var query = from i in SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
orderby i.Poprctnm descending
select new { RR = i.Poprctnm };
结果:
RR-01,
RR-01,
RR-02,
RR-02,
RR-02,
RR-TEST,
RR-TEST,
我如何在这种陈述中对RR进行分组
结果:
RR-01,
RR-02,
RR-TEST
只是进行一些修改,询问是否有可能做到这一点或你的想法?很抱歉要求太多,真的有兴趣了解更多关于linq ..如何将其转换为字符串,因为它显示真或假..布尔语句
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s =>
s.Poprctnm.StartsWith(p))
.Distinct()
.OrderBy(p => p)
.Select(p => new { RR = p })
.Take(10);
答案 0 :(得分:2)
在这种情况下,您可以使用Distinct
或GroupBy
方法
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s=> s.Poprctnm)
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(p => p)
.Select(p=> new { RR = p });
如果您使用OrderByDescending
,则结果将为
RR-TEST
RR-02
RR-01
但我认为你想要OrderBy
,那么结果将是
RR-01
RR-02
RR-TEST
请尝试以下
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans.Select(s=> s.Poprctnm)
.Distinct()
.OrderBy(p => p)
.Select(p=> new { RR = p });
答案 1 :(得分:1)
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.GroupBy(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.Select(g=>g.First())
.OrderByDescending(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.Select(x=>new { RR = x.Poprctnm });
如果您想将result
作为群组:
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.GroupBy(x=>x.Poprctnm)
.OrderByDescending(g=>g.Key);
答案 2 :(得分:1)
var result = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.Select(x => new { RR = x.Poprctnm })
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Poprctnm);
答案 3 :(得分:0)
您好像需要Distinct,而不是群组
var query = SFC.Supplies_ReceiveTrans
.Select(x => new {RR = i.Poprctnm})
.Distinct()
.OrderByDescending(i => i);