我正在尝试使用本地指针来访问当前线程具有亲和力的内存。
不幸的是,我的本地指针似乎没有指出我认为应该在哪里。
任何人都知道出了什么问题?
编辑:我忘了提到下面的输出是使用四个线程运行此代码生成的,即THREADS = 4
。
我的代码:
#include <upc.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(){
shared int * T = (shared int *) upc_all_alloc(12, sizeof(int));
if(!T)
upc_global_exit(-1);
int i;
upc_forall(i=0; i<12; i++; &T[i]) T[i] = i;
upc_barrier;
if(MYTHREAD == 0)
for(i=0; i<12; i++) printf("thread %d, T[%d] = %d\n", MYTHREAD, i, T[i]);
upc_barrier;
int my_start = (12/THREADS + 1)*MYTHREAD;
int my_end = (12/THREADS + 1)*(MYTHREAD+1) - 1;
int* T_local = (int*)&T[my_start];
for(i=my_start; i<=my_end; i++)
printf("thread %d, T_local[%d] = %d, T[%d] = %d\n", MYTHREAD,
i-my_start, T_local[i-my_start], i, T[i]);
upc_barrier;
return 0;
}
输出(THREADS = 4
):
thread 0, T[0] = 0
thread 0, T[1] = 1
thread 0, T[2] = 2
thread 0, T[3] = 3
thread 0, T[4] = 4
thread 0, T[5] = 5
thread 0, T[6] = 6
thread 0, T[7] = 7
thread 0, T[8] = 8
thread 0, T[9] = 9
thread 0, T[10] = 10
thread 0, T[11] = 11
thread 0, T_local[0] = 0, T[0] = 0
thread 0, T_local[1] = 4, T[1] = 1
thread 0, T_local[2] = 8, T[2] = 2
thread 0, T_local[3] = 0, T[3] = 3
thread 1, T_local[0] = 4, T[4] = 4
thread 1, T_local[1] = 8, T[5] = 5
thread 1, T_local[2] = 0, T[6] = 6
thread 2, T_local[0] = 8, T[8] = 8
thread 2, T_local[1] = 0, T[9] = 9
thread 2, T_local[2] = 0, T[10] = 10
thread 2, T_local[3] = 0, T[11] = 11
thread 3, T_local[0] = 0, T[12] = 0
thread 3, T_local[1] = 0, T[13] = 0
thread 3, T_local[2] = 0, T[14] = 0
thread 3, T_local[3] = 0, T[15] = 0
thread 1, T_local[3] = 0, T[7] = 7
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您的数组T使用循环布局进行分配和声明(即blocksize == 1)。这意味着与MYTHREAD具有亲和力的第一个元素就是T [MYTHREAD]。因此,您应该按如下方式初始化指向本地的指针:
int* T_local = (int*)&T[MYTHREAD];
在循环布局中,共享元素循环传递给线程,这意味着每个线程具有分布式数组元素的非连续块。因此,例如对于4个线程,线程0将具有与T [0],T [4]和T [8]的亲和性。线程0上正确初始化的T_local指向本地的指针将访问共享数组的本地片中的这些元素(分别为T_local [0],T_local [1]和T_local [2])。
你对my_start和my_end的计算似乎假设了一个与T实际使用的不同(更大)的阻塞因子,这可能是你混淆的原因。