我有一张桌子partenaire
。 partenaire可能有一个或多个地址。当然,一个地址可能“属于”不止一个partenaire。所以我有3个表:partenaire
,partenaire_adresse
和adresse
。地址只有一个城镇(法语为ville
)所以我在表id_ville
中有一个外键addresse
。
SELECT
p.nom,
v.nom, v.id_region as id_r, v.id_departement as id_p,
r.description as region
FROM partenaire p
JOIN partenaire_adresse pa
ON pa.id_partenaire=p.id
JOIN adresse a
ON a.id=pa.id_adresse
JOIN ville v
ON v.id=a.id_ville
JOIN region r
ON v.id_region=r.id
LIMIT 4;
这给了我这些结果:
+----------------------------+-------------+------+------+--------+
| nom | nom | id_r | id_p | region |
+----------------------------+-------------+------+------+--------+
| Ferme Auberge Christlesgut | Breitenbach | 1 | 2 | Alsace |
| Alice Pizza | Strasbourg | 1 | 1 | Alsace |
| Au Vieux Cellier | Strasbourg | 1 | 1 | Alsace |
| Auberge du 7Eme Art | Strasbourg | 1 | 1 | Alsace |
+----------------------------+-------------+------+------+--------+
现在,如果我在最后一个表格LEFT OUTER JOIN
上执行region
,结果就不一样了:
SELECT
p.nom,
v.nom, v.id_region as id_r, v.id_departement as id_p,
r.description as region
FROM partenaire p
JOIN partenaire_adresse pa
ON pa.id_partenaire=p.id
JOIN adresse a
ON a.id=pa.id_adresse
JOIN ville v
ON v.id=a.id_ville
LEFT OUTER JOIN region r
ON v.id_region=r.id
LIMIT 4;
结果不一样。参见:
+---------------------+----------+------+------+----------------+
| nom | nom | id_r | id_p | region |
+---------------------+----------+------+------+----------------+
| 'Le 144' Petrossian | Paris 18 | 12 | 43 | Île-de-France |
| 'Le 144' Petrossian | Paris 08 | 12 | 43 | Île-de-France |
| 'O'Quai' | Vouvray | 7 | 26 | Centre |
| 'O'Quai' | Tours | 7 | 26 | Centre |
+---------------------+----------+------+------+----------------+
我认为它不应该,因为在第一个查询中,id_region和id_departement不为null,所以如果你执行“JOIN”或“LEFT OUTER JOIN”,结果应该是相同的。或者我错过了什么?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您遇到的问题与以下事实有关:当没有指定订单时,SQL不保证结果的顺序。如果添加ORDER BY子句,则应该得到相同的结果,前提是表中所有行都有匹配的键(当然)。