这是存储过程中UNION ALL
的正确方法吗?
ALTER PROCEDURE [GetHomePageObjectPageWise]
@PageIndex INT = 1
,@PageSize INT = 10
,@PageCount INT OUTPUT
,@whereStoryID varchar(2000)
,@whereAlbumID varchar(2000)
,@wherePictureID varchar(2000)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT StoryID
, AlbumID
, StoryTitle
, NULL AS AlbumName
, (SELECT URL FROM AlbumPictures WHERE (AlbumID = dbo.Stories.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')) AS AlbumCover
, Votes
, NULL AS PictureId
, 'stories' AS tableName
, NEWID() AS Sort
INTO #Results1
FROM Stories WHERE StoryID IN (SELECT StringVal FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereStoryID))
SELECT NULL AS StoryID
, AlbumID
, NULL AS StoryTitle
, AlbumName
, (SELECT URL FROM AlbumPictures AS AlbumPictures_3 WHERE (AlbumID = Albums.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')) AS AlbumCover
, Votes
, NULL AS PictureId
, 'albums' AS tableName
, NEWID() AS Sort
INTO #Results2
FROM Albums WHERE AlbumID IN (SELECT StringVal FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereAlbumID))
SELECT NULL AS StoryID
, NULL AS AlbumID
, NULL AS StoryTitle
, NULL AS AlbumName
, URL
, Votes
, PictureID
, 'pictures' AS tableName
, NEWID() AS Sort
INTO #Results3
FROM AlbumPictures AS AlbumPictures_1
WHERE PictureID IN (SELECT StringVal FROM funcListToTableInt(@wherePictureID))
SELECT * INTO #Results4 FROM #Results1
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM #Results2
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM #Results3
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(
ORDER BY [Sort] DESC
)AS RowNumber
, * INTO #Results
FROM #Results4
DECLARE @RecordCount INT
SELECT @RecordCount = COUNT(*) FROM #Results
SET @PageCount = CEILING(CAST(@RecordCount AS DECIMAL(10, 2)) / CAST(@PageSize AS DECIMAL(10, 2)))
SELECT * FROM #Results
WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN(@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1 AND(((@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1) + @PageSize) - 1
DROP TABLE #Results
DROP TABLE #Results1
DROP TABLE #Results2
DROP TABLE #Results3
DROP TABLE #Results4
END
答案 0 :(得分:3)
以下是一些评论:
(1)我更喜欢表值变量(declare @Results as table . . .
)而不是临时表。
(2)通常,编写单个查询而不是单独的查询可能更好。因此,您无论如何都可以消除中间结果表。 SQL引擎旨在优化执行路径。给他们一个工作的机会。也就是说,有时他们会出错,中间表是可取的/必要的。
(3)你的排序还可以,但你确实需要小心。如果Sort具有重复值,则存在获取重复值的风险,并且不同的迭代将导致问题。
(4)由于您实际上只是从查询返回结果,为什么不直接定义查询(可能作为视图)并完全消除存储过程?存储过程使SQL Server不太可能将结果缓存以进行分页。
(5)我也想知道你是否可以删除from
子句中的函数调用,因为这些也会对性能产生负面影响。
答案 1 :(得分:3)
这些天我喜欢使用非物化的CTE
而不是临时表 - 尽管在某些情况下(比如说数据需要索引)我会使用临时表。
主要是大量的化妆品我真的改变了所有的方式,希望将来更具可读性(这没有经过测试,因为我没有你的数据副本) < / p>
ALTER PROCEDURE [GetHomePageObjectPageWise]
@PageIndex INT = 1
,@PageSize INT = 10
,@PageCount INT OUTPUT
,@whereStoryID VARCHAR(2000)
,@whereAlbumID VARCHAR(2000)
,@wherePictureID VARCHAR(2000)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
WITH Results1 AS
(
SELECT
StoryID,
AlbumID,
StoryTitle,
[AlbumName] = NULL,
[AlbumCover] =
(
SELECT URL
FROM AlbumPictures
WHERE (AlbumID = dbo.Stories.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')
),
Votes,
[PictureId] = NULL,
[tableName] = 'stories',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM Stories
WHERE
StoryID IN
(
SELECT StringVal
FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereStoryID)
)
)
, Results2 AS
(
SELECT
[StoryID] = NULL ,
AlbumID,
[StoryTitle] NULL,
AlbumName,
[AlbumCover] =
(
SELECT URL
FROM AlbumPictures AS AlbumPictures_3 --<<<DO YOU NEED THIS ALIAS?
