目前我有一个看起来像这样的控制器:
public class MyController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Action1 (int id1, int id2)
{
}
public ActionResult Action2 (int id3, int id4)
{
}
}
正如你所看到的,我的控制器都有相同的参数“pattern”,两个不可为空的有符号整数。
我的路线配置如下:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Action2",
url: "My/Action2/{id3}-{id4}",
defaults: new { controller = "My", action = "Action2", id3 = 0, id4 = 0 }
);
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Action1",
url: "My/Action1/{id1}-{id2}",
defaults: new { controller = "My", action = "Action1", id1 = 0, id2 = 0 }
);
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Default",
url: "{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }
);
然而,我有更多的控制器动作而不仅仅是这两个,所以基本上我已经为每一个映射了一个单独的路线,这让我觉得非常混乱。
我想知道的是我是否可以使用两个参数而不是一个参数来执行默认路由,例如:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Default2",
url: "{controller}/{action}/{id1}-{id2}",
defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id1 = 0, id2 = 0 }
);
但是,鉴于我的参数并不总是命名为id1
和id2
,这将不起作用(错误是“参数字典包含参数的空条目”。有没有办法可以这样做?(或者是一种更好的完全不同的方式?)
感谢您的帮助!
编辑:根据目前的答案,我的问题似乎有点误导。我想要一个具有通用参数的路由,因此不依赖于特定的参数名称。我希望能告诉路由管理员“嘿,如果你收到带有模式{controller}/{action}/{parameter}-{parameter}
的请求,我希望你将这两个参数传递给控制器和指定的动作,无论其类型或名字!
答案 0 :(得分:2)
只需查看默认路线:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Default",
url: "{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }
);
关键位是UrlParameter.Optional
。这允许您提供如下操作:
public ActionResult Action1()
和
public ActionResult Action2(int id)
甚至:
public ActionResult Action3(int? id)
(后者允许参数为空值)
强制警告
请记住,有一些通用路线的注意事项。 MVC中的模型绑定器非常宽容。它只是尝试从可以从中收集信息的任何来源填充尽可能多的参数。因此,即使您的特定路线仅通过id1
,也不会阻止狡猾的用户随之加上?id2=something
。如果模型绑定器可以使用它,它将会。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
我想告诉你另一种方法。它可能不像你想要的那么容易。但关键部分是从声明转移到代码。所以你可以做更多的事情来调整你的设置。
与之前的回答相比,这个解决方案正在运行,做你想做的事。我不是在讨论你的意图,所以请把它作为一个有效的解决方案。
首先,我们将使用约束扩展声明,并将 id 参数命名为exotically:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Default2",
url: "{controller}/{action}/{theId1}-{theId2}",
defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", theId1 = 0, theId2 = 0 },
constraints: new { lang = new MyRouteConstraint() }
);
现在在约束中我们可以扩展值集合(重复我们的参数)
public class MyRouteConstraint : IRouteConstraint
{
public bool Match(System.Web.HttpContextBase httpContext, Route route, string parameterName, RouteValueDictionary values, RouteDirection routeDirection)
{
// for now skip the Url generation
if (routeDirection.Equals(RouteDirection.UrlGeneration))
{
return false;
}
// try to find out our parameters
object theId1 = null;
object theId2 = null;
var parametersExist = values.TryGetValue("theId1", out theId1)
&& values.TryGetValue("theId2", out theId2);
// not our case
if( ! parametersExist)
{
return false;
}
// first argument re-inserted
values["id1"] = theId1;
values["id3"] = theId1;
// TODO add other, remove theId1
// second argument re-inserted
values["id2"] = theId2;
values["id4"] = theId2;
// TODO add other, remove theId2
return true;
}
}
此解决方案不会消除您的网址路由设计决策的复杂性。但它允许您根据需要在代码中解决问题,可扩展的方式(例如反射)。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
好吧,我决定扩展Radim的想法并设计我自己的自定义路由约束(在this question中提到。
基本上,我现在只有一条路线匹配任何带有两个整数参数的路线,而不是拥有许多不同的路线:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "Default2",
url: "{controller}/{action}/{param1}-{param2}",
defaults: new { controller = "Admin", action = "Index" },
constraints: new { lang = new CustomRouteConstraint(new RoutePatternCollection( new List<ParamType> { ParamType.INT, ParamType.INT })) }
);
在Application_Start()
下的Global.asax
下,我为约束设置了控制器命名空间(这比每次尝试解决它更有效):
protected void Application_Start()
{
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
//should be called before RegisterRoutes
CustomRouteConstraint.SetControllerNamespace("********.Controllers");
WebApiConfig.Register(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
FilterConfig.RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
}
最后是自定义路由约束(我知道这是一大堆代码,可能过于复杂,但我认为这是相当自我解释的):
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.Routing;
using System.Web;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
namespace ********.Code
{
public class CustomRouteConstraint : IRouteConstraint
{
private static string controllerNamespace;
RoutePatternCollection patternCollection { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="CustomRouteConstraint"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rPC">The route pattern collection to match.</param>
public CustomRouteConstraint(RoutePatternCollection rPC)
{
this.patternCollection = rPC;
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(controllerNamespace)) {
controllerNamespace = Assembly.GetCallingAssembly().FullName.Split(new string[1] {","}, StringSplitOptions.None)
.FirstOrDefault().Trim().ToString();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Sets the controller namespace. Should be called before RegisterRoutes.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="_namespace">The namespace.</param>
public static void SetControllerNamespace(string _namespace)
{
controllerNamespace = _namespace;
}
/// <summary>
/// Attempts to match the current request to an action with the constraint pattern.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="httpContext">The current HTTPContext of the request.</param>
/// <param name="route">The route to which the constraint belongs.</param>
/// <param name="paramName">Name of the parameter (irrelevant).</param>
/// <param name="values">The url values to attempt to match.</param>
/// <param name="routeDirection">The route direction (this method will ignore URL Generations).</param>
/// <returns>True if a match has been found, false otherwise.</returns>
public bool Match(HttpContextBase httpContext, Route route, string paramName, RouteValueDictionary values, RouteDirection routeDirection)
{
if (routeDirection.Equals(RouteDirection.UrlGeneration)) {
return false;
}
Dictionary<string, object> unMappedList = values.Where(x => x.Key.Contains("param")).OrderBy(xi => xi.Key).ToDictionary(
