我编写了一个测试C ++程序来检查valgrind的输出。代码是
#include <iostream>
void f() {
int *pp = new int(1);
std::cout << "pp is " << *pp << "\n";
}
int main() {
f();
return 0;
}
我使用的valgrind命令是
valgrind --leak-check=yes ./a.out
Valgrind的输出
==2255== HEAP SUMMARY:
==2255== in use at exit: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==2255== total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 4 bytes allocated
==2255==
==2255== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==2255== at 0x4C2B1C7: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==2255== by 0x400786: f() (in /run/shm/a.out)
==2255== by 0x4007CC: main (in /run/shm/a.out)
==2255==
==2255== LEAK SUMMARY:
==2255== definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
==2255== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==2255== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==2255== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==2255== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
我使用的是Ubuntu机器: Linux Sun 3.2.0-27-generic#43-Ubuntu SMP Fri 7月6日14:25:57 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU / Linux
gcc版本“4.6.3”
gcc参数我使用了“-g -m64”
我认为它应该是8个字节,对吗?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
不,除非你的平台上有sizeof(int)==8
,否则它不应该是八个字节。
您正在分配和泄漏单个int
,而不是指针。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
您不分配指针数组,而是分配大小为1的整数数组。所以你只在内存中分配一个整数的大小。唯一的指针是存储新分配数组的地址的局部变量。
如果要分配指针,请执行void **arr = new void*[1];