我根据我的需要调整了Jeff Sharkey的SeparatedListAdapter,得到了类似的结果:
public class SeparatedListAdapter<T> extends BaseAdapter {
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
private final String LOG_TAG = getClass().getSimpleName();
public final static int TYPE_SECTION_HEADER = 0;
public final Map<T, Adapter> sectionAdapters;
public final ArrayAdapter<T> headerAdapter;
public SeparatedListAdapter(ArrayAdapter<T> headerAdapter) {
super();
this.sectionAdapters = new LinkedHashMap<T,Adapter>();
this.headerAdapter = headerAdapter;
}
public void addSection(T section, Adapter adapter) {
this.headerAdapter.add(section);
this.sectionAdapters.put(section, adapter);
}
public void clearSections() {
this.headerAdapter.clear();
this.sectionAdapters.clear();
}
@Override
public int getCount() {
// total together all sections, plus one for each section header
int total = 0;
for(Adapter adapter : this.sectionAdapters.values())
total += adapter.getCount() + 1;
return total;
}
@Override
public int getViewTypeCount() {
//count headers, then total all sections
int total = this.headerAdapter.getViewTypeCount();
for(Adapter adapter : this.sectionAdapters.values())
total += adapter.getViewTypeCount();
return total;
}
@Override
public int getItemViewType(int position) {
int type = 1;
for(Object section : this.sectionAdapters.keySet()) {
Adapter adapter = sectionAdapters.get(section);
int size = adapter.getCount() + 1;
// check if position inside this section
if(position == 0) return TYPE_SECTION_HEADER;
if(position < size) return type + adapter.getItemViewType(position - 1);
// otherwise jump into next section
position -= size;
type += adapter.getViewTypeCount();
}
return -1;
}
@Override
public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
int sectionnum = 0;
for(Object section : this.sectionAdapters.keySet()) {
Adapter adapter = sectionAdapters.get(section);
int size = adapter.getCount() + 1;
// check if position inside this section
if(position == 0)
return headerAdapter.getView(sectionnum, convertView, parent);
if(position < size)
return adapter.getView(position - 1, convertView, parent);
// otherwise jump into next section
position -= size;
sectionnum++;
}
return null;
}
@Override
public boolean areAllItemsEnabled() {
return false;
}
@Override
public boolean isEnabled(int position) {
return (getItemViewType(position) != TYPE_SECTION_HEADER);
}
}
我遇到的问题是API将onvertView对象从错误的适配器提供给getView(),从而导致出现问题。我想我正确实现了getViewTypeCount()和getItemViewType()并使用调试器进行了检查。还有什么可能出错?
这是我的一个适配器:
public static class MeetingAdapter extends ArrayAdapter<Meeting> {
static class ViewHolder {
TextView title;
}
private LayoutInflater inflater;
public MeetingAdapter(Activity context, List<Meeting> meetings) {
super(context, 0, meetings);
this.inflater = LayoutInflater.from(context);
}
@Override
public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
Meeting meeting = getItem(position);
View rowView = convertView;
ViewHolder holder;
// instanceof should not be necessary!!! normally convertView should be of the right type!
if (rowView == null || !(rowView.getTag() instanceof ViewHolder)) {
rowView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item, null);
holder = new ViewHolder();
holder.title = (TextView)rowView; // tmp - layout contains only a textview for the moment
rowView.setTag(holder);
} else {
holder = (ViewHolder)rowView.getTag();
}
holder.title.setText(meeting.getTrack());
return rowView;
}
}
请帮忙吗?为此疯狂。
答案 0 :(得分:20)
我将问题描述为listviews的RecybleBin对象。它根据getItemViewType中报告的类型存储可能的convertViews,但是在更改数据集(因此位置)之后,它的内容永远不会更新,然后当你的适配器获得过去的类型时,#34; X&#34;根据其位置查看,但现在它恰好是一种类型&#34; Y&#34;。 一个解决方案是手动检查getView,不仅convertView为null,而且它的类型正确(有时候真的很尴尬......如果你使用视图持有者模式,你可以检查标签是否匹配你对应的观察者类)