我有这个非常简单的c ++程序。多年来我做了一些C ++,所以我想我可能会再给它一次旋转。但我对我得到的输出感到惊讶。它应该是一个简单的程序,它已经让我有些头痛。
//2.cpp
//This program asks for the radius of the circle and
//prints the area of that circle
#include <iostream>
#include <stdlib.h>
int* area(char* radius[], int size)
{
int* pointer;
int areas[size];
pointer = areas;
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++)
{
areas[i] = 3.1416*atoi(radius[i])*atoi(radius[i]);
}
return pointer;
}
void print(char* radius[], int* area1, int size)
{
std::cout<<area1[2]<<std::endl; //This prints fine
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++)
{
std::cout << area1[i]; //This doesn't
std::cout << "Area for " << radius[i] << " is: " << area1[i] << std::endl;
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
if(argc > 1)
{
print(&argv[1],area(&argv[1],argc-1),argc-1);
}
else
{
//Please ignore this
}
return 0;
}
输入
./a.out 1 4 2 7 8
输出: -
12
134520896
Area for 1 is: 134520896
10
Area for 4 is: 10
-1217419175
Area for 2 is: -1217419175
-1217056780
Area for 7 is: -1217056780
-1217056780
Area for 8 is: -1217056780
答案 0 :(得分:10)
您的areas
数组具有自动存储持续时间,并且在area
返回后超出范围;然后解除引用pointer
是未定义的行为。请使用C ++惯用语,如std::string
和std::vector
,而不是C指针。
以下是您的代码的改进版(但仍然不是最佳版):
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstddef>
std::vector<double> area(const std::vector<double>& radius)
{
std::vector<double> areas(radius.size());
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < radius.size(); i++) {
areas[i] = 3.1416 * radius[i] * radius[i];
}
return areas;
}
void print(const std::vector<double>& radius, const std::vector<double>& area)
{
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < radius.size(); i++) {
std::cout << area[i]; //This doesn't
std::cout << "Area for " << radius[i] << " is: " << area[i] << std::endl;
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
if (argc > 1) {
std::vector<double> radii;
radii.reserve(argc - 1);
for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i) {
radii.push_back(std::atof(argv[i]));
}
print(radii, area(radii));
}
}
不幸的是编译器经常无法检测到这样的错误。使用像Valgrind这样的工具来查找它们。例如,通过Valgrind运行原始代码会给我带来许多错误:
$ valgrind ./a.out 1 4 2 7 8
==18488== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==18488== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==18488== Using Valgrind-3.8.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==18488== Command: ./a.out 1 4 2 7 8
==18488==
==18488== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==18488== at 0x4EC5D16: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x4EC5F4C: std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::do_put(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x4EC8E45: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<long>(long) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x400A01: print(char**, int*, int) (in /tmp/a.out)
==18488== by 0x400B0E: main (in /tmp/a.out)
==18488==
==18488== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==18488== at 0x4EBB133: ??? (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x4EC5D37: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x4EC5F4C: std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::do_put(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, long) const (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x4EC8E45: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<long>(long) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.17)
==18488== by 0x400A01: print(char**, int*, int) (in /tmp/a.out)
==18488== by 0x400B0E: main (in /tmp/a.out)
[…]
虽然我的版本没有错误。
答案 1 :(得分:3)
return pointer;
- 您正在返回一个指向局部变量的指针,该局部变量在堆栈上分配,并在退出函数时超出范围。
不幸的是,您的编译器不够聪明,无法识别,例如使用gcc
我必须返回areas
才能收到警告:warning: address of local variable ‘areas’ returned
答案 2 :(得分:2)
如果您重新开始使用C ++,我认为您应该看一下新标准 C ++ 11 。从维基百科页面开始。这是我的代码版本:
#include <algorithm>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
std::vector<double> area(const std::vector<double> & radii ) {
std::vector<double> areas(radii.size());
std::transform (radii.begin(), radii.end(), areas.begin(),
[](const double &r){ return 3.15159*r*r; } );
return areas;
}
void printit(const std::vector<double> &r, const std::vector<double> &a) {
for(size_t i = 0; i < r.size(); ++i) {
std::cout << "Area for " << r.at(i) << " is: " << a.at(i) << std::endl;
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
std::vector<double> r(argc-1);
std::transform (argv+1, argv+argc,r.begin(),
[](const std::string &r){ return stod(r); } );
auto areas=area(r);
printit(r,areas);
}
答案 3 :(得分:1)
您正在从此函数返回指向无效内存的指针。
int* area(char* radius[], int size)
{
int* pointer;
int areas[size];
pointer = areas;
// ...
return pointer;
}
int areas[size]
仅在此功能期间存在。您正在返回指向未定义内存的指针。
答案 4 :(得分:0)
areas
是一个整数,但你把一个浮点数放进去......
计算给出可能与正确结果不同的结果的半径时!
areas[i] = 3.1416*atoi(radius[i])*atoi(radius[i]);
答案 5 :(得分:0)
Radius是一个指向字符串“1”的指针,但是你正在单步执行argc值,这是错误的。