是否可以使用高级字符串格式化方法进行部分字符串格式化,类似于字符串模板safe_substitute()
函数?
例如:
s = '{foo} {bar}'
s.format(foo='FOO') #Problem: raises KeyError 'bar'
答案 0 :(得分:100)
如果您知道格式化的是什么顺序:
s = '{foo} {{bar}}'
像这样使用:
ss = s.format(foo='FOO')
print ss
>>> 'FOO {bar}'
print ss.format(bar='BAR')
>>> 'FOO BAR'
您无法同时指定foo
和bar
- 您必须按顺序执行此操作。
答案 1 :(得分:55)
您可以使用partial
中的functools
函数,该函数简短,最具可读性,并且最能说明编码人员的意图:
from functools import partial
s = partial("{foo} {bar}".format, foo="FOO")
print s(bar="BAR")
# FOO BAR
答案 2 :(得分:42)
您可以通过覆盖映射将其欺骗为部分格式化:
import string
class FormatDict(dict):
def __missing__(self, key):
return "{" + key + "}"
s = '{foo} {bar}'
formatter = string.Formatter()
mapping = FormatDict(foo='FOO')
print(formatter.vformat(s, (), mapping))
印刷
FOO {bar}
当然,这个基本实现仅适用于基本情况。
答案 3 :(得分:42)
.format()
的这种限制 - 无法进行部分替换 - 一直困扰着我。
在评估编写自定义Formatter
类之后,如此处的许多答案所述,甚至考虑使用第三方软件包,例如lazy_format,我发现了一个更简单的内置解决方案:Template strings < / p>
它提供了类似的功能,但也通过safe_substitute()
方法提供部分替换。模板字符串需要有$
前缀(感觉有点奇怪 - 但我觉得整体解决方案更好)。
import string
template = string.Template('${x} ${y}')
try:
template.substitute({'x':1}) # raises KeyError
except KeyError:
pass
# but the following raises no error
partial_str = template.safe_substitute({'x':1}) # no error
# partial_str now contains a string with partial substitution
partial_template = string.Template(partial_str)
substituted_str = partial_template.safe_substitute({'y':2}) # no error
print substituted_str # prints '12'
基于此形成了一个便利包装:
class StringTemplate(object):
def __init__(self, template):
self.template = string.Template(template)
self.partial_substituted_str = None
def __repr__(self):
return self.template.safe_substitute()
def format(self, *args, **kws):
self.partial_substituted_str = self.template.safe_substitute(*args, **kws)
self.template = string.Template(self.partial_substituted_str)
return self.__repr__()
>>> s = StringTemplate('${x}${y}')
>>> s
'${x}${y}'
>>> s.format(x=1)
'1${y}'
>>> s.format({'y':2})
'12'
>>> print s
12
同样是基于Sven答案的包装器,它使用默认的字符串格式:
class StringTemplate(object):
class FormatDict(dict):
def __missing__(self, key):
return "{" + key + "}"
def __init__(self, template):
self.substituted_str = template
self.formatter = string.Formatter()
def __repr__(self):
return self.substituted_str
def format(self, *args, **kwargs):
mapping = StringTemplate.FormatDict(*args, **kwargs)
self.substituted_str = self.formatter.vformat(self.substituted_str, (), mapping)
答案 4 :(得分:27)
不确定这是否可以作为快速解决方法,但
怎么样s = '{foo} {bar}'
s.format(foo='FOO', bar='{bar}')
? :)
答案 5 :(得分:11)
如果您定义自己的Formatter
覆盖get_value
方法,则可以使用该方法将未定义的字段名称映射到您想要的任何内容:
http://docs.python.org/library/string.html#string.Formatter.get_value
例如,如果bar
不在kwargs中,您可以将"{bar}"
映射到bar
。
但是,这需要使用Formatter对象的format()
方法,而不是字符串的format()
方法。
答案 6 :(得分:9)
>>> 'fd:{uid}:{{topic_id}}'.format(uid=123)
'fd:123:{topic_id}'
试试这个。
答案 7 :(得分:7)
感谢Amber的评论,我提出了这个问题:
import string
try:
# Python 3
from _string import formatter_field_name_split
except ImportError:
formatter_field_name_split = str._formatter_field_name_split
class PartialFormatter(string.Formatter):
def get_field(self, field_name, args, kwargs):
try:
val = super(PartialFormatter, self).get_field(field_name, args, kwargs)
except (IndexError, KeyError, AttributeError):
