .0_15。
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
public class AssignReferenceTest {
private static class Reference {
private Object reference = null;
private void setReference(Object reference) {
this.reference = reference;
}
boolean hasReference() {
return reference != null;
}
}
@Test
public void runManyTimes() throws Exception {
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
testReferenceVisibilityProblem();
}
}
public void testReferenceVisibilityProblem() throws Exception {
final Reference reference = new Reference();
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
Thread writeThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
reference.setReference(new Object());
latch.countDown();
}
});
Thread readThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
try {
latch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
assertTrue("Should have the reference", reference.hasReference());
}
});
writeThread.start();
readThread.start();
writeThread.join();
readThread.join();
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您的代码是线程安全的,因为CountDownLatch保证在await()
之前完成的每个更改都会在之后完成所有操作之前完成。
请参阅http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/package-summary.html:
在“释放”同步器方法之前的操作,例如Lock.unlock,Semaphore.release和CountDownLatch.countDown,在成功的“获取”方法(例如Lock.lock,Semaphore.acquire,Condition.await)之后的操作之前发生。和另一个线程中同一个同步器对象上的CountDownLatch.await。