我想出了这个例子来澄清我的问题
我们从基类开始
/// <summary>
/// Just a silly example class
/// </summary>
class CFileStream
{
protected readonly string FilePath;
public CFileStream(string filePath)
{
FilePath = filePath;
}
public virtual void Write(string s)
{
var stream = GetStream(FilePath);
//etc
}
/// <summary>
/// Take filePath as an argument to make subclassing easier
/// </summary>
protected virtual FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return new FileStream(filePath, FileMode.OpenOrCreate);
}
}
为它创建一个子类
/// <summary>
/// Building on top of CFileStream, created an encrypted version
/// </summary>
class CFileStreamEncrypted : CFileStream
{
private readonly string _key;
public CFileStreamEncrypted(string filePath, string key):base(filePath)
{
_key = key;
}
/// <summary>
/// For added complexity, let's also wrap a possible excepton
/// </summary>
public override void Write(string s)
{
try
{
base.Write(s);
}
catch (ImaginaryCryptoException ex)
{
throw new ImaginaryCustomException("bladibla", ex);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Wrap the base stream in an imaginary crypto class
/// </summary>
protected override FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return new CImaginaryCryptoStream(base.GetStream(filePath), _key);
}
}
现在我们希望创建第二个子类,但是它可以与初始文件写入器以及加密版本一起使用。
第一个有意义
/// <summary>
/// Building on top of CFileStream, created an auto-split version
/// </summary>
class CFileStreamSplit : CFileStream
{
public CFileStreamSplit(string filePath)
: base(filePath)
{
}
protected int Counter;
/// <summary>
/// Close stream and move to next file at the appropriate time(s)
/// </summary>
public override void Write(string s)
{
do
{
Stream stream;
if (ImaginaryBooleanMustSplit)
stream = GetStream(FilePath);
//etc
} while (ImaginaryBooleanDataLeftToWrite);
}
/// <summary>
/// Get base stream but with altered filePath
/// </summary>
protected override FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return base.GetStream(GetNextpath(filePath));
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore proper extension / file-exists etc.
/// </summary>
protected virtual string GetNextpath(string filePath)
{
return filePath + ++Counter;
}
}
第二个(在此之下)是完全重复的代码,除了现在还需要加密密钥的构造函数。
/// <summary>
/// Build the same auto-split version but this time on top of the encrypted subclass
/// </summary>
class CFileStreamSplitEncrypted : CFileStreamEncrypted
{
public CFileStreamSplitEncrypted(string filePath, string key)
: base(filePath, key)
{
}
/*
* Note that there are no changes below this line
*/
protected int Counter;
/// <summary>
/// Close stream and move to next file at the appropriate time(s)
/// </summary>
public override void Write(string s)
{
do
{
Stream stream;
if (ImaginaryBooleanMustSplit)
stream = GetStream(FilePath);
//etc
} while (ImaginaryBooleanDataLeftToWrite);
}
/// <summary>
/// Get base stream but with altered filePath
/// </summary>
protected override FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return base.GetStream(GetNextpath(filePath));
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore proper extension / file-exists etc.
/// </summary>
protected virtual string GetNextpath(string filePath)
{
return filePath + ++Counter;
}
}
当然有很多方法可以减少重复代码的数量,但是如果有这样的话,我还没有找到“最好的”方式。所以;在您的观点/体验中,解决这个问题的最耗时,最干净,最灵活的方法是什么?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
对于不同的修改,一个体面的方法可能是继承的组合。设置你的类只负责一件事,在构造上接受一个基本流。
interface ICFileStream
{
void Write(string s);
FileStream GetStream(string filePath);
}
/// <summary>
/// Just a silly example class
/// </summary>
class CFileStream: ICFileStream
{
protected readonly string FilePath;
public CFileStream(string filePath)
{
FilePath = filePath;
}
public void Write(string s)
{
var stream = GetStream(FilePath);
//etc
}
/// <summary>
/// Take filePath as an argument to make subclassing easier
/// </summary>
protected FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return new FileStream(filePath, FileMode.OpenOrCreate);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Building on top of CFileStream, created an encrypted version
/// </summary>
class CFileStreamEncrypted : ICFileStream
{
private readonly string _key;
private readonly ICFileStream _stream;
public CFileStreamEncrypted(string key, ICFileStream stream)
{
_key = key;
_stream = stream;
}
/// <summary>
/// For added complexity, let's also wrap a possible excepton
/// </summary>
public void Write(string s)
{
try
{
_stream.Write(s);
}
catch (ImaginaryCryptoException ex)
{
throw new ImaginaryCustomException("bladibla", ex);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Wrap the base stream in an imaginary crypto class
/// </summary>
protected FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return new CImaginaryCryptoStream(_stream.GetStream(filePath), _key);
}
}
class CFileStreamSplit : ICFileStream
{
private readonly ICFileStream _stream;
public CFileStreamSplit(ICFileStream stream)
{
_stream = stream;
}
protected int Counter;
/// <summary>
/// Close stream and move to next file at the appropriate time(s)
/// </summary>
public void Write(string s)
{
do
{
Stream stream;
if (ImaginaryBooleanMustSplit)
stream = GetStream(FilePath);
//etc
} while (ImaginaryBooleanDataLeftToWrite);
}
/// <summary>
/// Get base stream but with altered filePath
/// </summary>
protected FileStream GetStream(string filePath)
{
return _stream.GetStream(GetNextpath(filePath));
}
/// <summary>
/// Ignore proper extension / file-exists etc.
/// </summary>
protected string GetNextpath(string filePath)
{
return filePath + ++Counter;
}
}
所以当你想要一个分裂加密文件流时:
new CFileStreamSplit(new CFileStreamEncrypted("crypto-awesome-key", new CFileStream("C:\\blah...")));
这样更灵活,因此当您想要添加LoggingCFileStream时,您不需要为每个组合添加单独的类。