first, _ = formatter_field_name_split(field_name)
val = '{' + field_name + '}', first
return val
答案 8 :(得分:3)
对我而言,这已经足够了:
>>> ss = 'dfassf {} dfasfae efaef {} fds'
>>> nn = ss.format('f1', '{}')
>>> nn
'dfassf f1 dfasfae efaef {} fds'
>>> n2 = nn.format('whoa')
>>> n2
'dfassf f1 dfasfae efaef whoa fds'
答案 9 :(得分:3)
我发现的所有解决方案似乎在使用更高级的规格或转换选项方面均存在问题。 @SvenMarnach的FormatPlaceholder非常聪明,但是不能强制使用(例如{a!s:>2s}
),因为它调用__str__
方法(在此示例中)而不是__format__
,并且您将丢失任何其他格式。
这是我最终得到的结果,并且其中包括一些关键功能:
sformat('The {} is {}', 'answer')
'The answer is {}'
sformat('The answer to {question!r} is {answer:0.2f}', answer=42)
'The answer to {question!r} is 42.00'
sformat('The {} to {} is {:0.{p}f}', 'answer', 'everything', p=4)
'The answer to everything is {:0.4f}'
str.format
类似的界面(不仅仅是映射){k!s}
{!r}
{k:>{size}}
{k.foo}
{k[0]}
{k!s:>{size}}
import string
class SparseFormatter(string.Formatter):
"""
A modified string formatter that handles a sparse set of format
args/kwargs.
"""
# re-implemented this method for python2/3 compatibility
def vformat(self, format_string, args, kwargs):
used_args = set()
result, _ = self._vformat(format_string, args, kwargs, used_args, 2)
self.check_unused_args(used_args, args, kwargs)
return result
def _vformat(self, format_string, args, kwargs, used_args, recursion_depth,
auto_arg_index=0):
if recursion_depth < 0:
raise ValueError('Max string recursion exceeded')
result = []
for literal_text, field_name, format_spec, conversion in \
self.parse(format_string):
orig_field_name = field_name
# output the literal text
if literal_text:
result.append(literal_text)
# if there's a field, output it
if field_name is not None:
# this is some markup, find the object and do
# the formatting
# handle arg indexing when empty field_names are given.
if field_name == '':
if auto_arg_index is False:
raise ValueError('cannot switch from manual field '
'specification to automatic field '
'numbering')
field_name = str(auto_arg_index)
auto_arg_index += 1
elif field_name.isdigit():
if auto_arg_index:
raise ValueError('cannot switch from manual field '
'specification to automatic field '
'numbering')
# disable auto arg incrementing, if it gets
# used later on, then an exception will be raised
auto_arg_index = False
# given the field_name, find the object it references
# and the argument it came from
try:
obj, arg_used = self.get_field(field_name, args, kwargs)
except (IndexError, KeyError):
# catch issues with both arg indexing and kwarg key errors
obj = orig_field_name
if conversion:
obj += '!{}'.format(conversion)
if format_spec:
format_spec, auto_arg_index = self._vformat(
format_spec, args, kwargs, used_args,
recursion_depth, auto_arg_index=auto_arg_index)
obj += ':{}'.format(format_spec)
result.append('{' + obj + '}')
else:
used_args.add(arg_used)
# do any conversion on the resulting object
obj = self.convert_field(obj, conversion)
# expand the format spec, if needed
format_spec, auto_arg_index = self._vformat(
format_spec, args, kwargs,
used_args, recursion_depth-1,
auto_arg_index=auto_arg_index)
# format the object and append to the result
result.append(self.format_field(obj, format_spec))
return ''.join(result), auto_arg_index
def sformat(s, *args, **kwargs):
# type: (str, *Any, **Any) -> str
"""
Sparse format a string.
