嗨我在Wordpress 3.5 Varnish 3.02和Ubuntu上有一个非常奇怪的问题,可视化编辑器已经消失了。在html / visual之间切换的按钮消失了,只显示了html编辑器。该网站缓存正常,没有javascript错误,并且在apache日志中没有错误。 Varnish正在80和8080上听Apache。除了编辑器,其他一切都很好。 当我绕过清漆时,编辑器开关按钮出现并正常工作。以下是我迄今为止所取得的成就: - 禁用所有插件 - 切换到默认主题 - 检查firebug是否有任何jquery错误(NONE) - Bypassed Varnish(一切正常) - 清除清漆缓存(没有运气) - 重新上传所有默认的wordpress文件 - 切换到早期版本的Wordpress(3.5) 您认为可能是什么问题?在这个问题上,我一直在摸不着头脑。
VCL文件
backend default {
.host = "x.x.x.x";
.port = "8080";
}
sub vcl_recv {
if (req.http.host ~ "mydomain.com") {
set req.http.x-Redir-Url = "http://www.anotherdomain.com/specific_folder/";
error 750 req.http.x-Redir-Url;
}
}
include "devicedetect.vcl";
# Called after a document has been successfully retrieved from the backend.
sub vcl_recv {
call devicedetect;
# Allow the back-end to serve up stale content if it is responding slowly.
set req.grace = 2m;
# Always cache the following file types for all users.
if ( req.url ~ "(?i)\.(png|gif|jpeg|jpg|ico|swf|css|js|html|htm)(\?[a-z0-9]+)?$" ) {
unset req.http.cookie;
}
# Don't serve cached pages to logged in users
if ( req.http.cookie ~ "wordpress_logged_in" || req.url ~ "vaultpress=true" ) {
return( pass );
}
# Drop any cookies sent to WordPress.
if ( ! ( req.url ~ "wp-(login|admin)" ) ) {
unset req.http.cookie;
}
# Handle compression correctly. Different browsers send different
# "Accept-Encoding" headers, even though they mostly all support the same
# compression mechanisms. By consolidating these compression headers into
# a consistent format, we can reduce the size of the cache and get more hits.
# @see: http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/FAQ/Compression
if ( req.http.Accept-Encoding ) {
if ( req.http.Accept-Encoding ~ "gzip" ) {
# If the browser supports it, we'll use gzip.
set req.http.Accept-Encoding = "gzip";
}
else if ( req.http.Accept-Encoding ~ "deflate" ) {
# Next, try deflate if it is supported.
sset req.http.Accept-Encoding = "deflate";
}
else {
# Unknown algorithm. Remove it and send unencoded.
unset req.http.Accept-Encoding;
}
}
}
# MOBILE AND UA DETECTION - override the header before it is sent to the backend
sub vcl_miss { if (req.http.X-UA-Device) { set bereq.http.User-Agent = req.http.X-UA-Device; } }
sub vcl_pass { if (req.http.X-UA-Device) { set bereq.http.User-Agent = req.http.X-UA-Device; } }
sub vcl_fetch {
#SET UA BEFORE SENDING TO BACKEND
if (req.http.X-UA-Device) {
if (!beresp.http.Vary) { # no Vary at all
set beresp.http.Vary = "X-UA-Device";
} elseif (beresp.http.Vary !~ "X-UA-Device") { # add to existing Vary
set beresp.http.Vary = beresp.http.Vary + ", X-UA-Device";
}
}
set beresp.http.X-UA-Device = req.http.X-UA-Device;
#Fix Login under wordpress
if (beresp.http.set-cookie ~ "sessionid" || beresp.http.set-cookie ~ "csrftoken") {
# return (pass);
} else {
return (deliver);
}
set beresp.ttl = 20m;
# Allow items to be stale if needed.
set beresp.grace = 2m;
