考虑下面的代码(尽管有点人为,但它是对现实世界程序的一个重大简化):
string[] strings = { "ab", "abcd", "abc", "ac", "b", "abcde", "c", "bc" };
string[] filters = { "a", "b", "c" };
// iteratively apply each filter
IEnumerable<string> filteredStrings = strings.ToArray();
foreach (string filter in filters)
{
// in my real-world program lots of processing and stuff
// happens here, hence why i need the enclosing foreach loop
filteredStrings = filteredStrings.Where(s => s.Contains(filter));
}
如您所见,代码迭代地将字符串数组过滤到较小的字符串集。当for-each循环结束时,filteredStrings
应该是通过所有过滤器的字符串的子集。在这个例子中,那将是:
{ "abcd", "abc", "abcde" }
然而,我得到的输出是:
{ "abcd", "abc", "ac", "abcde", "c", "bc" }
似乎只是过滤掉那些不包含"c"
的字符串,我认为它与最后一个过滤器有关。我想我一定不能以正确的方式链接IEnumerable.Where()
。这里发生了什么,我怎样才能得到正确的输出?
是的,根据我的代码中的注释,foreach循环需要保持不变。
答案 0 :(得分:9)
where委托不以您期望的方式捕获局部变量。变量filter
正在发生变化,它正在使用所有轮次中的最后一个结果,因为Linq进行了懒惰的评估。
将迭代变量复制到本地var,我相信它会捕获您期望的方式。
foreach (string filter in filters)
{
string localFilter = filter;
filteredStrings = filteredStrings.Where(s => s.Contains(localFilter));
}
答案 1 :(得分:3)
您正在使用在循环中修改的变量:filter
创建它的副本:
foreach (string filter in filters)
{
// in my real-world program lots of processing and stuff
// happens here, hence why i need the enclosing foreach loop
string f = filter;
filteredStrings = filteredStrings.Where(s => s.Contains(f));
}