我在SQL Server 2005上,我收到一个错误,我很确定不应该这样做。
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Procedure spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser, Line 8 Subquery
returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery
follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
我正在关注示例#B on this MSDN链接。
我存储的proc代码如下。如果您要求,我可以为这篇文章简化它:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser]
@strUserName varchar(50)
,@bitQuickSearch bit = 0
AS
BEGIN
SELECT [intSearchID] ,strSearchTypeCode ,[strSearchName]
FROM [tblAdminSearches]
WHERE
strUserName = @strUserName
AND
strSearchTypeCode
IN (
CASE @bitQuickSearch
WHEN 1 THEN 'Quick'
ELSE (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes)
END
)
ORDER BY strSearchName
END
我已经检查过子查询的结果集与子查询结果与之比较的strSearchTypeCode之间没有数据类型不匹配。
我认为没有理由不这样做。如果您有任何线索,请告诉我。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
尝试重新排列查询,以便布尔表达式出现在子选择内,例如
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser]
@strUserName varchar(50)
,@bitQuickSearch bit = 0
AS
BEGIN
SELECT [intSearchID] ,strSearchTypeCode ,[strSearchName]
FROM [tblAdminSearches]
WHERE
strUserName = @strUserName
AND
strSearchTypeCode
IN (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes where @bitQuickSearch=0
UNION
SELECT 'Quick' AS strSearchTypeCode WHERE @bitQuickSearch=1)
ORDER BY strSearchName
END
答案 1 :(得分:2)
我不知道你可以像这样使用IN子句中的CASE语句。我建议将这一点改写为:
WHERE strUserName = @strUserName AND (
(@bitQuickSearch = 1 AND strSearchTypeCode = 'Quick')
OR
(strSearchTypeCode IN (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes))
)
或者,如果你真的喜欢那里的风格:
WHERE strUserName = @strUserName
AND strSearchTypeCode IN (
SELECT CASE @bitQuickSearch WHEN 1 THEN 'Quick' ELSE strSearchTypeCode END
FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes
)
一般情况下,如果@bitQuickSearch = 1,SQL应该足够智能,以便优化表格。但是,我只是确定查询计划(信任,但验证)。
答案 2 :(得分:2)
在我看来,这个SELECT:
SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes
返回多行,这就是你的问题。您可以将其重写为:
SELECT TOP 1 strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes