我有一个使用envisage框架的客户端 - 服务器应用程序,我使用线程来处理连接,这里是来自代码的令牌
....
SocketServer.TCPServer.allow_reuse_address = True
self.server = TCPFactory( ( HOST, PORT ), TCPRequestHandler, self.application)
self.server_thread = threading.Thread( target = self.server.serve_forever )
self.server_thread.setDaemon( True )
self.server_thread.start()
class TCPFactory( SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer ):
def __init__( self, server_address, RequestHandlerClass, application ):
SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer.__init__( self, server_address, RequestHandlerClass )
self.application = application
class TCPRequestHandler( SocketServer.BaseRequestHandler ):
""""""
def setup( self ):
.....
在envisage框架中,我调用了open_file( )
函数,它给了我们一个弹出窗口,但是当这个窗口出现时,我收到的是以下错误
Exception in thread Thread-2:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 551, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 504, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 225, in serve_forever
r, w, e = select.select([self], [], [], poll_interval)
error: (4, 'Interrupted system call')
如何处理此错误?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
在Armin Rigo评论之后,我修改了SockeServer.py
def serve_forever(self, poll_interval=0.5):
"""Handle one request at a time until shutdown.
Polls for shutdown every poll_interval seconds. Ignores
self.timeout. If you need to do periodic tasks, do them in
another thread.
"""
self.__is_shut_down.clear()
try:
while not self.__shutdown_request:
# XXX: Consider using another file descriptor or
# connecting to the socket to wake this up instead of
# polling. Polling reduces our responsiveness to a
# shutdown request and wastes cpu at all other times.
try:
r, w, e = select.select([self], [], [], poll_interval)
except select.error as ex:
#print ex
if ex[0] == 4:
continue
else:
raise
if self in r:
self._handle_request_noblock()
finally:
self.__shutdown_request = False
self.__is_shut_down.set()
答案 1 :(得分:0)
当我向程序添加一个小httpd服务器时,我遇到了类似的问题,它接收来自其他进程的各种信号。在玩完之后我想出了一个简单的解决方案,避免实际修改stlib代码,但我认为它有点冒险。我只是将一个serve_forever调用包装在一个捕获并忽略套接字错误的循环中:
def non_int_serve_forever(self, poll_interval=0.5):
while 1:
try:
self.serve_forever(poll_interval=poll_interval)
break
except select.error:
pass
这消除了为不同版本的SocketServer.py需要不同解决方案的风险,但是即使它现在可以正常工作,但很多时候,serve_forever()应该可以多次重启,这并不明显。
有什么想法吗?