有没有办法,使用Mockito来模拟一个类中的某些方法,而不是其他方法?
例如,在这个(公认的设计)Stock类中我想模拟getPrice()和getQuantity()返回值(如下面的测试片段所示),但我希望getValue()以编码方式执行乘法在股票类
public class Stock {
private final double price;
private final int quantity;
Stock(double price, int quantity) {
this.price = price;
this.quantity = quantity;
}
public double getPrice() {
return price;
}
public int getQuantity() {
return quantity;
}
public double getValue() {
return getPrice() * getQuantity();
}
@Test
public void getValueTest() {
Stock stock = mock(Stock.class);
when(stock.getPrice()).thenReturn(100.00);
when(stock.getQuantity()).thenReturn(200);
double value = stock.getValue();
// Unfortunately the following assert fails, because the mock Stock getValue() method does not perform the Stock.getValue() calculation code.
assertEquals("Stock value not correct", 100.00*200, value, .00001);
}
答案 0 :(得分:488)
要直接回答你的问题,是的,你可以嘲笑某些方法而不会嘲笑别人。这称为部分模拟。有关详细信息,请参阅the Mockito documentation on partial mocks。
对于您的示例,您可以在测试中执行以下操作:
Stock stock = mock(Stock.class);
when(stock.getPrice()).thenReturn(100.00); // Mock implementation
when(stock.getQuantity()).thenReturn(200); // Mock implementation
when(stock.getValue()).thenCallRealMethod(); // Real implementation
在这种情况下,每个方法实现都被模拟,除非在thenCallRealMethod()
子句中指定when(..)
。
还有一种可能性与间谍相反,而不是模拟:
Stock stock = spy(Stock.class);
when(stock.getPrice()).thenReturn(100.00); // Mock implementation
when(stock.getQuantity()).thenReturn(200); // Mock implementation
// All other method call will use the real implementations
在这种情况下,除非您使用when(..)
定义了模拟行为,否则所有方法实现都是真实的。
在前一个例子中使用when(Object)
与间谍相比,有一个重要的陷阱。将调用真实方法(因为stock.getPrice()
在运行时when(..)
之前进行评估)。如果您的方法包含不应调用的逻辑,则可能会出现问题。您可以像这样编写上一个示例:
Stock stock = spy(Stock.class);
doReturn(100.00).when(stock).getPrice(); // Mock implementation
doReturn(200).when(stock).getQuantity(); // Mock implementation
// All other method call will use the real implementations
但是,在您的示例中,我认为它仍然会失败,因为getValue()
的实施依赖于quantity
和price
,而不是getQuantity()
和{{1这是你嘲笑过的。
你真正想要的只是:
getPrice()
答案 1 :(得分:124)
通过mockito中的间谍也支持对某个类进行部分模拟
List list = new LinkedList();
List spy = spy(list);
//optionally, you can stub out some methods:
when(spy.size()).thenReturn(100);
//using the spy calls real methods
spy.add("one");
spy.add("two");
//size() method was stubbed - 100 is printed
System.out.println(spy.size());
答案 2 :(得分:26)
根据docs:
Foo mock = mock(Foo.class, CALLS_REAL_METHODS);
// this calls the real implementation of Foo.getSomething()
value = mock.getSomething();
when(mock.getSomething()).thenReturn(fakeValue);
// now fakeValue is returned
value = mock.getSomething();
答案 3 :(得分:16)
根据问题,接受的答案是不正确的。
Stock stock = mock(Stock.class);
来电org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Class<T>)
的来电,如下所示:
public static <T> T mock(Class<T> classToMock) {
return mock(classToMock, withSettings().defaultAnswer(RETURNS_DEFAULTS));
}
值RETURNS_DEFAULTS
的文档告诉:
/**
* The default <code>Answer</code> of every mock <b>if</b> the mock was not stubbed.
* Typically it just returns some empty value.
* <p>
* {@link Answer} can be used to define the return values of unstubbed invocations.
* <p>
* This implementation first tries the global configuration.
* If there is no global configuration then it uses {@link ReturnsEmptyValues} (returns zeros, empty collections, nulls, etc.)
*/
根据文档,你想要的是org.mockito.Mockito.CALLS_REAL_METHODS
:
/**
* Optional <code>Answer</code> to be used with {@link Mockito#mock(Class, Answer)}
* <p>
* {@link Answer} can be used to define the return values of unstubbed invocations.
* <p>
* This implementation can be helpful when working with legacy code.
* When this implementation is used, unstubbed methods will delegate to the real implementation.
* This is a way to create a partial mock object that calls real methods by default.
* <p>
* As usual you are going to read <b>the partial mock warning</b>:
* Object oriented programming is more less tackling complexity by dividing the complexity into separate, specific, SRPy objects.
* How does partial mock fit into this paradigm? Well, it just doesn't...
* Partial mock usually means that the complexity has been moved to a different method on the same object.
* In most cases, this is not the way you want to design your application.
* <p>
* However, there are rare cases when partial mocks come handy:
* dealing with code you cannot change easily (3rd party interfaces, interim refactoring of legacy code etc.)
* However, I wouldn't use partial mocks for new, test-driven & well-designed code.
* <p>
* Example:
* <pre class="code"><code class="java">
* Foo mock = mock(Foo.class, CALLS_REAL_METHODS);
*
* // this calls the real implementation of Foo.getSomething()
* value = mock.getSomething();
*
* when(mock.getSomething()).thenReturn(fakeValue);
*
* // now fakeValue is returned
* value = mock.getSomething();
* </code></pre>
*/
因此,您的代码应如下所示:
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
public class StockTest {
public class Stock {
private final double price;
private final int quantity;
Stock(double price, int quantity) {
this.price = price;
this.quantity = quantity;
}
public double getPrice() {
return price;
}
public int getQuantity() {
return quantity;
}
public double getValue() {
return getPrice() * getQuantity();
}
}
@Test
public void getValueTest() {
Stock stock = mock(Stock.class, withSettings().defaultAnswer(CALLS_REAL_METHODS));
when(stock.getPrice()).thenReturn(100.00);
when(stock.getQuantity()).thenReturn(200);
double value = stock.getValue();
assertEquals("Stock value not correct", 100.00 * 200, value, .00001);
}
}
答案 4 :(得分:0)
使用Mockito的间谍方法进行部分嘲弄可以解决您的问题,如上面的答案所述。在某种程度上,我同意,对于您的具体用例,模拟数据库查找可能更合适。根据我的经验,这并不总是可行的 - 至少在没有其他解决方法的情况下 - 我会认为这是非常麻烦或至少是脆弱的。请注意,部分模拟不适用于Mockito的盟友版本。您至少使用了1.8.0。
我会为原始问题写一个简单的评论,而不是发布这个答案,但StackOverflow不允许这样做。
还有一件事:我真的无法理解,在这里被问到的问题多次被评论为“为什么你想这样做”而不至少试图理解这个问题。特别是当需要进行部分模拟时,我确实会想到很多用例。这就是Mockito的人提供这种功能的原因。这个功能当然不应该被滥用。但是当我们谈论测试用例设置时,否则无法以非常复杂的方式建立,应该使用间谍。