我有一种情况,我希望总结两个表之间的差异。问题是第二个表中可以存在一行,然后我想将其作为新行插入。
伪
SELECT T1.seller, T1.code, T1.amount - T2.amount
查看图片以获得解释
答案 0 :(得分:2)
DECLARE @T1 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
DECLARE @T2 TABLE(
seller VARCHAR(10),
code VARCHAR(3) NULL,
amount MONEY
)
INSERT INTO @T1 VALUES
('VL',NULL,1),
('VL','317',70005.6)
INSERT INTO @T2 VALUES
('VL',NULL,0.5),
('VL','500',4450)
SELECT seller,code,SUM(amount) [amount] FROM
(
SELECT * FROM @T1
UNION ALL
SELECT seller,code,-amount as amount FROM @T2
) T
GROUP BY seller,code
答案 1 :(得分:1)
你需要做一个完整的外部联接 - 然后加以总结。如果你只运行内部查询,你将获得每个可能的行组合(在t1中是独占的,在t1和t2中都存在,在t2中是exlclusive) - 然后你将它组合起来并做总和。
SELECT Seller ,
Code ,
SUM(Tab1_amt - Tab2_amt) AS Amount
FROM ( SELECT COALESCE(tab1.Seller, tab2.Seller) AS Seller ,
COALESCE(tab1.code, tab2.code) AS Code ,
COALESCE(tab1.amount, 0) AS tab1_amt ,
COALESCE(tab2.amount, 0) AS tab2_amt
FROM tab1
FULL OUTER JOIN tab2 ON tab1.seller = tab2.seller
AND tab1.code = tab2.code
) AS Tbl
GROUP BY Seller ,
Code
答案 2 :(得分:1)
我认为您需要FULL JOIN
(除非您确实希望将行插入第一个表格)
SELECT COALESCE(t1.Seller, t2.Seller) AS Seller,
COALESCE(t1.Code, t2.Code) AS Code,
COALESCE(t1.Amount, 0) - COALESCE(t2.Amount, 0) AS Amount
FROM Table1 t1
FULL JOIN Table2 t2
ON t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0);
如果确实需要插入表1的行,则需要执行2次操作,首先插入,然后选择:
INSERT Table1 (Seller, Code, Amount)
SELECT t2.Seller, t2.Code, 0 AS Amount
FROM Table2 t2
WHERE NOT EXISTS
( SELECT 1
FROM Table1 t1
WHERE t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0)
);
SELECT t1.Seller,
t1.Code,
t1.Amount - COALESCE(t2.Amount, 0) AS Amount
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN Table2 t2
ON t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0);
修改强>
如果每个表中的行都不是unqiue而你需要对它们求和,那么你需要在子查询中进行求和,因为JOIN将引入交叉连接:
考虑这个数据
Table1
Seller Code Amount
VL 500 10
VL 500 20
Table2
Seller Code Amount
VL 500 30
VL 500 5
当你加入这个时,你会得到:
t1.Seller t1.Code t1.Amount t2.Seller t2.Code t2.Amount
VL 500 10 VL 500 30
VL 500 10 VL 500 5
VL 500 20 VL 500 30
VL 500 20 VL 500 5
差值的总和是-10而不是-5。
SELECT COALESCE(t1.Seller, t2.Seller) AS Seller,
COALESCE(t1.Code, t2.Code) AS Code,
COALESCE(t1.Amount, 0) - COALESCE(t2.Amount, 0) AS Amount
FROM ( SELECT Seller, Code, SUM(Amount) AS Amount
FROM Table1
GROUP BY Seller, Code
) t1
FULL JOIN
( SELECT Seller, Code, SUM(Amount) AS Amount
FROM Table2
GROUP BY Seller, Code
) t2
ON t1.Seller = t2.Seller
AND COALESCE(t1.Code, 0) = COALESCE(t2.Code, 0);
编辑2
Daniel's answer中的UNION
方法的效果会比完全加入好得多:
SELECT Seller, Code, Amount = SUM(Amount)
FROM ( SELECT Seller, Code, Amount
FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT Seller, Code, -Amount
FROM Table2
) t
GROUP BY Seller, Code
答案 3 :(得分:1)
这样的东西?你不知道要插入“因此tableX”中的表格
insert into tableX (seller,code,amount) values (T1.seller, T1.code, T1.amount -T2.amount)
select count(*) from table2 having count(*) < 1
请注意,在插入应用过滤器后,将过滤器设置为select语句 你没有指定你需要什么类型的SQL,所以我不能说这是否有效