我不清楚以下情况。
首先,这段代码编译得很好:
#include <vector>
typedef struct{
int x1,x2,x3,x4;
} ints;
typedef std::vector<ints> vec;
int main(){
vec v;
ints a = {0,1,2,3};
v.push_back(a);
}
以下代码几乎相同:
#include <vector>
typedef std::vector<int[4]> vec;
int main(){
vec v;
int a[4] = {0,1,2,3};
v.push_back(a);
}
但它会抛出我将在最后包含的极长的错误输出。为什么编译器对这两个程序的处理方式如此不同?这绝对不直观。
以下是我的系统上使用g ++编译时抛出的编译器错误:
[mattg@pigott Test]$ g++ test2.cpp -o test2
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/i586-redhat-linux/bits/c++allocator.h:34,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/allocator.h:48,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/vector:62,
from test2.cpp:2:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/ext/new_allocator.h: In member function ‘void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::construct(_Tp*, const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4]]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/stl_vector.h:737: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’
test2.cpp:9: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/ext/new_allocator.h:105: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/vector:69,
from test2.cpp:2:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/vector.tcc: In member function ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> >, const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/stl_vector.h:741: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’
test2.cpp:9: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/vector.tcc:306: error: array must be initialized with a brace-enclosed initializer
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/stl_vector.h:741: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’
test2.cpp:9: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/vector.tcc:312: error: invalid array assignment
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/i586-redhat-linux/bits/c++allocator.h:34,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/allocator.h:48,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/vector:62,
from test2.cpp:2:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/ext/new_allocator.h: In member function ‘void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::destroy(_Tp*) [with _Tp = int [4]]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/vector.tcc:353: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> >, const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/stl_vector.h:741: instantiated from ‘void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const _Tp&) [with _Tp = int [4], _Alloc = std::allocator<int [4]>]’
test2.cpp:9: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/ext/new_allocator.h:115: error: request for member ‘~int [4]’ in ‘* __p’, which is of non-class type ‘int [4]’
答案 0 :(得分:11)
错误:ISO C ++禁止初始化 在数组中新的错误:数组必须是 用括号括起来初始化 初始化程序
错误:数组无效 分配
错误:请求 '* __p'中的成员'~int [4]',即 非类型'int [4]'
要了解其中一个错误,请想象以下内容:
void main() {
int a[4] = {0,1,2,3};
int b[4] = a;
}
相反:
typedef struct{
int x1,x2,x3,x4;
} ints;
int main()
{
ints a;
ints b = a;
}
甚至:
typedef struct{
int x[4];
} ints;
int main()
{
ints a;
ints b = a;
}
无法通过赋值运算符复制C / C ++数组,但包含数组的struct
可以是。
所以很容易解决:
typedef struct{
int x[4];
} ints;
typedef std::vector<ints> vec;
int main(){
vec v;
ints a = { {0,1,2,3} };
v.push_back(a);
}
答案 1 :(得分:6)
在幕后,它正在进行一项任务,而且没有为数组定义。
错误的相关部分是
从这里实例化/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits/vector.tcc:306 :错误:必须使用大括号括起初始化程序初始化数组 /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include /c++/4.4.1/bits/stl_vector.h:741:从'void std :: vector&lt; _Tp,_Alloc&gt; :: push_back(const _Tp&amp;)实例化[with _Tp = int [4],_ Alloc = std ::分配器]'test2.cpp:9:从这里实例化/usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../../include/c++/4.4.1/bits /vector.tcc:312:错误:数组分配无效
答案 2 :(得分:6)
尝试boost::array而不是普通数组。它提供了固定大小数组周围的STL兼容接口,因此可以在STL容器中使用。另外,它实现了边界检查(boost::array::at
)。
#include <boost/array.hpp>
#include <vector>
typedef std::vector< boost::array<int, 4> > vec;
int main(){
vec v;
boost::array<int, 4> va = {0,1,2,3};
v.push_back(va);
}
答案 3 :(得分:2)
自从我使用C ++以来已经有一段时间了,但我相信你遇到的核心问题是数组没有必要的语义来与std::vector<>
相处得很好。我没有方便的Stroustrup副本,或者我会给你一个参考。
答案 4 :(得分:2)
请尝试使用vector
代替vector
。
答案 5 :(得分:1)
对于所有STL容器(包括T
),值类型std::vector<T>
的要求是T
是Assignable
- ISO C ++ 03 23.1 [lib.container。要求] / 4-5。 Assignable
定义如下:
表达式
t = u
,其中t
的类型为T
,u
的类型为 cvT
,有效,其返回类型为T&
,后置条件是t
等同于u
。
数组不符合此要求,因为您无法写:
int a[2], b[2];
a = b;
你不能这样做的原因是因为上面代码片段中的a
和b
根据4.2中描述的数组到指针衰减的常用C ++规则衰减到指针式rvalues [ conv.array。当然,如果不允许在非重载operator=
的左侧允许rvalue。
答案 6 :(得分:-1)
数组在C ++中不是第一类;例如,你不能将它们作为参数传递给它们(它们会衰减到指针,尽管你可以将指针和引用传递给数组)。此外,它们没有价值语义。