有没有办法在Javascript中确定对象是使用object-literal表示法还是使用构造函数方法创建的?
在我看来,你只是访问它的父对象,但如果你传入的对象没有引用它的父对象,我认为你不能告诉它,你呢?
答案 0 :(得分:11)
编辑:我正在将“对象文字”解释为使用对象文字或 Object
构造函数创建的任何内容。这就是John Resig最有可能的意思。
即使.constructor
被污染了,或者对象是在另一个框架中创建的,我也有一个功能。请注意,Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === "[object Object]"
(有些人可能认为)无法解决此问题。
function isObjectLiteral(obj) {
if (typeof obj !== "object" || obj === null)
return false;
var hasOwnProp = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,
ObjProto = obj;
// get obj's Object constructor's prototype
while (Object.getPrototypeOf(ObjProto = Object.getPrototypeOf(ObjProto)) !== null);
if (!Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative) // workaround if non-native Object.getPrototypeOf
for (var prop in obj)
if (!hasOwnProp.call(obj, prop) && !hasOwnProp.call(ObjProto, prop)) // inherited elsewhere
return false;
return Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === ObjProto;
};
if (!Object.getPrototypeOf) {
if (typeof ({}).__proto__ === "object") {
Object.getPrototypeOf = function (obj) {
return obj.__proto__;
};
Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = true;
} else {
Object.getPrototypeOf = function (obj) {
var constructor = obj.constructor,
oldConstructor;
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, "constructor")) {
oldConstructor = constructor;
if (!(delete obj.constructor)) // reset constructor
return null; // can't delete obj.constructor, return null
constructor = obj.constructor; // get real constructor
obj.constructor = oldConstructor; // restore constructor
}
return constructor ? constructor.prototype : null; // needed for IE
};
Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = false;
}
} else Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = true;
以下是测试用例的HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<!-- Online here: http://code.eligrey.com/testcases/all/isObjectLiteral.html -->
<title>isObjectLiteral</title>
<style type="text/css">
li { background: green; } li.FAIL { background: red; }
iframe { display: none; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul id="results"></ul>
<script type="text/javascript">
function isObjectLiteral(obj) {
if (typeof obj !== "object" || obj === null)
return false;
var hasOwnProp = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,
ObjProto = obj;
// get obj's Object constructor's prototype
while (Object.getPrototypeOf(ObjProto = Object.getPrototypeOf(ObjProto)) !== null);
if (!Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative) // workaround if non-native Object.getPrototypeOf
for (var prop in obj)
if (!hasOwnProp.call(obj, prop) && !hasOwnProp.call(ObjProto, prop)) // inherited elsewhere
return false;
return Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === ObjProto;
};
if (!Object.getPrototypeOf) {
if (typeof ({}).__proto__ === "object") {
Object.getPrototypeOf = function (obj) {
return obj.__proto__;
};
Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = true;
} else {
Object.getPrototypeOf = function (obj) {
var constructor = obj.constructor,
oldConstructor;
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, "constructor")) {
oldConstructor = constructor;
if (!(delete obj.constructor)) // reset constructor
return null; // can't delete obj.constructor, return null
constructor = obj.constructor; // get real constructor
obj.constructor = oldConstructor; // restore constructor
}
return constructor ? constructor.prototype : null; // needed for IE
};
Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = false;
}
} else Object.getPrototypeOf.isNative = true;
// Function serialization is not permitted
// Does not work across all browsers
Function.prototype.toString = function(){};
// The use case that we want to match
log("{}", {}, true);
// Instantiated objects shouldn't be matched
log("new Date", new Date, false);
var fn = function(){};
// Makes the function a little more realistic
// (and harder to detect, incidentally)
fn.prototype = {someMethod: function(){}};
// Functions shouldn't be matched
log("fn", fn, false);
// Again, instantiated objects shouldn't be matched
log("new fn", new fn, false);
var fn2 = function(){};
log("new fn2", new fn2, false);
var fn3 = function(){};
fn3.prototype = {}; // impossible to detect (?) without native Object.getPrototypeOf
log("new fn3 (only passes with native Object.getPrototypeOf)", new fn3, false);
log("null", null, false);
log("undefined", undefined, false);
/* Note:
* The restriction against instantiated functions is
* due to the fact that this method will be used for
* deep-cloning an object. Instantiated objects will
* just have their reference copied over, whereas
* plain objects will need to be completely cloned.