# Drop any cookies WordPress tries to send back to the client.
if ( ! req.url ~ "wp-(login|admin)" && ! req.http.cookie ~ "wordpress_logged_in" ) {
unset beresp.http.set-cookie;
}
}
sub vcl_error {
#REDIRECTION
if (obj.status == 750) {
set obj.http.Location = obj.response;
set obj.status = 301;
return (deliver);
}
set obj.http.Content-Type = "text/html; charset=utf-8";
set obj.http.Retry-After = "5";
synthetic {"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>OOPS UNE ERREUR S'EST PRODUITE</title>
<style src="css/style.css"></style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Oh! Oh! Nos excuses. Une erreure s'est produite. On s'en occupe.</h1>
</body>
</html>
"};
return (deliver);
}
sub vcl_deliver {
if ((req.http.X-UA-Device) && (resp.http.Vary)) {
set resp.http.Vary = regsub(resp.http.Vary, "X-UA-Device", "User-Agent");
}
}
**************THIS IS ANOTHER FILE(devicedetect.vcl)**********************
INCLUDED DEVICE DETECTION:
#
# detectdevice.vcl - regex based device detection for Varnish
# http://github.com/varnish/varnish-devicedetect/
#
# Author: Lasse Karstensen <lasse@varnish-software.com>
sub devicedetect {
unset req.http.X-UA-Device;
set req.http.X-UA-Device = "pc";
# Handle that a cookie may override the detection alltogether.
if (req.http.Cookie ~ "(?i)X-UA-Device-force") {
/* ;?? means zero or one ;, non-greedy to match the first. */
set req.http.X-UA-Device = regsub(req.http.Cookie, "(?i).*X-UA-Device-force=([^;]+);??.*", "\1");
/* Clean up our mess in the cookie header */
set req.http.Cookie = regsuball(req.http.Cookie, "(^|; ) *X-UA-Device-force=[^;]+;? *", "\1");
/* If the cookie header is now empty, or just whitespace, unset it. */
if (req.http.Cookie ~ "^ *$") { unset req.http.Cookie; }
} else {
if (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)(ads|google|bing|msn|yandex|baidu|ro|career|)bot" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)(baidu|jike|symantec)spider" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)scanner" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)(web)crawler") {
set req.http.X-UA-Device = "bot"; }
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)ipad") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "tablet-ipad"; }
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)ip(hone|od)") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "mobile-iphone"; }
/* how do we differ between an android phone and an android tablet?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5341637/how-do-detect-android-tablets-in-general-useragent */
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)android.*(mobile|mini)") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "mobile-android"; }
// android 3/honeycomb was just about tablet-only, and any phones will probably handle a bigger page layout.
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)android 3") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "tablet-android"; }
// May very well give false positives towards android tablets. Suggestions welcome.
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)android") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "tablet-android"; }
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "Mobile.+Firefox") { set req.http.X-UA-Device = "mobile-firefoxos"; }
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "^HTC" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "Fennec" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "IEMobile" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "BlackBerry" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "SymbianOS.*AppleWebKit" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "Opera Mobi") {
set req.http.X-UA-Device = "mobile-smartphone";
}
elsif (req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)symbian" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)^sonyericsson" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)^nokia" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)^samsung" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)^lg" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)bada" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)blazer" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)cellphone" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)iemobile" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)midp-2.0" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)u990" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)netfront" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)opera mini" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)palm" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)nintendo wii" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)playstation portable" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)portalmmm" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)proxinet" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)sonyericsson" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)symbian" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)windows\ ?ce" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)winwap" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)eudoraweb" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)htc" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)240x320" ||
req.http.User-Agent ~ "(?i)avantgo") {
set req.http.X-UA-Device = "mobile-generic";
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:3)
在遇到同样的问题时,我偶然发现了这个问题。我试着按照提问者在后续“回复”中提出的建议,但我运气不好。
问题中描述的问题源于Wordpress仅在用户代理与已知用户代理匹配时启用TinyMCE(可视)编辑器的事实。对于其他一切,它将默认禁用它。结合devicedetect.vcl
,你可以看到它的发展方向......
所以,因为我们正在向后端(Wordpress)发送“pc”,“mobile-platform”等,它实际上永远不会知道你正在使用的浏览器。
在我的VCL中,我使用以下代码完全禁用/ wp-admin的缓存:
if (req.url ~ "/wp-(login|admin)") {
return (pass);
}
当我实施devicedetect.vcl
时,我在sub vcl_recv
的顶部调用例程,因此用户代理已经在修改后的状态下到达我的后端。
解决方法是在return (pass)
之前/wp-(login|admin)
{/ 1>} call devicedetect
,if (req.url ~ "/wp-(login|admin)") {
return (pass);
}
call devicedetect;
,如下所示:
setTimeout
答案 1 :(得分:2)
是的,无论是否登录,都会发生这种情况。
问题在于vcl_recv中对devicedetect的调用。我在第一个处理devicedetect例程之后创建了一个新的vcl_recv。这以某种方式解决了这个问题。
由于