在GHC中编译此程序时:
import Control.Monad
f x = let
g y = let
h z = liftM not x
in h 0
in g 0
我收到错误:
test.hs:5:21:
Could not deduce (m ~ m1)
from the context (Monad m)
bound by the inferred type of f :: Monad m => m Bool -> m Bool
at test.hs:(3,1)-(7,8)
or from (m Bool ~ m1 Bool, Monad m1)
bound by the inferred type of
h :: (m Bool ~ m1 Bool, Monad m1) => t1 -> m1 Bool
at test.hs:5:5-21
`m' is a rigid type variable bound by
the inferred type of f :: Monad m => m Bool -> m Bool
at test.hs:3:1
`m1' is a rigid type variable bound by
the inferred type of
h :: (m Bool ~ m1 Bool, Monad m1) => t1 -> m1 Bool
at test.hs:5:5
Expected type: m1 Bool
Actual type: m Bool
In the second argument of `liftM', namely `x'
In the expression: liftM not x
In an equation for `h': h z = liftM not x
为什么呢?此外,为f
(f :: Monad m => m Bool -> m Bool
)提供显式类型签名会使错误消失。但这与Haskell根据错误消息自动推断f
的类型完全相同!
答案 0 :(得分:5)
实际上,这非常简单。推断的let
- 绑定变量的类型被隐式推广到类型方案,所以你的方式有一个量词。广义类型h
是:
h :: forall a m. (Monad m) => a -> m Bool
f
的广义类型是:
f :: forall m. (Monad m) => m Bool -> m Bool
他们不是m
。如果你这样写,你会得到基本相同的错误:
f :: (Monad m) => m Bool -> m Bool
f x = let
g y = let
h :: (Monad m) => a -> m Bool
h z = liftM not x
in h 0
in g 0
你可以通过启用“范围类型变量”扩展来修复它:
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
f :: forall m. (Monad m) => m Bool -> m Bool
f x = let
g y = let
h :: a -> m Bool
h z = liftM not x
in h 0
in g 0
或通过禁用let
- 使用“单态本地绑定”扩展名MonoLocalBinds
进行泛化。