在我的实验中,当多个XExpression块之间存在一系列依赖关系时,似乎XText无法解析变量类型。
一个最小的例子,来说明。我有一个语法:
grammar eg.types.inference.TypeInferenceExample with org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.Xbase
generate typeInferenceExample "example.org/types/inference/TypeInferenceExample"
Model:
blocks += Block*
;
Block:
'{'
'name' ':' name=QualifiedName
'from' ':' ('none' | from=[Block|QualifiedName])
'block' ':' expression=XBlockExpression
'}'
;
界面:
package eg.lib;
public interface IModelBlock {
public void push(org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib.Pair<String, ?> toPush);
}
和JvmModelInferrer:
package eg.types.inference.jvmmodel
import com.google.inject.Inject
import eg.lib.IModelBlock
import eg.types.inference.typeInferenceExample.Block
import eg.types.inference.typeInferenceExample.Model
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.XBinaryOperation
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.XExpression
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.XFeatureCall
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.XStringLiteral
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.jvmmodel.AbstractModelInferrer
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.jvmmodel.IJvmDeclaredTypeAcceptor
import org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.jvmmodel.JvmTypesBuilder
class TypeInferenceExampleJvmModelInferrer extends AbstractModelInferrer {
@Inject extension JvmTypesBuilder
def dispatch void infer(Model model, IJvmDeclaredTypeAcceptor acceptor, boolean isPreIndexingPhase) {
model.blocks.forEach [block |
acceptor.accept(block.toClass(block.name)).initializeLater [
superTypes += block.newTypeRef(typeof(IModelBlock))
members += block.toMethod("invoke", newTypeRef(Void::TYPE)) [
if (block.from != null) {
block.from.pushType.forEach [p |
parameters += block.toParameter(p.key, p.value)
]
}
body = block.expression
]
]
]
}
def private pushType(Block block) {
return block.eAllContents.filter[ // List of push calls in this Block
it instanceof XFeatureCall && (it as XFeatureCall).concreteSyntaxFeatureName.equals("push")
].map [
val call = it as XFeatureCall
// Add entry for push call as an OutputDeclaration
return call.featureCallArguments.map[
if (!(it instanceof XBinaryOperation)) {
throw new RuntimeException("Must push using -> operator")
}
val key = (it as XBinaryOperation).leftOperand
val value = (it as XBinaryOperation).rightOperand
return key.name -> value.inferredType
]
].head
}
def private String name(XExpression literal) {
if (!(literal instanceof XStringLiteral)) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Literal was not a string literal")
}
return (literal as XStringLiteral).value
}
}
当我为此DSL创建一个简单示例时,例如:
{
name : BlockOne
from : none
block : {
val i = 42 * 3.6
push("index" -> i)
}
}
{
name : BlockTwo
from : BlockOne
block : {
val res = "Another Value from " + index
push("result" -> res)
}
}
生成代码很好(类型推断在生成输出Java时成功地计算出index
和res
的类型。我在push
的{{1}}调用中使用对来推断BlockOne
的调用方法的接口。此BlockTwo
方法来自上面的push
界面。如果我在这个例子中添加第三个块,那么:
IModelBlock
推断失败,{
name : BlockThree
from : BlockTwo
block : {
val out = "This one came from: " + result
push("out" -> out)
}
}
(来自UnsupportedOperationException: TODO: import a functional handle on the type resolution that delegates to the best available (current, but evolving) result
,OnChangeEvictingCache.execWithoutCacheClear
)。
我是否应该使用其他一些技术来推导在XText中具有链式依赖关系的变量类型?
感谢您的帮助!
答案 0 :(得分:-1)
这似乎是您使用的版本中的错误。尝试使用最新版本。