我有一个较旧的基于ncurses的程序,它在一些文件上做了一些简单的IO(即:安装程序)。但是,从与PuTTY不同的终端,它与SIGBUS崩溃
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0x00000000004028b1 in fDisplay (ptr=Variable "ptr" is not available.
) at file_cpy.c:676
676 sprintf(p, " %-36s ", (*ptr)->datainfo.option);
(gdb) where
#0 0x00000000004028b1 in fDisplay (ptr=Variable "ptr" is not available.
) at file_cpy.c:676
#1 0x0000000000402cdb in fredraw (c=0x7fffffffe860) at file_cpy.c:696
#2 0x0000000000401996 in ls_dispatch (c=0x2020202020202020) at ds_cell.c:324
#3 0x0000000000403bf2 in main_dir (c=0x2020202020202020) at file_cpy.c:811
#4 0x0000000000403cb3 in main () at file_cpy.c:1345
(gdb) x/i $pc
0x4028b1 <fDisplay+17>: mov (%rax),%rdx
(gdb)
这种情况发生在Linux和FreeBSD上,无论ncurses版本和32/64位架构如何。我完全难过了。
这里调用fDisplay():
/*
* File redraw routine. Draws current list on screen.
*/
int fredraw (CELL * c)
{
register int row = c->srow;
dlistptr p = c->list_start;
int i = 0;
char buff[200];
if (c->ecol - c->scol)
sprintf(buff, "%*s",c->ecol - c->scol + 1, " ");
while (i <= c->erow - c->srow && p != NULL)
{
if (p == c->current) wattron(c->window,A_REVERSE);
mvaddstr (row , c->scol, fDisplay(&p));
if (p == c->current) wattroff(c->window,A_REVERSE);
row++; i++;
p = p->nextlistptr;
}
if (row <= c -> erow)
for (; row <= c -> erow ; row++)
mvaddstr(row, c->scol, buff);
wrefresh(c->window);
c -> redraw = FALSE;
return TRUE;
}
这里调用fredraw():
int main_dir(CELL *c) {
int i;
getcwd(current_path, sizeof(current_path));
strcat(current_path, "/.config.h");
load_file(current_path);
c->keytable = file_cpy_menu;
c->func_table = file_cpy_table;
c->ListEntryProc = File_Entry;
c->UpdateStatusProc = status_update;
c->redraw = TRUE;
c->ListExitProc = List_Exit;
c->ListPaintProc = fredraw;
c->srow = 3;
c->scol = 1;
c->erow = c->window->_maxy - 5;
c->ecol = c->window->_maxx - 1;
c->max_rows = c->window->_maxy;
c->max_cols = c->window->_maxx;
c->filename = "[ Config ]";
c->menu_bar = 0;
c->normcolor = 0x07;
c->barcolor = 0x1f;
init_dlist(c);
for (i = 0; config_type[i].option; i++)
insert_fdlist(c, &config_type[i]);
/*
* Go Do It
*/
do {
c->redraw = TRUE;
ls_dispatch(c);
} while (c->termkey != ESC && c->termkey != ALT_X);
return TRUE;
}
最后,main()调用上述函数:
int main() {
CELL file_cpy = {0};
WINDOW *mainwin;
mainwin = initscr();
start_color();
setup_colors();
cbreak();
noecho();
keypad(mainwin, TRUE);
meta(mainwin, TRUE);
raw();
leaveok(mainwin, TRUE);
wbkgd(mainwin, COLOR_PAIR(COLOR_MAIN));
wattron(mainwin, COLOR_PAIR(COLOR_MAIN));
werase(mainwin);
refresh();
file_cpy.window = mainwin;
main_dir(&file_cpy);
wbkgd(mainwin, A_NORMAL);
werase(mainwin);
echo();
nocbreak();
noraw();
refresh();
endwin();
return TRUE;
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
显然,您使用初始化为main_dir
的指针ls_dispatch
来呼叫c
和0x2020202020202020
。虽然完全不可能,但我觉得它不太可能,而且它看起来像是用空格覆盖指针。
valgrind
可能会有所帮助,或某种内存或堆栈保护检查。
为什么这取决于终端,我不能说;可能存在一些依赖于TERM的代码(例如“分配与屏幕上一样多的行”)。无论如何,这不是错误:它只是条件将错误带到了开放状态。这种错误通常是由硬连线常量引起的,有时候超出实际值(在上面的例子中,我可以说“分配96行”,假设 96行总是足够每个人;而有100行的TERM会影响假设并导致缓冲区溢出。
它也可能是调试器的工件,看看如何在堆栈上分配c
(但我不这么认为:它应该是c=0x7fffsomething
- 至少在系统中我检查了) 。无论如何,我通过使file_cpy
堆动态来重复这样的测试:
int main() {
CELL *file_cpy = NULL;
WINDOW *mainwin;
file_cpy = malloc(sizeof(CELL));
...
file_cpy->window = mainwin;
main_dir(file_cpy);
...
free(file_cpy); // file_cpy = NULL; // we immediately return
return TRUE;
然后我会尝试在整个main_dir
函数中列出指针的值,以防它被覆盖。