如何使用给定数量的流执行顺序异步Ajax请求

时间:2013-02-11 05:03:02

标签: javascript ajax

我需要使用有限的流来创建顺序异步ajax请求。截至目前,我被允许在Web服务器上只占用一个流,因此我只能在时间上执行一个ajax请求。

我有以下功能,当我被允许一次只使用一个流时,它可以帮助我。

function initiateChain() {
    var i = 0;
    var tasks = arguments;
    var callback = function () {
      i += 1;
      if (i != tasks.length) {
        tasks[i](callback); //block should call callback when done otherwise loop stops
      }
    }
    if (tasks.length != 0) {
      tasks[0](callback); //initiate first one
    }
  }

说我是否有三个ajax辅助函数

 function getGadgets(callback) {
         //ajax call
         callback(); // I call this in complete callback of $.ajax
 }

 function getBooks(callback) {
         //ajax call
         callback(); // I call this in complete callback of $.ajax
 }

 function getDeals(callback) {
         //ajax call
         callback(); // I call this in complete callback of $.ajax
 }

以下调用可确保从此客户端发出不超过1个ajax请求

initiateChain(getGadgets, getBooks, getDeals);

现在我需要增强initiateChain以支持任意数量的流。假设我可以使用2或n个数据流,我想知道这样做,而无需更改ajax辅助函数getGadgets,getDeals,getDeals。

简而言之,我有一组函数N,在这种情况下,getGadgets,getDeals和getDeals(| N | = 3)都需要连接到Web服务器。目前,我一次只能执行一个请求,因此initiateChain函数按顺序调用这三个方法。如果我有权访问M连接,我想执行| N |并行功能(最多M个)。

3 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:15)

如果您正在使用jQuery,那么您可以使用其.queue方法对您的ajax调用进行排队,然后按顺序执行它们。要运行多个序列,可以将初始出列包装在循环中。

function add_api_call_to_queue(qname, api_url) {
    $(document).queue(qname, function() {
        $.ajax({
            type     : 'GET',
            async    : true,
            url      : api_url,
            dataType : 'json',
            success  : function(data, textStatus, jqXHR) {
                // activate the next ajax call when this one finishes
                $(document).dequeue(qname);
            }
        });
    });
}

$(document).ready(function() {

    var queue_name       = 'a_queue';
    var concurrent_calls = 2;

    // add first AJAX call to queue
    add_api_call_to_queue(queue_name, '/example/api/books');

    // add second AJAX call to queue
    add_api_call_to_queue(queue_name, '/example/api/dvds');

    // add third AJAX call to queue
    add_api_call_to_queue(queue_name, '/example/api/shoes');

    // start the AJAX queue
    for (i=0;i<concurrent_calls;i++) {
        $(document).dequeue(queue_name);
    }

})

答案 1 :(得分:1)

只要您的回调都是同步的,这应该适合您,如果没有让您走上正确的轨道

var initiateChain = function () {

    var args = arguments,
        index = 0,
        length = args.length,
        process = function ( index ) {

            if ( index < length ) {
                $.ajax({
                    url: '/example.php',
                    complete: function () {
                        // Callbacks get run here
                        args[ index ];
                        process( ++index );
                    }

                });
            }


        };

    if ( length ) {
        process( 0 );
    }

};

initiateChain( getGadgets, getDeals, getDeals );

答案 2 :(得分:0)

谢谢@James,我从你编辑的长度中得到了线索。因此,调用是异步ajax请求。因此,我们的想法是创建M个异步调用 upfront 。然后,当每一个完成时,他们将继续那么多。

我确实尝试过nodejs,然后关注initiateChain按预期工作

var calls = [];

function initiateChain() {
    var i = 0;
    var maxSteams = 2;
    var tasks = arguments;
    var callback = function () {
      i += 1;
      if (i < tasks.length) {
        tasks[i](callback); //block should call callback when done otherwise loop stops
      }
    }
    if (tasks.length) {
      i = ((tasks.length > maxSteams) ? maxSteams : tasks.length) - 1;
      for (var j = 0; j < maxSteams; j+=1) {
        if (j < tasks.length) {
          tasks[j](callback); //initiate first set
        } else {
          break;
        }
      }
    }
}

//test methods
for(var k = 0; k < 8; k+=1 ) {
  calls[k] = (function (message, index) {
    return function (callback) {
      var ts = new Date().getTime();
      console.log(message + " started - " + ts);
      setTimeout(function() {
        ts = new Date().getTime();
        console.log(message + " completed - " + ts);
        callback();
      }, index * 1000);
    };
  })("call" + (k+1), (k+1))
}

initiateChain(calls[0], calls[1], calls[2], calls[3], 
    calls[4], calls[5], calls[6], calls[7]);

在我的实验中,我得到了以下结果

call1 started - 1360580377905
call2 started - 1360580377926

call1 completed - 1360580378937
call3 started - 1360580378937

call2 completed - 1360580379937
call4 started - 1360580379937

call3 completed - 1360580381945
call5 started - 1360580381945

call4 completed - 1360580383946
call6 started - 1360580383946

call5 completed - 1360580386959
call7 started - 1360580386959

call6 completed - 1360580389950
call8 started - 1360580389950

call7 completed - 1360580393972

call8 completed - 1360580397959