假设我最初使用CRTP进行以下设计:
template<class Outputter> class Generator {
protected:
vector<int> v;
private:
void work(ostream& out) {
// perform first part of some complex operations on v
out << *static_cast<Outputter *>(this);
// perform second part of some complex operations on v
out << *static_cast<Outputter *>(this);
// many more ....
// perform some final actions
}
public:
Generator(unsigned length): v(length) {}
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, Outputter&& generator) {
// perform some preparation work
work(out);
// perform some final actions
return out;
}
};
class SimpleDumpOutputter : public Generator<SimpleDumpOutputter> {
private:
unsigned count;
public:
SimpleDumpOutputter(unsigned length): Generator(length), count() {}
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, SimpleDumpOutputter& outputter) {
out << "Step " << ++count << " of calculation: "
copy(outputter.v.begin(), outputter.v.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(out, " "));
out << endl;
return out;
}
};
class FancyOutputter : public Generator<FancyOutputter> { // create a graph using graphviz's dot language to visualise v
private:
// abbreviated
public:
FancyOutputter(unsigned length): Generator(length) {}
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, FancyOutputter& outputter) {
// write statements to out
return out;
}
};
// some more different Outputters, for example an Outputter that creates a pretty LaTeX document
在此设计中,有一个Generator
CRTP类模板,可以对vector<int> v
执行复杂的计算,并使用派生类的友好operator<<
在计算的每个步骤/部分打印结果
这是一个我想要实现的有趣概念:我希望在一次执行中以多种格式输出。具体来说,我以为我能做到:
template<class Outputters> class AggregateOutputter : public Generator<AggregateOutputter<Outputters...> > {
private:
static const unsigned outputter_count = sizeof...(Outputters);
typedef array<ostream *, outputter_count> DestArr;
DestArr destinations;
public:
AggregateOutputter(unsigned v_length, DestArr destinations): IsomerGenerator<AggregateOutputter<Outputters...> >(length), destinations(destinations) {}
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream&, AggregateOutputter& outputter); // first argument is dummy, because we would use the ostreams in destinations
}
这个想法是,用户会使用AggregateOutputter<SimpleDumpOutputter, FancyOutputter
并使用array
两个ostream
构建对象。每当Generator
在输出类上调用operator<<
时,AggregateOutputter
将遍历ostream
中的destinations
和Outputters
中的类型并调用类似于*dest_iter << *static_cast<Outputter_Iter>(this);
。
我不确定这会如何起作用。我不确定是否可以这种方式使用多重继承,是否可以在array
和一组参数化类型之间“压缩”。在这种情况下有人知道吗?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我修改了你的原创设计。我认为当调用输出操作符时,Generator会做一堆计算,这至少可以说是令人惊讶的。此外,您的AggregateOutputter输出以忽略&lt;&lt;的详细信息也令人惊讶。此外,Outputter与Generator没有is-a关系。
我试图将问题分开,最后没有使用CRTP,而是使用可变参数模板,但我认为它可以满足您的需求。
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <array>
using namespace std;
class Generator {
protected:
vector<int> v;
public:
Generator(unsigned length): v(length) {}
template<class Outputter>
void do_calculations_with_output(Outputter& out){
// perform first part of some complex operations on v
out.output(v);
// perform second part of some complex operations on v
out.output(v);
// perform some final actions
}
};
class SimpleDumpOutputter {
private:
ostream* out;
unsigned count;
public:
SimpleDumpOutputter(ostream& os): out(&os), count() {}
template<class C>
void output(const C& c) {
*out << "Step " << ++count << " of calculation: ";
copy(c.begin(),c.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(*out, " "));
*out << endl;
}
};
class FancyOutputter {
ostream* out;
int count;
public:
FancyOutputter(ostream& os): out(&os),count() {}
template<class C>
void output(const C& c) {
// create a graph using graphviz's dot language to ease visualisation of v
*out << "Step " << ++count << " of calculation: ";
*out << "Graphviz output\n";
}
};
template<class... Outputters> class AggregateOutputter : private Outputters... {
private:
template<class First, class... Rest>
struct output_helper{
template<class C>
static void do_output(AggregateOutputter* pthis,const C& c){
static_cast<First*>(pthis)->output(c);
output_helper<Rest...>::do_output(pthis,c);
}
};
template<class First>
struct output_helper<First>{
template<class C>
static void do_output(AggregateOutputter* pthis,const C& c){
static_cast<First*>(pthis)->output(c);
}
};
public:
template<class... Out>
AggregateOutputter( Out&... out): Outputters(out)...{}
template<class C>
void output(const C& c) {
output_helper<Outputters...>::do_output(this,c);
}
};
int main(){
AggregateOutputter<FancyOutputter,SimpleDumpOutputter> out(cout,cout);
Generator g(10);
g.do_calculations_with_output(out);
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
好的,这是我在John Bandela的解决方案here的启发下提出的解决方案。 (请参阅我对答案的评论,为什么我认为他的方法不符合我的需要)
template<class... Outputters> class AggregateOutputter : public Generator<AggregateOutputter<Outputters...> > {
private:
typedef array<ostream *, sizeof...(Outputters)> DestArr;
DestArr destinations;
typedef typename DestArr::iterator DestArrIter;
struct OutputterHolder : public Outputters... {
OutputterHolder(vector<int>& v): Outputters(v)... {}
} outputter_holder;
template<class First, class... Rest> struct OutputHelper {
static void do_output(OutputterHolder *pthis, DestArrIter dest) {
**dest << *static_cast<First *>(pthis);
OutputHelper<Rest...>::do_output(pthis, ++dest);
}
};
template<class First> struct OutputHelper<First> {
static void do_output(OutputterHolder *pthis, DestArrIter dest) {
**dest << *static_cast<First *>(pthis);
}
};
public:
template<typename... OstreamStar> AggregateOutputter(unsigned length, OstreamStar... ostreams): Generator<AggregateOutputter<Outputters...> >(length), destinations{{ostreams...}}, outputter_holder(this->v) {
static_assert(sizeof...(OstreamStar) == sizeof...(Outputters), "number of outputters and destinations do not match");
}
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& dummy_out, AggregateOutputter& outputter) {
OutputHelper<Outputters...>::do_output(&outputter.outputter_holder, outputter.destinations.begin());
// possibly write some logging info to dummy_out
return dummy_out;
}
};
// to use this:
ofstream fout("gv.gv");
cout << AggregateOutputter<FancyOutputter, SimpleDumpOutputter>(length, &fout, &cout);
这个想法是除了John的答案中的output_helper
(我已将其重命名为OutputHelper
)之外,还有另一个名为struct
的辅助OutputterHolder
,它继承了来自所有Outputters
。我还使用array
ostream *
来存储输出的目的地,并修改do_output
也使用iterator
以便正确的ostream
可以匹配。
重要的是,为了配合更改,我已将vector<int> v
中受保护的成员Generator
更改为引用,即vector<int>& v
,以便outputter_holder
中的数据结构可以指代AggregateOutputter
中的结构。这还需要在所有输出器中添加另一个构造函数,该构造函数需要vector<int>&
。长度为v
的原始构造函数现在将使用new
分配内存。
我不确定我提出的这个解决方案是最好/最优雅的解决方案。