Parameters
----------
s : str
args : *Any
kwargs : **Any
Examples
--------
>>> sformat('The {} is {}', 'answer')
'The answer is {}'
>>> sformat('The answer to {question!r} is {answer:0.2f}', answer=42)
'The answer to {question!r} is 42.00'
>>> sformat('The {} to {} is {:0.{p}f}', 'answer', 'everything', p=4)
'The answer to everything is {:0.4f}'
Returns
-------
str
"""
return SparseFormatter().format(s, *args, **kwargs)
在编写了一些关于我希望这种方法如何运行的测试之后,我发现了各种实现的问题。如果有人发现他们有见地,它们就会在下面。
import pytest
def test_auto_indexing():
# test basic arg auto-indexing
assert sformat('{}{}', 4, 2) == '42'
assert sformat('{}{} {}', 4, 2) == '42 {}'
def test_manual_indexing():
# test basic arg indexing
assert sformat('{0}{1} is not {1} or {0}', 4, 2) == '42 is not 2 or 4'
assert sformat('{0}{1} is {3} {1} or {0}', 4, 2) == '42 is {3} 2 or 4'
def test_mixing_manualauto_fails():
# test mixing manual and auto args raises
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
assert sformat('{!r} is {0}{1}', 4, 2)
def test_kwargs():
# test basic kwarg
assert sformat('{base}{n}', base=4, n=2) == '42'
assert sformat('{base}{n}', base=4, n=2, extra='foo') == '42'
assert sformat('{base}{n} {key}', base=4, n=2) == '42 {key}'
def test_args_and_kwargs():
# test mixing args/kwargs with leftovers
assert sformat('{}{k} {v}', 4, k=2) == '42 {v}'
# test mixing with leftovers
r = sformat('{}{} is the {k} to {!r}', 4, 2, k='answer')
assert r == '42 is the answer to {!r}'
def test_coercion():
# test coercion is preserved for skipped elements
assert sformat('{!r} {k!r}', '42') == "'42' {k!r}"
def test_nesting():
# test nesting works with or with out parent keys
assert sformat('{k:>{size}}', k=42, size=3) == ' 42'
assert sformat('{k:>{size}}', size=3) == '{k:>3}'
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
('s', 'expected'),
[
('{a} {b}', '1 2.0'),
('{z} {y}', '{z} {y}'),
('{a} {a:2d} {a:04d} {y:2d} {z:04d}', '1 1 0001 {y:2d} {z:04d}'),
('{a!s} {z!s} {d!r}', '1 {z!s} {\'k\': \'v\'}'),
('{a!s:>2s} {z!s:>2s}', ' 1 {z!s:>2s}'),
('{a!s:>{a}s} {z!s:>{z}s}', '1 {z!s:>{z}s}'),
('{a.imag} {z.y}', '0 {z.y}'),
('{e[0]:03d} {z[0]:03d}', '042 {z[0]:03d}'),
],
ids=[
'normal',
'none',
'formatting',
'coercion',
'formatting+coercion',
'nesting',
'getattr',
'getitem',
]
)
def test_sformat(s, expected):
# test a bunch of random stuff
data = dict(
a=1,
b=2.0,
c='3',
d={'k': 'v'},
e=[42],
)
assert expected == sformat(s, **data)
答案 10 :(得分:1)
这是一个基于正则表达式的轻度漏洞解决方案。请注意,这将不与{foo:{width}}
之类的嵌套格式说明符一起使用,但是它确实解决了其他答案存在的一些问题。
def partial_format(s, **kwargs):
parts = re.split(r'(\{[^}]*\})', s)
for k, v in kwargs.items():
