为最终变量赋值

时间:2012-12-12 17:20:55

标签: java callback final

假设我有这段代码:

public HttpResponse myFunction(...) {
    final HttpResponse resp;
    OnResponseCallback myCallback = new OnResponseCallback() {
        public void onResponseReceived(HttpResponse response) {
            resp = response;
        }
    };
    // launch operation, result will be returned to myCallback.onResponseReceived()
    // wait on a CountDownLatch until operation is finished
    return resp;
}

显然我无法从onResponseReceived为resp赋值,因为它是最终变量,但如果它不是最终变量onResponseReceived则看不到它。 那么,如何从onResponseReceived?

为resp赋值

我想要创建一个用于封装resp对象的包装类。最后一个对象将是这个包装类的一个实例,我可以将值赋给resp处理最终类中的对象(这不是最终的)。

代码就是这个:

class ResponseWrapper {
    HttpResponse resp = null;
}

public HttpResponse myFunction(...) {
    final ResponseWrapper respWrap = new ResponseWrapper();
    OnResponseCallback myCallback = new OnResponseCallback() {
        public void onResponseReceived(HttpResponse response) {
            respWrap.resp = response;
        }
    };
    // launch operation, result will be returned to myCallback.onResponseReceived()
    // wait on a CountDownLatch until operation is finished
    return respWrap.resp;
}

您对此解决方案有何看法?

5 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:7)

java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference

标准做法是使用最终的AtomicReference,您可以设置和获取。这也增加了线程安全的好处:)正如您所提到的,CountDownLatch有助于等待完成。

答案 1 :(得分:4)

您的解决方案与其他解决方案一样有效。其他流行的选择包括单元素数组

final HttpResponse[] resp = new Response[1];
// In the callback
resp[0] = response;
// After the operation
return resp[0];

和通用包装

public class Ref<T> {
  public T value;
}

final Ref<HttpResponse> resp;
// In the callback
resp.value = response;
// After the operation
return resp.value;

答案 2 :(得分:1)

您可以使用SynchronousQueue将备忘和等待合并为一个(省略异常处理)

public HttpResponse myFunction(...) {
    final Queue<HttpResponse> resp = new SynchronousQueue<HttpResponse>();
    OnResponseCallback myCallback = new OnResponseCallback() {
        public void onResponseReceived(HttpResponse response) {
            resp.put(response);
        }
    };
    return resp.take();
}

答案 3 :(得分:0)

我要做的改变是使用AtomicReference,因为这显然是多线程的,你不必编写自己的包装器。否则,对我来说似乎很合理。

答案 4 :(得分:0)

你可以使它变为可变和最终;)最简单的方法是使用na数组,但也可以使用AtomicReference。

public HttpResponse myFunction(...) {
    final HttpResponse[] resp = { null };
    OnResponseCallback myCallback = new OnResponseCallback() {
        public void onResponseReceived(HttpResponse response) {
            resp[0] = response;
        }
    };
    // launch operation, result will be returned to myCallback.onResponseReceived()
    // wait on a CountDownLatch as soon as operation is finished
    return resp[0];
}

public HttpResponse myFunction(...) {
    final AtomicReference<HttpResponse> resp = new AtomicReference<HttpResponse>();
    OnResponseCallback myCallback = new OnResponseCallback() {
        public void onResponseReceived(HttpResponse response) {
            resp.set(response);
        }
    };
    // launch operation, result will be returned to myCallback.onResponseReceived()
    // wait on a CountDownLatch as soon as operation is finished
    return resp.get();
}