WHERE (AlbumID = Albums.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')
),
Votes,
[PictureId] = NULL,
[tableName] = 'albums',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM Albums
WHERE
AlbumID IN
(
SELECT StringVal
FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereAlbumID)
)
)
, Result3 AS
(
SELECT
[StoryID] = NULL,
[AlbumID] = NULL,
[StoryTitle] = NULL,
[AlbumName] = NULL,
URL,
Votes,
PictureID,
[tableName] = 'pictures',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM AlbumPictures --AS AlbumPictures_1 <<<DO YOU NEED THIS ALIAS?
WHERE
PictureID IN
(
SELECT StringVal
FROM funcListToTableInt(@wherePictureID)
)
)
, Result4 AS
(
SELECT * FROM Results1 UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM Results2 UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM Results3
)
, Results AS
(
SELECT
[RowNumber] = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Sort] DESC),
x.*
FROM Results4 x
)
SELECT *
FROM Results
WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN(@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1 AND(((@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1) + @PageSize) - 1;
DECLARE @RecordCount INT = @@RowCount;
SET @PageCount = CEILING(CAST(@RecordCount AS DECIMAL(10, 2)) / CAST(@PageSize AS DECIMAL(10, 2)));
END
我通常使用Aaron Bertrand撰写存储过程的建议这篇博文是我的核对表和我用来尝试统一我用于所有Sprocs的样式的模板:
https://sqlblog.org/2008/10/30/my-stored-procedure-best-practices-checklist
我认为正如Gordon建议你可以从存储过程中移出大量逻辑并创建一个VIEW
这样:
CREATE VIEW [console].[vw_mySimpleView]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
WITH Results1 AS
(
SELECT
StoryID,
AlbumID,
StoryTitle,
[AlbumName] = NULL,
[AlbumCover] =
(
SELECT URL
FROM AlbumPictures
WHERE (AlbumID = dbo.Stories.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')
),
Votes,
[PictureId] = NULL,
[tableName] = 'stories',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM Stories
)
, Results2 AS
(
SELECT
[StoryID] = NULL ,
AlbumID,
[StoryTitle] NULL,
AlbumName,
[AlbumCover] =
(
SELECT URL
FROM AlbumPictures
WHERE (AlbumID = Albums.AlbumID) AND (AlbumCover = 'True')
),
Votes,
[PictureId] = NULL,
[tableName] = 'albums',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM Albums
)
, Result3 AS
(
SELECT
[StoryID] = NULL,
[AlbumID] = NULL,
[StoryTitle] = NULL,
[AlbumName] = NULL,
URL,
Votes,
PictureID,
[tableName] = 'pictures',
[Sort] = NEWID()
FROM AlbumPictures
)
, Result4 AS
(
SELECT * FROM Results1 UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM Results2 UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM Results3
)
SELECT *
FROM Results4;
GO
然后Sproc会短得多:
ALTER PROCEDURE [GetHomePageObjectPageWise]
@PageIndex INT = 1
,@PageSize INT = 10
,@PageCount INT OUTPUT
,@whereStoryID VARCHAR(2000)
,@whereAlbumID VARCHAR(2000)
,@wherePictureID VARCHAR(2000)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT
[RowNumber] = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Sort] DESC),
x.*
FROM
(
SELECT *
FROM [dbo].[vw_mySimpleView]
WHERE
StoryID IN
(
SELECT StringVal
FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereStoryID)
)
OR
AlbumID IN
(
SELECT StringVal
FROM funcListToTableInt(@whereAlbumID)
)
) x
)
WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN(@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1 AND(((@PageIndex -1) * @PageSize + 1) + @PageSize) - 1;
DECLARE @RecordCount INT = @@RowCount;
SET @PageCount = CEILING(CAST(@RecordCount AS DECIMAL(10, 2)) / CAST(@PageSize AS DECIMAL(10, 2)));
END