我遇到了字符串解析的问题,想通过正则表达式解决她。 总是作为输入我得到的字符串相同:%function_name%(IN:param1,...,paramN; OUT:param1,...,paramN)
我写了一个模式:
string pattern = @"[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9]*\(IN:\s*(([A-za-z][A-za-z0-9](,|;))+|;)\s*OUT:(\s*[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9],?)*\)";
这个模式检测到我的输入字符串,但实际上作为输出我想要有两个字符串数组。其中一个必须包含INPUT参数(在“IN:”之后)IN: param1, ..., paramN
,第二个数组必须包含输出参数的名称。参数可以包含数字和'_'。
真实输入字符串的几个例子:
Add_func(IN:port_0,in_port_1; OUT:out_port99)
Some_func(IN :; OUT:abc_P1)
Some_func2(IN:input_portA; OUT:)
请告诉我如何制作正确的图案。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
您可以使用此模式,允许一次性使用单独的参数捕获所有函数:
(?<funcName>\w+)\(IN: ?|OUT: ?|\G(?<inParam>[^,;()]+)?(?=[^)(;]*;)\s*[,;]\s*|\G(?<outParam>[^,()]+)(?=[^;]*\s*\))\s*[,)]\s*
模式细节:
(?<funcName>\w+)\(IN: ? # capture the function name and match "(IN: "
| # OR
OUT: ? # match "OUT: "
| # OR
\G(?<inParam>[^,;()]+)? # contiguous match, that captures a IN param
(?=[^)(;]*;) # check that it is always followed by ";"
\s*[,;]\s* # match "," or ";" (to be always contiguous)
| # OR
\G(?<outParam>[^,()]+)? # contiguous match, that captures a OUT param
(?=[^;]*\s*\)) # check that it is always followed by ")"
\s*[,)]\s* # match "," (to be always contiguous) or ")"
(要获得更清晰的结果,您必须走到匹配数组(使用foreach)并删除空条目)
示例代码:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string subject = @"Add_func(IN: port_0, in_port_1; OUT: out_port99)
Some_func(IN:;OUT: abc_P1)
shift_data(IN:po1_p0;OUT: po1_p1, po1_p2)
Some_func2(IN: input_portA;OUT:)";
string pattern = @"(?<funcName>\w+)\(IN: ?|OUT: ?|\G(?<inParam>[^,;()]+)?(?=[^)(;]*;)\s*[,;]\s*|\G(?<outParam>[^,()]+)(?=[^;]*\s*\))\s*[,)]\s*";
Match m = Regex.Match(subject, pattern);
while (m.Success)
{
if (m.Groups["funcName"].ToString() != "")
{
Console.WriteLine("\nfunction name: " + m.Groups["funcName"]);
}
if (m.Groups["inParam"].ToString() != "")
{
Console.WriteLine("IN param: " + m.Groups["inParam"]);
}
if (m.Groups["outParam"].ToString() != "")
{
Console.WriteLine("OUT param: "+m.Groups["outParam"]);
}
m = m.NextMatch();
}
}
另一种方法是将所有IN参数和所有OUT参数匹配在一个字符串中,然后用\s*,\s*
示例:
string pattern = @"(?<funcName>\w+)\(\s*IN:\s*(?<inParams>[^;]*?)\s*;\s*OUT\s*:\s*(?<outParams>[^)]*?)\s*\)";
Match m = Regex.Match(subject, pattern);
while (m.Success)
{
string functionName = m.Groups["function name"].ToString();
string[] inParams = Regex.Split(m.Groups["inParams"].ToString(), @"\s*,\s*");
string[] outParams = Regex.Split(m.Groups["outParams"].ToString(), @"\s*,\s*");
// Why not construct a "function" object to store all these values
m = m.NextMatch();
}
答案 1 :(得分:1)
执行此操作的方法是捕获组。命名捕获组是最容易使用的:
// a regex surrounded by parens is a capturing group
// a regex surrounded by (?<name> ... ) is a named capturing group
// here I've tried to surround the relevant parts of the pattern with named groups
var pattern = @"[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9]*\(IN:\s*(((?<inValue>[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9])(,|;))+|;)\s*OUT:(\s*(?<outValue>[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9]),?)*\)";
// get all the matches. ExplicitCapture is just an optimization which tells the engine that it
// doesn't have to save state for non-named capturing groups
var matches = Regex.Matches(input: input, pattern: pattern, options: RegexOptions.ExplicitCapture)
// convert from IEnumerable to IEnumerable<Match>
.Cast<Match>()
// for each match, select out the captured values
.Select(m => new {
// m.Groups["inValue"] gets the named capturing group "inValue"
// for groups that match multiple times in a single match (as in this case, we access
// group.Captures, which records each capture of the group. .Cast converts to IEnumerable<T>,
// at which point we can select out capture.Value, which is the actual captured text
inValues = m.Groups["inValue"].Captures.Cast<Capture>().Select(c => c.Value).ToArray(),
outValues = m.Groups["outValue"].Captures.Cast<Capture>().Select(c => c.Value).ToArray()
})
.ToArray();
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我认为这就是你要找的东西:
[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9_]*\(IN:((?:\s*(?:[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9_]*(?:[,;])))+|;)\s*OUT:(\s*[A-za-z][A-za-z0-9_]*,?)*\)
分组存在一些问题,以及缺少多个IN参数之间的空间。您也不允许在示例中出现下划线。
以上内容适用于上述所有示例。
Add_func(IN: port_0, in_port_1; OUT: out_port99)
将捕获:
port_0, in_port_1
和out_port99
Some_func(IN:;OUT: abc_P1)
将捕获:
;
和abc_P1
Some_func2(IN: input_portA; OUT:)
将捕获:
input_portA
并清空。获取这些捕获组后,您可以在逗号上拆分它们以获取阵列。