for idx, part in enumerate(parts):
if re.match(rf'\{{{k}[!:}}]', part): # Placeholder keys must always be followed by '!', ':', or the closing '}'
parts[idx] = parts[idx].format_map({k: v})
return ''.join(parts)
# >>> partial_format('{foo} {bar:1.3f}', foo='FOO')
# 'FOO {bar:1.3f}'
# >>> partial_format('{foo} {bar:1.3f}', bar=1)
# '{foo} 1.000'
答案 11 :(得分:1)
我的建议如下(使用Python3.6测试):
class Lazymap(object):
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self.dict = kwargs
def __getitem__(self, key):
return self.dict.get(key, "".join(["{", key, "}"]))
s = '{foo} {bar}'
s.format_map(Lazymap(bar="FOO"))
# >>> '{foo} FOO'
s.format_map(Lazymap(bar="BAR"))
# >>> '{foo} BAR'
s.format_map(Lazymap(bar="BAR", foo="FOO", baz="BAZ"))
# >>> 'FOO BAR'
更新:
此处显示了一种更优雅的方法(子类dict
和重载__missing__(self, key)
):https://stackoverflow.com/a/17215533/333403
答案 12 :(得分:0)
TL;DR:问题:如果 defaultdict
未设置,{foobar[a]}
将失败 foobar
:
from collections import defaultdict
text = "{bar}, {foo}, {foobar[a]}" # {bar} is set, {foo} is "", {foobar[a]} fails
text.format_map(defaultdict(str, bar="A")) # TypeError: string indices must be integers
解决方案:从编辑复制DefaultWrapper
类,然后:
text = "{bar}, {foo}, {foobar[a]}"
text.format_map(DefaultWrapper(bar="A")) # "A, , " (missing replaced with empty str)
# Even this works:
foobar = {"c": "C"}
text = "{foobar[a]}, {foobar[c]}"
text.format_map(DefaultWrapper(foobar=foobar)) # ", C" missing indices are also replaced
请注意,索引和属性访问在已发布的解决方案之一中不起作用。以下代码引发 TypeError: string indices must be integers
.
from collections import defaultdict
text = "{foo} '{bar[index]}'"
text.format_map(defaultdict(str, foo="FOO")) # raises a TypeError
要解决此问题,可以将 collections.defaultdict
解决方案与支持索引的自定义默认值对象一起使用。 DefaultWrapper
对象在索引和属性访问时返回自身,允许无限次索引/使用属性而不会出错。
请注意,这可以扩展以允许包含部分请求值的容器。查看下面的编辑。
class DefaultWrapper:
def __repr__(self):
return "Empty default value"
def __str__(self):
return ""
def __format__(self, format_spec):
return ""
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self
def __getitem__(self, name):
return self
def __contains__(self, name):
return True
text = "'{foo}', '{bar[index][i]}'"
print(text.format_map(defaultdict(DefaultWrapper, foo="FOO")))
# 'FOO', ''
上述类可以扩展以支持部分填充的容器。所以例如
text = "'{foo[a]}', '{foo[b]}'"
foo = {"a": "A"}
print(text.format_map(defaultdict(DefaultWrapper, foo=foo)))
# KeyError: 'b'
这个想法是用 defaultdict
完全替换 DefaultWrapper
。 DefaultWrapper
对象环绕 container
返回容器请求的值(用 DefaultWrapper
对象包装)或容器作为字符串。这种方式模仿了地图的无限深度,但返回了所有当前值。
添加 kwargs
只是为了方便。这样看起来更像是 defaultdict
解决方案。
class DefaultWrapper:
"""A wrapper around the `container` to allow accessing with a default value."""