*/
var iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
var doc = iframe.contentDocument || iframe.contentWindow.document;
doc.open();
doc.write("<body onload='window.top.iframeDone(Object);'>");
doc.close();
function iframeDone(otherObject){
// Objects from other windows should be matched
log("new otherObject", new otherObject, true);
}
function log(msg, a, b) {
var pass = isObjectLiteral(a) === b ? "PASS" : "FAIL";
document.getElementById("results").innerHTML +=
"<li class='" + pass + "'>" + msg + "</li>";
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
答案 1 :(得分:11)
我刚刚在一个甜蜜的hackfest中遇到了这个问题和线程,其中涉及一个圣杯任务,用于评估一个对象是用{}创建的还是新的Object()(我还没想到它。)
无论如何,我很惊讶地发现这里发布的isObjectLiteral()函数和我为Pollen.JS项目编写的我自己的isObjLiteral()函数之间的相似性。我相信这个解决方案是在我的Pollen.JS提交之前发布的,所以 - 对你说!我的好处是长度...不到一半(包括你的设置例程),但两者产生相同的结果。
看看:
function isObjLiteral(_obj) { var _test = _obj; return ( typeof _obj !== 'object' || _obj === null ? false : ( (function () { while (!false) { if ( Object.getPrototypeOf( _test = Object.getPrototypeOf(_test) ) === null) { break; } } return Object.getPrototypeOf(_obj) === _test; })() ) ); }
此外,还有一些测试内容:
var _cases= { _objLit : {}, _objNew : new Object(), _function : new Function(), _array : new Array(), _string : new String(), _image : new Image(), _bool: true }; console.dir(_cases); for ( var _test in _cases ) { console.group(_test); console.dir( { type: typeof _cases[_test], string: _cases[_test].toString(), result: isObjLiteral(_cases[_test]) }); console.groupEnd(); }
或者在jsbin.com上...
当你到达那里时一定要打开萤火虫 - 为IE爱好者调试文件。
答案 2 :(得分:6)
听起来你正在寻找这个:
function Foo() {}
var a = {};
var b = new Foo();
console.log(a.constructor == Object); // true
console.log(b.constructor == Object); // false
对象上的构造函数属性是指向用于构造它的函数的指针。在上面的示例b.constructor == Foo
中。如果对象是使用大括号(数组文字表示法)或使用new Object()
创建的,则其构造函数属性将为== Object
。
更新: crescentfresh指出$(document).constructor == Object
而不是等于jQuery构造函数,所以我做了一点挖掘。似乎通过使用对象文字作为对象的原型,您渲染构造函数属性几乎一文不值:
function Foo() {}
var obj = new Foo();
obj.constructor == Object; // false
但:
function Foo() {}
Foo.prototype = { objectLiteral: true };
var obj = new Foo();
obj.constructor == Object; // true
在另一个答案here中有一个非常好的解释,以及更为复杂的解释here。
我认为其他答案是正确的,并没有真正的方法可以检测到这一点。
答案 3 :(得分:4)
对象文字是用于定义对象的符号 - 在javascript中,它始终采用由大括号括起的名称 - 值对的形式。一旦执行了这个,就无法判断该对象是否是由这种符号创建的(实际上,我认为这可能是过度简化,但基本上是正确的)。你只有一个对象。这是关于js的一个伟大的事情,因为有许多捷径可以做更长的写作时间。简而言之,字面符号代替了必须写:
var myobject = new Object();
答案 4 :(得分:4)
你想要的是:
Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype
这将检查该对象是使用new Object()
或{...}
创建的普通对象,而不是Object
的某些子类。
答案 5 :(得分:2)
没有办法区分从对象文字构建的对象和用其他方法构建的对象。
这有点像询问你是否可以通过赋值'2'或'3-1'来确定是否构造了数值变量;
如果您需要这样做,则必须在对象文字中加入一些特定的签名,以便稍后检测。
答案 6 :(得分:1)
我有同样的问题,所以我决定采用这种方式:
function isPlainObject(val) {
return val ? val.constructor === {}.constructor : false;
}
// Examples:
isPlainObject({}); // true
isPlainObject([]); // false
isPlainObject(new Human("Erik", 25)); // false
isPlainObject(new Date); // false
isPlainObject(new RegExp); // false
//and so on...
