我正在尝试定义一个递归方法,该方法删除单链接列表中等于目标值的所有实例。我定义了一个remove方法和一个附带的removeAux方法。如何改变这一点,如果需要移除头部,头部也会被重新分配?以下是我到目前为止的情况:
public class LinkedList<T extends Comparable<T>> {
private class Node {
private T data;
private Node next;
private Node(T data) {
this.data = data;
next = null;
}
}
private Node head;
public LinkedList() {
head = null;
}
public void remove(T target) {
if (head == null) {
return;
}
while (target.compareTo(head.data) == 0) {
head = head.next;
}
removeAux(target, head, null);
}
public void removeAux(T target, Node current, Node previous) {
if (target.compareTo(current.data) == 0) {
if (previous == null) {
head = current.next;
} else {
previous.next = current.next;
}
current = current.next;
removeAux(target, current, previous); // previous doesn't change
} else {
removeAux(target, current.next, current);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我更喜欢在您删除之前切换前一个类似
之前切换的引用public void remove(T target){
removeAux(target,head, null);
}
public void removeAux(T target, Node current, Node previous) {
//case base
if(current == null)
return;
if (target.compareTo(current.data) == 0) {
if (previous == null) {
// is the head
head = current.next;
} else {
//is not the head
previous.next = current.next;
}
current = current.next;
removeAux(target, current, previous); // previous doesn't change
} else {
removeAux(target, current.next, current);
}
}
检查此答案graphically linked list可能会帮助您思考如何实施它。 如果这对培训是好的,但你可以迭代的方式做。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
你可以试着塑造你的功能,使它像这样工作。
head = removeAux(target, head); // returns new head
我从Coursera的算法课中学到的一个巧妙的技巧。
其余代码如下。
public void removeAux(T target, Node current) {
//case base
if(current == null)
return null;
current.next = removeAux(target, current.next);
return target.compareTo(current.data) == 0? current.next: current; // the actual deleting happens here
}