我可以使以下IQueryable linq语句通用

时间:2012-11-01 15:24:07

标签: c# entity-framework generics linq-to-sql

有没有办法让以下数据库查询构建器通用?

private IQueryable<Foo> ByName(IQueryable<Foo> dbQuery, Query query)
{
    string[] searchTerms = query.Data.Replace(" ","").ToLower().Split(',');

    if (query.Exclude)
    {
        return dbQuery.Where(x => searchTerms.All(
            y => y != x.Name.Replace(" ", "").ToLower()));
    }

    return dbQuery.Where(x => searchTerms.Any(
        y => y == x.Name.Replace(" ", "").ToLower()));
}

我为Foo的许多不同属性提供了相同的功能。 ByCounty,ByTown,ByStreet等等。

我已经编写了一些返回linq的函数,如下所示

public Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> FoosAreWithinDistanceFromGeocode(
    double distance, Geocode geocode)
{
    double distanceSquare = distance * distance;
    return foo => ( SqlFunctions.Square((double)(
        foo.Address.Geocode.Easting - geocode.Easting)) +
        SqlFunctions.Square((double)(fooAddress.Geocode.Northing - 
        geocode.Northing)) ) <= distanceSquare;
}

但是我似乎无法找到Linq-to-SQL的东西是否不能使用泛型,或者是否可以将属性作为泛型和类似的东西传递。


编辑:我通常会针对单个搜索字词开展此工作。

Where [query.Data == "Foo1"]

return dbQuery.Where(SearchMatch("Name", query.Data));

public Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> SearchMatch(string propertyName, string searchTerm)
{
    var foo = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Foo), "foo");
    var prop = Expression.Property(foo, propertyName);
    var search = Expression.Constant(searchTerm);
    var equal = Expression.Equal(prop, search);

    return Expression.Lambda<Func<Foo, bool>>(equal, foo);
}

任何人都有任何想法如何让它适用于字符串数组?

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:5)

您需要定义一个公开您要访问的属性的接口,如下所示:

public interface IHaveName
{
    string Name { get; }
}

然后,在您的课程上,您将实现界面:

public class Foo : IHaveName

如果您正在使用从DBML文件生成的类,则这些类将使用partial keyword标记,因此实现该接口就像创建新文件一样简单,并插入:

public partial class Foo : IHaveName

由于该属性已在.dbml文件生成的 other .cs文件中声明为public,因此该接口是隐式实现的。

最后,您需要重写ByName方法,以获取具有实现接口IHaveName的约束的泛型类型参数:

private IQueryable<T> ByName<T>(IQueryable<T> dbQuery, Query query)
    where T : IHaveName
{
    // Everything else is the same.

对于您的其他属性(以及使用它们的方法),您可以将它们聚合到一个界面中,或根据您的需要将它们分开。


根据您的编辑,如果您想动态创建表达式,则不必放弃编译时安全性:

public Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> SearchMatch(
    Expression<Func<Foo, string>> property, string searchTerm)
{
    var foo = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Foo), "foo");
    // Get the property info from the property expression.
    var prop = Expression.Property(foo, 
        (property.Body as MemberExpression).Member as PropertyInfo);
    var search = Expression.Constant(searchTerm);
    var equal = Expression.Equal(prop, search);

    return Expression.Lambda<Func<Foo, bool>>(equal, foo);
}

然后你这样打电话:

var expression = SearchMatch(f => f.Name, "searchTerm");

这可确保您传递给SearchMatch的属性实际存在于Foo上。请注意,如果要为其他标量属性类型创建此泛型,请执行以下操作:

public Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> SearchMatch<T>(
    Expression<Func<Foo, T>> property, T searchTerm)
{
    var foo = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Foo), "foo");
    // Get the property info from the property expression.
    var prop = Expression.Property(foo, 
        (property.Body as MemberExpression).Member as PropertyInfo);
    var search = Expression.Constant(searchTerm);
    var equal = Expression.Equal(prop, search);

    return Expression.Lambda<Func<Foo, bool>>(equal, foo);
}

答案 1 :(得分:-1)

如果我明白你想要实现什么反思可能对你有所帮助。至少如果你玩的很好。这是一个简化但有效的例子

internal class Program
{
    private class Data
    {
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public string Address { get; set; }

        public override string ToString()
        {
            return String.Format("My name is {0} and I'm living at {1}", Name, Address);
        }
    }

    static Expression<Func<Data,bool>> BuildExpression(PropertyInfo prop, IQueryable<string> restrict)
    {
        return (data) => !restrict.Any(elem => elem == prop.GetValue(data, null));
    }

    static IQueryable<Data> FilterData(IQueryable<Data> input, Expression<Func<Data, bool>> filter)
    {
        return input.Where(filter);
    }

    public static void Main (string[] args)
    {
        List<Data> list = new List<Data>()
                               {
                                   new Data {Name = "John", Address = "1st Street"},
                                   new Data {Name = "Mary",Address = "2nd Street"},
                                   new Data {Name = "Carl", Address = "3rd Street"}
                               };

        var filterByNameExpression = BuildExpression(typeof (Data).GetProperty("Name"),
                                                     (new List<string> {"John", "Carl"}).AsQueryable());

        var filterByAddressExpression = BuildExpression(typeof(Data).GetProperty("Address"),
                                                     (new List<string> { "2nd Street"}).AsQueryable());

        IQueryable<Data> filetedByName = FilterData(list.AsQueryable(), filterByNameExpression);
        IQueryable<Data> filetedByAddress = FilterData(list.AsQueryable(), filterByAddressExpression);

        Console.WriteLine("Filtered by name");
        foreach (var d in filetedByName)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(d);
        }

        Console.WriteLine("Filtered by address");
        foreach (var d in filetedByAddress)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(d);
        }

        Console.ReadLine();
    }

Hovewer,我几乎可以肯定它不适用于LINQ-to-SQL。解决此问题的一种方法是在将IQueryable传递给此类过滤方法之前实现ToList(例如,通过调用它们上的{{1}})。