kvp => kvp.Key, kvp => kvp.Value);
string controller = values["controller"] as string;
string action = values["action"] as string;
Type cont = TryFindController(controller);
if (cont != null) {
MethodInfo actionMethod = cont.GetMethod(action);
if (actionMethod != null) {
ParameterInfo[] methodParameters = actionMethod.GetParameters();
if (validateParameters(methodParameters, unMappedList)) {
for (int i = 0; i < methodParameters.Length; i++) {
var key = unMappedList.ElementAt(i).Key;
var value = values[key];
values.Remove(key);
values.Add(methodParameters.ElementAt(i).Name, value);
}
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
/// <summary>
/// Validates the parameter lists.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="methodParameters">The method parameters for the found action.</param>
/// <param name="values">The parameters from the RouteValueDictionary.</param>
/// <returns>True if the parameters all match, false if otherwise.</returns>
private bool validateParameters(ParameterInfo[] methodParameters, Dictionary<string, object> values)
{
//@TODO add flexibility for optional parameters
if (methodParameters.Count() != patternCollection.parameters.Count()) {
return false;
}
for (int i = 0; i < methodParameters.Length; i++) {
if (!matchType(methodParameters[i], patternCollection.parameters.ElementAt(i), values.ElementAt(i).Value)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
/// <summary>
/// Matches the type of the found action parameter to the expected parameter, also attempts data conversion.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="actualParam">The actual parameter of the found action.</param>
/// <param name="expectedParam">The expected parameter.</param>
/// <param name="value">The value of the RouteValueDictionary corresponding to that parameter.</param>
/// <returns>True if the parameters match, false if otherwise.</returns>
private bool matchType(ParameterInfo actualParam, ParamType expectedParam, object value)
{
try {
switch (expectedParam) {
case ParamType.BOOL:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.Boolean":
Convert.ToBoolean(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.DOUBLE:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.Double":
Convert.ToDouble(value);
return true;
break;
case "System.Decimal":
Convert.ToDecimal(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.INT:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.Int32":
Convert.ToInt32(value);
return true;
break;
case "System.Int16":
Convert.ToInt16(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.LONG:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.Int64":
Convert.ToInt64(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.STRING:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.String":
Convert.ToString(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.UINT:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.UInt32":
Convert.ToUInt32(value);
return true;
break;
case "System.UInt16":
Convert.ToUInt16(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
case ParamType.ULONG:
switch (actualParam.ParameterType.ToString()) {
case "System.UInt64":
Convert.ToUInt64(value);
return true;
break;
default:
return false;
break;
}
break;
default:
return false;
}
} catch (Exception) {
return false;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Attempts to discover a controller matching the one specified in the route.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="_controllerName">Name of the controller.</param>
/// <returns>A System.Type containing the found controller, or null if the contoller cannot be discovered.</returns>
private Type TryFindController(string _controllerName)
{
string controllerFullName;
Assembly executingAssembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(controllerNamespace)) {
controllerFullName = string.Format(controllerNamespace + ".Controllers.{0}Controller", _controllerName);
Type controller = executingAssembly.GetType(controllerFullName);
if (controller == null) {
if (controllerNamespace.Contains("Controllers")) {
controllerFullName = string.Format(controllerNamespace + ".{0}Controller", _controllerName);
if ((controller = executingAssembly.GetType(controllerFullName)) == null) {
controllerFullName = string.Format(controllerNamespace + ".{0}", _controllerName);
controller = executingAssembly.GetType(controllerFullName);
}
} else {
controllerFullName = string.Format(controllerNamespace + "Controllers.{0}", _controllerName);
controller = executingAssembly.GetType(controllerFullName);
}
}
return controller;
} else {
controllerFullName = string.Format(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().FullName.Split(new string[1] {","}, StringSplitOptions.None)
.FirstOrDefault().Trim().ToString() + ".Controllers.{0}Controller", _controllerName);
return Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetType(controllerFullName);
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// A list of the exepected parameters in the route.
/// </summary>
public struct RoutePatternCollection
{
public List<ParamType> parameters { get; set; }
public RoutePatternCollection(List<ParamType> _params) : this()
{
this.parameters = _params;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// The valid parameter types for a Custom Route Constraint.
/// </summary>
public enum ParamType
{
STRING,
INT,
UINT,
LONG,
ULONG,
BOOL,
DOUBLE
}
}
如果你看到它们,请随意提出改进建议!
答案 3 :(得分:0)
不要担心控制器方法中的参数名称。例如,“id”可能表示一种方法中的公司ID,另一种方法中的帐户ID。我有一个类似于此的路由的应用程序:
private const string IdRouteConstraint = @"^\d+$";
routes.MapRoute("TwoParameters",
"{controller}/{action}/{categoryId}/{id}",
new {controller = "Contents", action = "Index"},
new {categoryId = IdRouteConstraint, id = IdRouteConstraint});
routes.MapRoute("OneParameter",
"{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new {controller = "Contents", action = "Index"},
new {id = IdRouteConstraint});