"该程序意外结束。"
我有一个正在调用CMem::Write()
的班级。它显示屏幕的迭代。有时它达到140,其他...... 12,3,42立即掉出来......非常随机
如果我删除对CMem::Write()
的调用,程序将永远运行。
不确定为什么程序终止?我只能假设某些东西不是用CMem::Write()
方法写的。
CMem::CMem()//sets up the "static" stack memory and the pointers to it; also the "static" positionIndex
{
m_nBufferLength = sizeof(char); //short int
static char *cMessageCB = new char[m_nBufferLength];
static double *dTimeCB = new double[m_nBufferLength];
m_cMessageCB = cMessageCB;
m_dTimeCB = dTimeCB;
////////////////////////////////////////
static char *cMessageReadList = new char[m_nBufferLength]; //max size can be the CB
static double *dTimeReadList = new double[m_nBufferLength]; //max size can be the CB
m_cMessageReadList = cMessageReadList;
m_dTimeReadList = dTimeReadList;
static int firstInstance = 0;
if(firstInstance == 0){
m_posRead = 0;//only on first instance
m_posWrite = 0;//only on first instance
firstInstance++;//check to see if multiple threads entered at the same time and look at the count
}
}
void CMem::Write()
{//double dTime, char cMessage
//only one thread can write at a time... so lock... (make other threads with various random delays)
static bool bUse = false;
bool bDone = false;
while(bDone == false){
if(bUse == false){
bUse = true;
m_cMessageCB[m_posWrite] = m_cMessageWrite;
m_dTimeCB[m_posWrite] = m_dTimeWrite;
m_posWrite = (unsigned char)(m_posWrite + 1);
static char cFlag = 0;
//if writing position == reading position then flag
if(m_posWrite == m_posRead){
cFlag = 1;
}
bDone = true;
bUse = false;
}else if(bUse == true){
printf("SUSPEND ");
}
}
}
void CMem::Read()
{//get the whole block of memory and increment the m_posRead accordingly
unsigned char j = 0;
while( (m_posRead + 1) != (m_posWrite + 1) ){
m_cMessageReadList[j] = m_cMessageCB[m_posRead];//inc m_posRead at the end
m_dTimeReadList[j] = m_dTimeCB[m_posRead];//inc m_posRead at the end
m_posRead = (unsigned char)(m_posRead + 1);//circulate around
j++;// 'j' is not circulating back around
}
//write to file
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
这些代码似乎是此代码的一个问题:
if(firstInstance == 0){
m_posRead = 0;//only on first instance
m_posWrite = 0;//only on first instance
为什么只在第一个实例上初始化索引?其他实例会使这些成员未初始化,因此显然会破坏内存。
编辑(关于评论):好的,您可以将它们设置为静态,但这会显示您的设计存在严重问题。但这是偏离主题的。在使它们变为静态之后,另一个问题仍然存在:m_posWrite变量仅增加并且从不重置/减少 - 您如何期望它不会超出界限?
答案 1 :(得分:0)
使用您提供的任何代码,似乎是内存损坏的明显案例
第一
if(firstInstance == 0){
m_posRead = 0;//only on first instance
m_posWrite = 0;//only on first instance
firstInstance++;//check to see if multiple threads entered at the same time and look at the count
}
上面的代码仅针对第一个实例将m_posRead和m_posWrite初始化为0。对于所有其他实例,它是未定义的。
其次,在你正在做的构造函数中
m_nBufferLength = sizeof(char); //short int
static char *cMessageCB = new char[m_nBufferLength];
m_cMessageCB = cMessageCB;
现在,这使得m_cMessageCB只有1个字节宽。而在CMem :: Write中你正在做
m_cMessageCB[m_posWrite] = m_cMessageWrite;
m_dTimeCB[m_posWrite] = m_dTimeWrite;
m_posWrite = (unsigned char)(m_posWrite + 1);
这里m_posWrite已递增。第一次它将写在第0个索引上。下次调用CMem:Write时,它将尝试在第一个索引上写入“Array Out Of Bound Write”(因为m_cMessageCB只有1个字节宽)并且它的行为是未定义的。它可以在下一次写入或任何其他未来写入时终止。