遍历状态monad时如何处理嵌套结构

时间:2012-12-17 19:55:47

标签: scala stack-overflow scalaz state-monad

我有一个嵌套结构,我正在使用scalaz状态monad转换为XML。这很有效,直到我必须处理多级嵌套结构。这是一个类似于我正在做的简化示例。鉴于以下ADT:

sealed trait Nested
case object Leaf extends Nested
case class Foo(inner: Nested) extends Nested
case class Bar(inner: Nested) extends Nested

我使用状态monad编写转换器对象(假设Scalaz7和以下导入import scalaz.{Node => _, _}; import Scalaz._; import scala.xml._):

case class Parents(foos: Int, bars: Int)
type ParentsS[X] = State[Parents, X]

def convertFoo(foo: Foo): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = for {
  parents <- init[Parents]
  _ <- put[Parents](Parents(parents.foos + 1, parents.bars))
  inner <- convert(foo.inner)
  _ <- put[Parents](parents)
} yield <foo count={ parents.foos.toString }/>.copy(child=inner)

def convertBar(bar: Bar): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = for {
  parents <- init[Parents]
  _ <- put[Parents](Parents(parents.foos, parents.bars + 1))
  inner <- convert(bar.inner)
  _ <- put[Parents](parents)
} yield <bar count={ parents.bars.toString }/>.copy(child=inner)

def convert(nested: Nested): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = nested match {
  case Leaf => Seq[Node]().point[ParentsS]
  case foo@Foo(_) => convertFoo(foo)
  case bar@Bar(_) => convertBar(bar)
}

def nested(n: Int): Nested =
  if (n == 0) Leaf
  else {
    if (n % 2 == 0) Bar(nested(n - 1))
    else Foo(nested(n - 1))
  }

根据我的堆栈设置,convert(nested(1000)).apply(Parents(0, 0))将导致转换过程中的堆栈溢出。 (较高的值会导致nested溢出,但这可以忽略,因为我刚刚为此问题创建了nested。):

    at scalaz.IdInstances$$anon$1.bind(Id.scala:20)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(StateT.scala:48)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anon$7.apply(StateT.scala:72)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(StateT.scala:48)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anon$7.apply(StateT.scala:72)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anonfun$flatMap$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(StateT.scala:49)
    at scalaz.StateT$$anonfun$flatMap$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(StateT.scala:48)

我的问题是 - 在scalaz.stateT中避免堆栈溢出的最佳方法是什么?如果让XML序列化逻辑更容易理解和排除故障,我想继续使用状态monad(实际输入结构是从实时调试会话中检索到的JDI镜像objects and arrays,内部值是嵌套字段值)。

编辑:取出嵌套堆栈问题:

import util.control.TailCalls
def nested2(n: Int, acc: Nested = Leaf): TailCalls.TailRec[Nested] =
  if (n == 0) TailCalls.done(acc)
  else TailCalls.tailcall(nested2(n - 1, if (n % 2 == 0) Bar(acc) else Foo(acc)))

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:4)

Trampolining可以帮助您避免堆栈溢出。首先进行相同的设置:

sealed trait Nested
case object Leaf extends Nested
case class Foo(inner: Nested) extends Nested
case class Bar(inner: Nested) extends Nested

import scalaz.{Node => _, _}; import Scalaz._;
import scala.util.control.TailCalls, scala.xml._

case class Parents(foos: Int, bars: Int)

def nested(n: Int, acc: Nested = Leaf): TailCalls.TailRec[Nested] =
  if (n == 0) TailCalls.done(acc) else TailCalls.tailcall(
    nested(n - 1, if (n % 2 == 0) Bar(acc) else Foo(acc))
  )

一些略有不同的类型别名:

type TrampolinedState[S, A] = StateT[Free.Trampoline, S, A]
type ParentsS[A] = TrampolinedState[Parents, A]

为方便起见,我们将导入MonadState实例的方法:

val monadState = MonadState[TrampolinedState, Parents]
import monadState._

其余部分实际上更简洁,因为我们不需要put等上的类型参数:

def convertFoo(foo: Foo): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = for {
  parents <- init
  _ <- put(Parents(parents.foos + 1, parents.bars))
  inner <- convert(foo.inner)
  _ <- put(parents)
} yield <foo count={ parents.foos.toString }/>.copy(child=inner)

def convertBar(bar: Bar): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = for {
  parents <- init
  _ <- put(Parents(parents.foos, parents.bars + 1))
  inner <- convert(bar.inner)
  _ <- put(parents)
} yield <bar count={ parents.bars.toString }/>.copy(child=inner)

def convert(nested: Nested): ParentsS[Seq[Node]] = nested match {
  case Leaf => Seq[Node]().point[ParentsS]
  case foo@Foo(_) => convertFoo(foo)
  case bar@Bar(_) => convertBar(bar)
}

现在我们只运行以下命令(例如):

convert(nested(2000).result).apply(Parents(0, 0)).run

这远远超过了香草State解决方案在我的机器上开始窒息的程度。

相关问题