ignore_str_format_errors = True
def __init__(self, container="", **kwargs):
self.container = container
self.kwargs = kwargs
def __repr__(self):
return "DefaultWrapper around '{}'".format(repr(self.container))
def __str__(self):
return str(self.container)
def __format__(self, format_spec):
try:
return self.container.__format__(format_spec)
except TypeError as e:
if DefaultWrapper.ignore_str_format_errors or self.container == "":
return str(self)
else:
raise e
def __getattr__(self, name):
try:
return DefaultWrapper(getattr(self.container, name))
except AttributeError:
return DefaultWrapper()
def __getitem__(self, name):
try:
return DefaultWrapper(self.container[name])
except (TypeError, LookupError):
try:
return DefaultWrapper(self.kwargs[name])
except (TypeError, LookupError):
return DefaultWrapper()
def __contains__(self, name):
return True
现在所有显示的示例都没有错误:
text = "'{foo[a]}', '{foo[b]}'"
foo = {"a": "A"}
print(text.format_map(DefaultWrapper(foo=foo)))
# 'A', ''
text = "'{foo}', '{bar[index][i]}', '{foobar[a]}', '{foobar[b]}'"
print(text.format_map(DefaultWrapper(foo="Foo", foobar={"a": "A"})))
# 'FOO', '', 'A', ''
# the old way still works the same as before
from collections import defaultdict
text = "'{foo}', '{bar[index][i]}'"
print(text.format_map(defaultdict(DefaultWrapper, foo="FOO")))
# 'FOO', ''
答案 13 :(得分:0)
阅读@Sam Bourne评论,我修改了@SvenMarnach的code
可以在不编写自定义解析器的情况下正确使用强制(例如{a!s:>2s}
)。
基本思想不是转换为字符串,而是用强制标签将丢失的键连接起来。
import string
class MissingKey(object):
def __init__(self, key):
self.key = key
def __str__(self): # Supports {key!s}
return MissingKeyStr("".join([self.key, "!s"]))
def __repr__(self): # Supports {key!r}
return MissingKeyStr("".join([self.key, "!r"]))
def __format__(self, spec): # Supports {key:spec}
if spec:
return "".join(["{", self.key, ":", spec, "}"])
return "".join(["{", self.key, "}"])
def __getitem__(self, i): # Supports {key[i]}
return MissingKey("".join([self.key, "[", str(i), "]"]))
def __getattr__(self, name): # Supports {key.name}
return MissingKey("".join([self.key, ".", name]))
class MissingKeyStr(MissingKey, str):
def __init__(self, key):
if isinstance(key, MissingKey):
self.key = "".join([key.key, "!s"])
else:
self.key = key
class SafeFormatter(string.Formatter):
def __init__(self, default=lambda k: MissingKey(k)):
self.default=default
def get_value(self, key, args, kwds):
if isinstance(key, str):
return kwds.get(key, self.default(key))
else:
return super().get_value(key, args, kwds)
像这样使用(例如)
SafeFormatter().format("{a:<5} {b:<10}", a=10)
以下测试(受@ norok2的启发)在两种情况下根据上述类检查传统format_map
和safe_format_map
的输出:提供正确的关键字或不提供关键字。
def safe_format_map(text, source):
return SafeFormatter().format(text, **source)
test_texts = (
'{a} ', # simple nothing useful in source
'{a:5d}', # formatting
'{a!s}', # coercion
'{a!s:>{a}s}', # formatting and coercion
'{a:0{a}d}', # nesting
'{d[x]}', # indexing
'{d.values}', # member
)
source = dict(a=10,d=dict(x='FOO'))
funcs = [safe_format_map,
str.format_map
#safe_format_alt # Version based on parsing (See @norok2)
]
n = 18
for text in test_texts:
# full_source = {**dict(b='---', f=dict(g='Oh yes!')), **source}
# print('{:>{n}s} : OK : '.format('str.format_map', n=n) + text.format_map(full_source))
print("Testing:", text)
for func in funcs:
try:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : OK\t\t\t: ' + func(text, dict()))
except:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : FAILED')
try:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : OK\t\t\t: ' + func(text, source))
except:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : FAILED')
