我正在创建asp.net mvc4示例。在此我在datacontext的Sample表中创建了Id列作为GUID。
public class Sample
{
[Required]
public Guid ID { get; set; }
[Required]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
}
这是实体表
CreateTable(
"dbo.Samples",
c => new
{
ID = c.Guid(nullable: false),
FirstName = c.String(nullable: false)
})
.PrimaryKey(t => t.ID);
Id传递00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000。
如何将newid()
设置为GUID
以及我必须设置的位置。
答案 0 :(得分:13)
我建议您只使用long
作为您的ID类型。它只是工作"与GUID相比有一些性能提升。但是如果你想使用GUID,你应该使用Sequential GUID并在构造函数中设置它。我还会将ID设为private
setter:
public class Sample
{
public Sample() {
ID = GuidComb.Generate();
}
[Required]
public Guid ID { get; private set; }
[Required]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
}
public static class GuidComb
{
public static Guid Generate()
{
var buffer = Guid.NewGuid().ToByteArray();
var time = new DateTime(0x76c, 1, 1);
var now = DateTime.Now;
var span = new TimeSpan(now.Ticks - time.Ticks);
var timeOfDay = now.TimeOfDay;
var bytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(span.Days);
var array = BitConverter.GetBytes(
(long)(timeOfDay.TotalMilliseconds / 3.333333));
Array.Reverse(bytes);
Array.Reverse(array);
Array.Copy(bytes, bytes.Length - 2, buffer, buffer.Length - 6, 2);
Array.Copy(array, array.Length - 4, buffer, buffer.Length - 4, 4);
return new Guid(buffer);
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:7)
这也可以通过属性来完成:
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public Guid AddressID { get; set; }
答案 2 :(得分:5)
我在Nlog日志记录到数据库时遇到了同样的问题。我所做的是故意打开迁移文件并进行以下更改
CreateTable(
"dbo.Samples",
c => new
{
ID = c.Guid(nullable: false,identity:true),
FirstName = c.String(nullable: false)
})
.PrimaryKey(t => t.ID);
identity参数实际上创建了defaultvalue
为newsequentialid()
的表格
在表中。
答案 3 :(得分:3)
如果我们忽略周围的政治因素(如果这是个好主意),那么@TombMedia的答案很可能就是您想要的。
但是,如果您需要向现有表中添加新列,并希望指定newId()用作默认值,因为该字段不可为空,则可以在迁移类中使用它:
AddColumn(
"dbo.Samples",
"UUID",
c => c.Guid(nullable: false, defaultValueSql: "newId()")
);
注意:这是一个古老的问题,在EF6中仍然很重要,在寻求有关如何在EF迁移中使用newId的帮助时,排名很高,这就是为什么要添加此答案。
答案 4 :(得分:2)
保罗的答案是正确的,但顺序指导的实施可以得到改善。如果在同一台服务器上创建,This implementation of sequential guid会更频繁地增加并阻止相同的数字。
要阻止link rot,请输入以下代码:
public class SequentialGuid
{
public DateTime SequenceStartDate { get; private set; }
public DateTime SequenceEndDate { get; private set; }
private const int NumberOfBytes = 6;
private const int PermutationsOfAByte = 256;
private readonly long _maximumPermutations = (long)Math.Pow(PermutationsOfAByte, NumberOfBytes);
private long _lastSequence;
public SequentialGuid(DateTime sequenceStartDate, DateTime sequenceEndDate)
{
SequenceStartDate = sequenceStartDate;
SequenceEndDate = sequenceEndDate;
}
public SequentialGuid()
: this(new DateTime(2011, 10, 15), new DateTime(2100, 1, 1))
{
}
private static readonly Lazy<SequentialGuid> InstanceField = new Lazy<SequentialGuid>(() => new SequentialGuid());
internal static SequentialGuid Instance
{
get
{
return InstanceField.Value;
}
}
public static Guid NewGuid()
{
return Instance.GetGuid();
}
public TimeSpan TimePerSequence
{
get
{
var ticksPerSequence = TotalPeriod.Ticks / _maximumPermutations;
var result = new TimeSpan(ticksPerSequence);
return result;
}
}
public TimeSpan TotalPeriod
{
get
{
var result = SequenceEndDate - SequenceStartDate;
return result;
}
}
private long GetCurrentSequence(DateTime value)
{
var ticksUntilNow = value.Ticks - SequenceStartDate.Ticks;
var result = ((decimal)ticksUntilNow / TotalPeriod.Ticks * _maximumPermutations - 1);
return (long)result;
}
public Guid GetGuid()
{
return GetGuid(DateTime.Now);
}
private readonly object _synchronizationObject = new object();
internal Guid GetGuid(DateTime now)
{
if (now < SequenceStartDate || now > SequenceEndDate)
{
return Guid.NewGuid(); // Outside the range, use regular Guid
}
var sequence = GetCurrentSequence(now);
return GetGuid(sequence);
}
internal Guid GetGuid(long sequence)
{
lock (_synchronizationObject)
{
if (sequence <= _lastSequence)
{
// Prevent double sequence on same server
sequence = _lastSequence + 1;
}
_lastSequence = sequence;
}
var sequenceBytes = GetSequenceBytes(sequence);
var guidBytes = GetGuidBytes();
var totalBytes = guidBytes.Concat(sequenceBytes).ToArray();
var result = new Guid(totalBytes);
return result;
}
private IEnumerable<byte> GetSequenceBytes(long sequence)
{
var sequenceBytes = BitConverter.GetBytes(sequence);
var sequenceBytesLongEnough = sequenceBytes.Concat(new byte[NumberOfBytes]);
var result = sequenceBytesLongEnough.Take(NumberOfBytes).Reverse();
return result;
}
private IEnumerable<byte> GetGuidBytes()
{
var result = Guid.NewGuid().ToByteArray().Take(10).ToArray();
return result;
}
}
答案 5 :(得分:0)
我知道这个问题很老,但如果有人有这样的问题,我建议这样的解决方案:
protected Guid GetNewId()
{
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["YourConnectionString"].ConnectionString);
var query = "select newid()";
conn.Open();
SqlCommand com = new SqlCommand(query, conn);
var guid = new Guid(com.ExecuteScalar().ToString());
conn.Close();
return guid;
}
您可以在创建新对象时从SQL数据库获取newid。对我来说它有效。 :)(但我不知道这是好习惯)
如何使用它:
var myNewGuidValue = GetNewId();
答案 6 :(得分:-1)
在使用Entity Framework Core 2.1.1时,我使用:
[Key, DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public Guid UserId { get; set; }
然后在迁移中,添加defaultValueSql参数,如下所示:
migrationBuilder.CreateTable(
name: "Users",
columns: table => new
{
UserId = table.Column<Guid>(nullable: false, defaultValueSql: "newsequentialid()"),
DisplayName = table.Column<string>(nullable: true)
},
constraints: table =>
{
table.PrimaryKey("PK_Users", x => x.UserId);
});
这可以确保sql服务器负责生成顺序的guid,这将比滚动自己的guid更好。
如果您不希望使用顺序向导的缺点,则可以使用“ newid()”代替。