我是春豆的新手。我指的是书籍和博客。在某些情况下,上下文配置为<beans:bean>
,有些仅为<beans>
。有什么不同?我们应该在上下文文件中提供XML命名空间吗?它是否会在应用程序部署时引用该实际站点?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
就Spring而言无关紧要 - XML必须是有效的,以便Spring可以理解它,就是这样。您可以选择哪种格式。通常,您使用默认命名空间来避免键入太多(所有示例都基于Appendix C. XML Schema-based configuration):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd">
<bean id="..."/>
</beans>
xmlns="..."
属性定义默认命名空间(如果您根本没有指定任何命名空间,则使用该命名空间,例如<beans/>
。只要您只使用单个beans
命名空间,这就没用了偶尔也很少来自其他命名空间的声明:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:util="http://www.springframework.org/schema/util"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/util http://www.springframework.org/schema/util/spring-util-3.0.xsd">
<bean id="..." class="...">
<property name="isolation">
<util:constant static-field="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"/>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>
但有时您会注意到,与默认beans
命名空间相比,您使用的是来自不同命名空间的更多节点。一个很好的例子是Spring Security configuration文件:
<beans xmlns:security="http://www.springframework.org/schema/security"
xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security/spring-security-3.0.3.xsd">
<security:http auto-config='true'>
<security:intercept-url pattern="/login.jsp*" access="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"/>
<security:intercept-url pattern="/**" access="ROLE_USER" />
<security:form-login login-page='/login.jsp'/>
<security:session-management>
<security:concurrency-control max-sessions="1" />
</security:session-management>
<security:openid-login>
<security:attribute-exchange>
<security:openid-attribute name="email" type="http://axschema.org/contact/email" required="true" />
<security:openid-attribute name="name" type="http://axschema.org/namePerson" />
</security:attribute-exchange>
</security:openid-login>
</security:http>
<security:authentication-manager>
<security:authentication-provider user-service-ref='myUserDetailsService'/>
</security:authentication-manager>
<bean id="myUserDetailsService" class="org.springframework.security.core.userdetails.jdbc.JdbcDaoImpl">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>
</beans>
你看到它有多笨拙,因为beans
默认命名空间的使用很少,但整个文件必须用security:
前缀混乱?那怎么样(注意xmlns
名称空间声明如何变化):
<beans:beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/security"
xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security/spring-security-3.0.3.xsd">
<http auto-config='true'>
<intercept-url pattern="/login.jsp*" access="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/**" access="ROLE_USER" />
<form-login login-page='/login.jsp'/>
<session-management>
<concurrency-control max-sessions="1" />
</session-management>
<openid-login>
<attribute-exchange>
<openid-attribute name="email" type="http://axschema.org/contact/email" required="true" />
<openid-attribute name="name" type="http://axschema.org/namePerson" />
</attribute-exchange>
</openid-login>
</http>
<authentication-manager>
<authentication-provider user-service-ref='myUserDetailsService'/>
</authentication-manager>
<beans:bean id="myUserDetailsService" class="org.springframework.security.core.userdetails.jdbc.JdbcDaoImpl">
<beans:property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</beans:bean>
</beans:beans>
这两个配置文件在语义上是等效的(它只是对相同信息进行编码的不同方式)。但后者更具可读性。只需使用默认命名空间,无论使用哪个命名空间。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
它取决于XML命名空间配置而不是Spring功能,对代码没有任何区别,对编码器有所不同,实际上是在根xml元素上定义xmlns
属性的效果。 Read more about <beans:bean>
in this chapter of Spring Security(实际上它与Spring Framework不同,但非常常见,并且在XML文件中使用自己的命名空间)。你可以写:
<beans:beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/security"
xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security/spring-security-3.1.xsd">
<global-method-security pre-post-annotations="enabled">
<expression-handler ref="expressionHandler"/>
</global-method-security>
<beans:bean id="expressionHandler" class=
"org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler">
<beans:property name="permissionEvaluator" ref="myPermissionEvaluator"/>
</beans:bean>
</beans:beans>
相当于:
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" <!-- see the difference here? -->
xmlns:security="http://www.springframework.org/schema/security"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security
http://www.springframework.org/schema/security/spring-security-3.1.xsd">
<security:global-method-security pre-post-annotations="enabled">
<security:expression-handler ref="expressionHandler"/>
</security:global-method-security>
<bean id="expressionHandler" class=
"org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler">
<property name="permissionEvaluator" ref="myPermissionEvaluator"/>
</bean>
</beans>
我个人总是使用bean作为主命名空间,但这是习惯问题。