我正在编写一个时间非常重要的程序,我刚刚通过大量的调试打印实现了我的大保持(80%的计算时间)将非常大的BigInteger(50K位)转换为字符串。 /> 这种行为是预期的,或者我如何改变某些东西以使其运行得更快?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
即使您使用long
和double
,将数字转换为字符串也是一项昂贵的操作。
通常,唯一更昂贵的是在为文件或控制台编写文本时执行的IO。
值得注意的是,内置转换器的文本编号是O(N ^ 2)操作,其中N是数字位数。因此,50K数字数字转换为十进制字符串需要很长时间就不足为奇了。
根据tmyklebu的建议,我写了这个。对于少于500位的数字,速度较慢,但在50,000位数的范围内速度要快得多。
public static void main(String... args) {
BigInteger bi = BigInteger.valueOf(11).pow(48100);
System.out.println(bi.toString());
System.out.println(toString(bi));
System.out.println("bi.length=" + bi.toString().length() + ", toString(bi).length=" + toString(bi).length());
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
long start = System.nanoTime();
String s = bi.toString();
long mid = System.nanoTime();
String s2 = toString(bi);
long end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.printf("time1 %.3f ms, time2 %.3f ms%n", (mid - start) / 1e6, (end - mid) / 1e6);
if (!s.equals(s2))
throw new AssertionError();
}
}
public static String toString(BigInteger bi) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
int i = 16;
while (bi.compareTo(powerOfTen(i)) > 0)
i *= 2;
toString(bi, sb, i);
int start = 0;
while (sb.charAt(start) == '0')
start++;
return sb.substring(start);
}
private static void toString(BigInteger bi, StringBuilder sb, int digits) {
if (digits < 18) {
int start = sb.length();
for (int i = 0; i < digits; i++)
sb.append('0');
long l = bi.longValue();
for (int i = digits - 1; i >= 0; i--, l /= 10)
sb.setCharAt(start + i, (char) ('0' + l % 10));
} else {
int digits2 = digits / 2;
BigInteger[] parts = bi.divideAndRemainder(powerOfTen(digits2));
toString(parts[0], sb, digits - digits2);
toString(parts[1], sb, digits2);
}
}
private static final Map<Integer, BigInteger> powersOfTen = new HashMap<Integer, BigInteger>();
private static BigInteger powerOfTen(int digits2) {
BigInteger tens = powersOfTen.get(digits2);
if (tens == null)
powersOfTen.put(digits2, tens = BigInteger.TEN.pow(digits2));
return tens;
}
打印
973096948397248203274473625697464617461138859359846077811290536......
973096948397248203274473625697464617461138859359846077811290536......
bi.length=50091, toString(bi).length=50091
time1 525.892 ms, time2 67.260 ms
time1 458.559 ms, time2 98.178 ms
time1 441.275 ms, time2 92.902 ms
time1 399.339 ms, time2 98.448 ms
time1 518.761 ms, time2 97.804 ms
time1 396.884 ms, time2 65.651 ms
time1 363.945 ms, time2 98.827 ms
答案 1 :(得分:1)
查看有关Performance of BigInteger.toString(radix)的帖子。它可以给你一个想法。