Question

我的一个项目中有如下文件夹结构：

LIB
- bar.rb
- 巴
  - other_bar.rb
  - another_bar.rb
  - next_bar.rb
  - ...

bar.rb

require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + "/bar/other_bar.rb")

class Bar
  puts "running BarBase"
end

酒吧/ other_bar.rb

module Bar
  class OtherBar
    puts "running module Bar with class OtherBar"
  end
end

如果我现在运行ruby bar.rb我就明白了：

运行带有类OtherBar的模块栏 bar.rb：3：in''：Bar不是类（TypeError）

我想要一个类似于rails模型继承结构的结构。我怎样才能解决这个问题？据我所知，ruby不支持开箱即用。这种情况有解决办法吗？

Answer 1

Bar不能是模块和类，它们是不同的东西。

将bar.rb更改为module Bar或将other_bar.rb更改为class Bar。

无论是哪种，都必须保持一致。你不能改变一个到另一个。问题是它应该是什么？如果Bar是其他类的容器，并且只有一些全局单例方法？然后是module。但如果可以实例化，则它是class。

是的，你可以嵌套课程。这完全可以接受：

class Bar
  class OtherBar
    puts "running module Bar with class OtherBar"
  end
end

Bar::OtherBar.new # yay!

模块和类可以以您认为合适的任何方式嵌套在其他内容中。

使用一些注释示例进行编辑，以帮助清除这一切：

module Foo

  # Foo::A
  class A
    # simple namespaced class
  end

  # Foo::B, inherits from Foo::A
  class B < A
    # inherting from a class in the same namespace
  end

  # modify Foo::B
  class B
    # When modifying an existing class you don't need to define the superclass
    # again. It will raise an error if you reopen a class and define a different
    # superclass. But leaving it off is fine.
  end

  # nested module Foo::Inner
  module Inner

    # Foo::Inner::C 
    class C
      # simple more deeply namespaced class
    end

    # Foo::Inner::D, inherits from Foo::A
    class D < A
      # inherits from a class in a parent namespace

      # works because ruby looks upward in the nesting chain to find missing constants.
    end

    # Foo::Inner::Foo
    class Foo
      # simple nested class with the same name as something in a parent namespace

      # This is a totally different Foo, because it's in a different namespace
    end

    # Foo::Inner::E, inherits from Foo::Inner::Foo
    class E < Foo
      # class inhereting from another class in the same namespace

      # Foo::Inner::Foo is "closer" than the global Foo, so that gets found as the superclass
    end

    # Foo::Inner::F, which mixes in the gloabl module Foo
    class F
      # the :: constant prefix says to start looking in the global namespace
      # so here we include the top level module Foo, and not the "closer" in namespace Foo::Inner::Foo
      include ::Foo

      # This is an error. This attempts to include the class Foo::Inner::Foo since thats the closest by namespace
      # thing that matches the constant Foo. (you can't include classes, only modules)
      # You need the :: prefix to grab the global Foo module
      include Foo
    end

  end
end

# Z decalred in the global namespace, which inherits from the deeply nested class Foo::Inner::C
class Z < Foo::Inner::C
  # Any class anywhere can inherit from any other class in any namespace.
  # Just drill in!
end

# the following 2 declarations at this point would be identical

# This defines a class deep with in a namespace
class Foo::Inner::Foo::Bar < Foo::A
end

# same as above, but reopens each namespace
module Foo
  module Inner
    class Foo
      class Bar < ::Foo::A
      end
    end
  end
end

Answer 2

只需使用class Bar代替module Bar。在Ruby中，可以重新打开类并将其添加到。

Answer 3

建议不要将类用作命名空间，尤其是在使用Rails的情况下。

如果要将Bar类保留在lib/bar.rb中，可以选择将其他类移至lib/bars.rb中Bars命名空间中。

在此处详细了解原因：https://blog.jetbrains.com/ruby/2017/03/why-you-should-not-use-a-class-as-a-namespace-in-rails-applications/

更新：此行为在ruby 2.5中已修复

请参阅：https://blog.bigbinary.com/2017/10/18/ruby-2.5-has-removed-top-level-constant-lookup.html

ruby模块和类在结构中的名称相同

3 个答案: