我正在处理一个涉及多个if和elif conditining的问题。我的情况如下:
if len(g) == 2:
a = 'rea: 300'
b = 'ref: "%s": {"sds": 200},"%s": {"sds": 300}' % (g[0],g[1])
elif len(g) == 3:
a = 'rea: 400'
b = 'ref: "%s": {"sds": 200},"%s": {"sds": 300},"%s": {"sds": 400}' % (g[0],g[1],g[2])
....
这个elif条件应该是elif len(g)== 99 ...所以我想应该有一些优雅的方法来做到这一点。此外,如果您观察到,有一种模式,'rea'和'ref'正在进行中,可以表示为:
if len(g) == x:
a = 'rea: (x*100)+100'
b = 'ref: "%s": {"sds": 200},"%s": {"sds": 300},"%s": {"sds": (x*100)+100}' % (g[0],g[1],g[2])
答案 0 :(得分:2)
也许是这样的:
g_len = len(g)
a = "rea: {}".format((g_len + 1) * 100)
b = "ref: "
for i, g_i in enumerate(g):
b += ' "{}": {{"sds": {}}},'.format(g_i, (i+2) * 100)
答案 1 :(得分:2)
试试这个方法:
def func(g):
if not 1 < len(g) < 100:
raise ValueError('inadequate length')
d = {x:{'sds':(i+2)*100} for i, x in enumerate(g)}
a = 'rea: %s00' % (len(g)+1)
b = 'ref: %s' % str(d)[1:-1]
return (a, b)
我不知道你为什么要创建一个看起来非常像字典的字符串b
,但我相信你有理由......
>>> func(range(3))
('rea: 400', "ref: 0: {'sds': 200}, 1: {'sds': 300}, 2: {'sds': 400}")
答案 2 :(得分:0)
使用字典:
x = 100
d = {}
for i in xrange(2, len(g)+1):
d[i] = ['rea: {}'.format(100+x*i), 'ref: '+ ('%s: {"sds": 200}, ' *(i-1) + ' %s: {"sds": 200}') % tuple(g[:i])]
现在,d看起来像:
{2: ['rea: 300',
'ref: "depends_on_g": {"sds": 200}, "depends_on_g": {"sds": 300}'],
3: ['rea: 400',
'ref: "depends_on_g": {"sds": 200}, "depends_on_g": {"sds": 300}', "depends_on_g": {"sds": 300}]
...
}
然后,访问它:
a, b = d.get(len(g))
不需要if语句:)
答案 3 :(得分:-1)
就个人而言,当我知道长度如下时,我会选择功能性的东西:
def do_Condition(g):
""" Condtion the result based on the length of g """
l = len(g)
a = 'rea: %d' % (100 + 100*l)
items = ['ref: "%s"' % (g[0])]
n = 100
for i in g[1:]:
n += 100
items.append('{"sds": %d},"%s"' % (n, i))
b = ': '.join(items)
return (a, b)
答案 4 :(得分:-1)
这似乎有效:
a = 'rea: %d00' % (len(g)+1)
b = ",".join(['ref: "%s": {"sds": %d00}' % (i, j) for i, j in zip(g, range(2,len(g)+2))])