为什么第一次将对象添加到ArrayList或LinkedList需要更多时间?
我正在测试ArrayList和LinkedList的性能。结果是我的预期。 ArrayList通常更适合随机访问,每次插入LinkedList都需要相似的时间。但我发现将对象添加到ArrayList或LinkedList 的第一次比其他时间需要更多的时间。
我在Mac和Linux上测试了代码,情况类似。您可以从here下载代码和完整结果。
java PlayArrayList
0 to 10, elapsedTime: 716362
10 to 20, elapsedTime: 19765
20 to 30, elapsedTime: 10895
$ java PlayLinkedList
0 to 10, elapsedTime: 704209
10 to 20, elapsedTime: 5867
20 to 30, elapsedTime: 5378
PS:它们以纳秒为单位测量。
/* Untilty Class for measuring elapsed time */
public class BenmarkTimer {
private long startTime;
private long endTime;
/* Getter */
public long getStartTime(){
return startTime;
}
public long getEndTime(){
return endTime;
}
/* Setter */
private void setStartTime(long t){
startTime = t;
}
private void setEndTime(long t){
endTime = t;
}
/* Method */
public void start(){
setStartTime(System.nanoTime());
}
public long end(){
setEndTime(System.nanoTime());
return getDuration();
}
public void cancel(){
setStartTime(0);
setEndTime(0);
}
public long getDuration(){
return getEndTime() - getStartTime();
}
/* Unit testing */
public static void main (String [] args){
BenmarkTimer timer = new BenmarkTimer();
timer.start();
System.out.println("Hello, World for timer");
timer.end();
long t = timer.getDuration();
System.out.println("Start time "+ timer.getStartTime());
System.out.println("End time "+ timer.getEndTime());
System.out.println("Elaped time "+ t);
}
}
import java.util.*;
public class PlayArrayList{
private int itemCount;
private BenmarkTimer timer;
private List<Integer> list;
public PlayArrayList(){
itemCount = 0;
timer = new BenmarkTimer();
list = getList();
}
public long addTenIntegers(){
timer.start();
for (int i=itemCount; i<(itemCount + 10); i++ ) {
list.add(i);
}
long elapsedTime = timer.end();
itemCount += 10;
return elapsedTime;
}
public long randomRemove(){
Random r = new Random();
int s = list.size();
int i = r.nextInt(s);
timer.start();
list.remove(i);
return timer.end();
}
public String toString(){
return list.toString();
}
/* Factory method */
protected List<Integer> getList(){
return new ArrayList<Integer>();
}
public static void main (String [] args){
PlayArrayList playAList = new PlayArrayList();
/* Add 99 integers */
long elapsedTime;
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
elapsedTime = playAList.addTenIntegers();
System.out.print(i*10 + " to " + (i*10+10));
System.out.println(", elapsedTime: "+ elapsedTime);
}
System.out.println("Array content");
System.out.println(playAList.toString());
/* Remove 99 integer */
for (int i=0; i<99; i++){
elapsedTime = playAList.randomRemove();
System.out.print("Remove a integer");
System.out.println(", elapsedTime: "+ elapsedTime);
}
}
}
import java.util.*;
public class PlayLinkedList extends PlayArrayList{
/* Factory method */
@Override
protected List<Integer> getList(){
return new LinkedList<Integer>();
}
public static void main (String [] args){
PlayLinkedList playAList = new PlayLinkedList();
/* Add 99 integers */
long elapsedTime;
for (int i=0; i<10; i++){
elapsedTime = playAList.addTenIntegers();
System.out.print(i*10 + " to " + (i*10+10));
System.out.println(", elapsedTime: "+ elapsedTime);
}
System.out.println("Array content");
System.out.println(playAList.toString());
/* Remove 99 integer */
for (int i=0; i<99; i++){
elapsedTime = playAList.randomRemove();
System.out.print("Remove a integer");
System.out.println(", elapsedTime: "+ elapsedTime);
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我想这个问题的主要原因是来自here的规则4,即新类的初始化效果。我首先创建了另一个对象来执行初始化操作。第一次使用的类总是需要更长的初始化时间。之后,操作的持续时间将会短得多。
PlayArrayList playAListInit = new PlayArrayList();
long firstTime = playAListInit.addTenIntegers();
System.out.println("First time: "+ firstTime);
PlayArrayList playAList = new PlayArrayList();
然后结果如下:
java PlayArrayList
First time: 710000
0 to 10, elapsedTime: 6000
10 to 20, elapsedTime: 12000
20 to 30, elapsedTime: 9000