我正在尝试在我的日志记录类中实现自己的流操纵器。它基本上是改变旗帜状态的终点操纵器。但是,当我尝试使用它时,我会得到:
ftypes.cpp:57: error: no match for ‘operator<<’ in ‘log->Log::debug() << log->Log::endl’
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/ostream.tcc:67: note: candidates are: std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::operator<<(std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& (*)(std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&)) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/ostream.tcc:78: note: std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::operator<<(std::basic_ios<_CharT, _Traits>& (*)(std::basic_ios<_CharT, _Traits>&)) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/ostream.tcc:90: note: std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>::operator<<(std::ios_base& (*)(std::ios_base&)) [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]
...
代码:
class Log {
public:
...
std::ostream& debug() { return log(logDEBUG); }
std::ostream& endl(std::ostream& out); // manipulator
...
private:
...
std::ofstream m_logstream;
bool m_newLine;
...
}
std::ostream& Log::endl(std::ostream& out)
{
out << std::endl;
m_newLine = true;
return out;
}
std::ostream& Log::log(const TLogLevel level)
{
if (level > m_logLevel) return m_nullstream;
if (m_newLine)
{
m_logstream << timestamp() << "|" << logLevelString(level) << "|";
m_newLine = false;
}
return m_logstream;
}
当我尝试调用它时,我收到错误:
log->debug() << "START - object created" << log->endl;
(log是指向Log对象的指针)
有什么想法吗?我怀疑它在某种程度上与操纵者实际上在课堂内的事实有关,但这只是我猜测的......
干杯,
汤姆
编辑:由于限制格式化,将此放在此处而不是评论。 我试图实现我的streambuf,它有一个例外:当我尝试打开filebuf进行追加时,它失败了。输出效果很好,只是附加不是出于某种未知原因。如果我尝试直接使用ofstream并附加它可行。知道为什么吗? - 工作原理:
std::ofstream test;
test.open("somefile", std::ios_base::app);
if (!test) throw LogIoEx("Cannon open file for logging");
test << "test" << std::endl;
正确追加“测试”。
不起作用:
std::filebuf *fbuf = new std::filebuf();
if (!fbuf->open("somefile", std::ios_base::app)) throw LogIoEx("Cannon open file for logging");
抛出异常,如果我将openmode设置为out然后它可以工作..
干杯
答案 0 :(得分:5)
定义了operator<<(ostream &, ostream &(*)(ostream&))
但未定义operator<<(ostream &, ostream &(Log::*)(ostream&))
。也就是说,如果操纵器是普通(非成员)函数,它将起作用,但由于它依赖于Log
的实例,因此正常的重载将不起作用。
要解决此问题,您可能需要将log->endl
作为辅助对象的实例,并在使用operator<<
推送时调用相应的代码。
像这样:
class Log {
class ManipulationHelper { // bad name for the class...
public:
typedef ostream &(Log::*ManipulatorPointer)(ostream &);
ManipulationHelper(Log *logger, ManipulatorPointer func) :
logger(logger),
func(func) {
}
friend ostream &operator<<(ostream &stream, ManipulationHelper helper) {
// call func on logger
return (helper.logger)->*(helper.func)(stream);
}
Log *logger;
ManipulatorPointer func;
}
friend class ManipulationHelper;
public:
// ...
ManipulationHelper endl;
private:
// ...
std::ostream& make_endl(std::ostream& out); // renamed
};
// ...
Log::Log(...) {
// ...
endl(this, make_endl) {
// ...
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
这不是操纵者的工作方式 - 这完全取决于类型。你想要的是:
class Log {
...
struct endl_tag { /* tag struct; no members */ };
static const struct endl_tag endl;
...
LogStream &debug() { /* somehow produce a LogStream type here */ }
}
LogStream &operator<<(LogStream &s, const struct endl_tag &) {
s.m_newLine = true;
}
请注意:
Log
的一部分,因此我们无法使用通用std::ostream
。毕竟,std::cout << Log->endl()
意味着什么?所以你需要创建一个派生自std::ostream
的新流类型(我把它留在这里,但假设它名为LogStream
)。endl
实际上并没有做任何事情;所有工作都在operator<<
。它的唯一目的是让正确的operator<<
重载运行。那就是说,你不应该定义新的操纵器和流类,如果你可以避免它,因为它变得复杂:)你能用std::endl
做你需要的东西,并包裹{{ 1}}围绕您自己的自定义streambuf
?这就是如何使用C ++ IO库。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
试试这个:
#include <iostream>
class Log
{
public:
class LogEndl
{
/*
* A class for manipulating a stream that is associated with a log.
*/
public:
LogEndl(Log& p)
:parent(p)
{}
private:
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& str,Log::LogEndl const& end);
Log& parent;
};
std::ostream& debug() {return std::cout;}
/*
* You are not quite using manipulators the way they are entended.
* But I wanted to give an example that was close to your original
*
* So return an object that has an operator << that knows what to do.
* To feed back info to the Log it need to keep track of who its daddy is.
*/
LogEndl endl() {return LogEndl(*this);}
private:
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& str,Log::LogEndl const& end);
bool endOfLine;
};
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& str,Log::LogEndl const& end)
{
// Stick stuff on the stream here.
str << std::endl;
// Make any notes you need in the log class here.
end.parent.endOfLine = true;
return str;
};
int main()
{
Log log;
/*
* Please note the use of objects rather than pointers here
* It may help
*/
log.debug() << "Debug " << log.endl();
}