答案 7 :(得分:1)
如今,有一个更优雅的解决方案可以完全回答您的问题:
function isObject(value) {
return value !== null && value !== undefined && Object.is(value.constructor, Object)
}
// Test stuff below //
class MyClass extends Object {
constructor(args) {
super(args)
}
say() {
console.log('hello')
}
}
function MyProto() {
Object.call(this)
}
MyProto.prototype = Object.assign(Object.create(Object.prototype), {
constructor: MyProto,
say: function() {
console.log('hello')
}
});
const testsCases = {
objectLiteral: {},
objectFromNew: new Object(),
null: null,
undefined: undefined,
number: 123,
function: new Function(),
array: new Array([1, 2, 3]),
string: new String('foobar'),
image: new Image(),
bool: true,
error: new Error('oups'),
myClass: new MyClass(),
myProto: new MyProto()
}
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(testsCases)) {
console.log(`${key.padEnd(15)} => ${isObject(value)}`)
}
最诚挚的问候
答案 8 :(得分:0)
这里 11 岁的问题是我的整洁解决方案,对边缘情况建议持开放态度; 步骤 -> 仅查找对象然后比较以检查属性 -> 对象文字没有长度、原型和边缘情况 stringyfy 属性。
尝试测试 JSON 和 Object.create(Object.create({cool: "joes"})).
"use strict"
let isObjectL = a => {
if (typeof a !=='object' || ['Number','String','Boolean', 'Symbol'].includes(a.constructor.name)) return false;
let props = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a);
if ( !props.includes('length') && !props.includes('prototype') || !props.includes('stringify')) return true;
};
let A={type:"Fiat", model:"500", color:"white"};
let B= new Object();
let C = { "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"};
let D= '{ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"}';
let E = JSON.parse(D);
let F = new Boolean();
let G = new Number();
console.log(isObjectL(A));
console.log(isObjectL(B));
console.log(isObjectL(C));
console.log(isObjectL(D));
console.log(isObjectL(E));
console.log(isObjectL(JSON));
console.log(isObjectL(F));
console.log(isObjectL(G));
console.log(isObjectL(
Object.create(Object.create({cool: "joes"}))));
console.log(isObjectL());
另一个显示内部工作的变体
isObject=function(a) {
let exclude = ['Number','String','Boolean', 'Symbol'];
let types = typeof a;
let props = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a);
console.log((types ==='object' && !exclude.includes(a.constructor.name) &&
( !props.includes('length') && !props.includes('prototype') && !props.includes('stringify'))));
return `type: ${types} props: ${props}
----------------`}
A={type:"Fiat", model:"500", color:"white"};
B= new Object();
C = { "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"};
D= '{ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"}';
E = JSON.parse(D);
F = new Boolean();
G = new Number();
console.log(isObject(A));
console.log(isObject(B));
console.log(isObject(C));
console.log(isObject(D));
console.log(isObject(E));
console.log(isObject(JSON));
console.log(isObject(F));
console.log(isObject(G));
console.log(isObject(
Object.create(Object.create({cool: "joes"}))));