哪个输出
Testing: {a}
safe_format_map : OK : {a}
safe_format_map : OK : 10
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : 10
Testing: {a:5d}
safe_format_map : OK : {a:5d}
safe_format_map : OK : 10
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : 10
Testing: {a!s}
safe_format_map : OK : {a!s}
safe_format_map : OK : 10
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : 10
Testing: {a!s:>{a}s}
safe_format_map : OK : {a!s:>{a}s}
safe_format_map : OK : 10
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : 10
Testing: {a:0{a}d}
safe_format_map : OK : {a:0{a}d}
safe_format_map : OK : 0000000010
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : 0000000010
Testing: {d[x]}
safe_format_map : OK : {d[x]}
safe_format_map : OK : FOO
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : FOO
Testing: {d.values}
safe_format_map : OK : {d.values}
safe_format_map : OK : <built-in method values of dict object at 0x7fe61e230af8>
format_map : FAILED
format_map : OK : <built-in method values of dict object at 0x7fe61e230af8>
答案 14 :(得分:0)
答案 15 :(得分:0)
我喜欢@ sven-marnach的答案。我的答案只是它的扩展版本。它允许非关键字格式,并忽略多余的键。以下是用法示例(函数名称是对python 3.6 f字符串格式的引用):
# partial string substitution by keyword
>>> f('{foo} {bar}', foo="FOO")
'FOO {bar}'
# partial string substitution by argument
>>> f('{} {bar}', 1)
'1 {bar}'
>>> f('{foo} {}', 1)
'{foo} 1'
# partial string substitution with arguments and keyword mixed
>>> f('{foo} {} {bar} {}', '|', bar='BAR')
'{foo} | BAR {}'
# partial string substitution with extra keyword
>>> f('{foo} {bar}', foo="FOO", bro="BRO")
'FOO {bar}'
# you can simply 'pour out' your dictionary to format function
>>> kwargs = {'foo': 'FOO', 'bro': 'BRO'}
>>> f('{foo} {bar}', **kwargs)
'FOO {bar}'
这是我的代码:
from string import Formatter
class FormatTuple(tuple):
def __getitem__(self, key):
if key + 1 > len(self):
return "{}"
return tuple.__getitem__(self, key)
class FormatDict(dict):
def __missing__(self, key):
return "{" + key + "}"
def f(string, *args, **kwargs):
"""
String safe substitute format method.
If you pass extra keys they will be ignored.
If you pass incomplete substitute map, missing keys will be left unchanged.
:param string:
:param kwargs:
:return:
>>> f('{foo} {bar}', foo="FOO")
'FOO {bar}'
>>> f('{} {bar}', 1)
'1 {bar}'
>>> f('{foo} {}', 1)
'{foo} 1'
>>> f('{foo} {} {bar} {}', '|', bar='BAR')
'{foo} | BAR {}'
>>> f('{foo} {bar}', foo="FOO", bro="BRO")
'FOO {bar}'
"""
formatter = Formatter()
args_mapping = FormatTuple(args)
mapping = FormatDict(kwargs)
return formatter.vformat(string, args_mapping, mapping)
答案 16 :(得分:0)
如果您想解开字典以将参数传递给format
,as in this related question,则可以使用以下方法。
首先假定字符串s
与此问题相同:
s = '{foo} {bar}'
,值由以下字典给出:
replacements = {'foo': 'FOO'}
显然这行不通:
s.format(**replacements)
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#KeyError Traceback (most recent call last)
#<ipython-input-29-ef5e51de79bf> in <module>()
#----> 1 s.format(**replacements)
#
#KeyError: 'bar'
但是,您可以先get a set
of all of the named arguments from s
并创建一个字典,该字典将参数映射到用大括号括起来的自身:
from string import Formatter
args = {x[1]:'{'+x[1]+'}' for x in Formatter().parse(s)}
print(args)
#{'foo': '{foo}', 'bar': '{bar}'}
现在使用args
字典填写replacements
中缺少的键。对于python 3.5+,您可以do this in a single expression:
new_s = s.format(**{**args, **replacements}}
print(new_s)
#'FOO {bar}'
对于旧版本的python,您可以调用update
:
args.update(replacements)
print(s.format(**args))
#'FOO {bar}'
答案 17 :(得分:0)
在测试了here和there的最有希望的解决方案之后,我意识到它们没有真正满足以下要求:
str.format_map()
识别的模板语法; 因此,我编写了自己的解决方案,它满足了上述要求。 ( EDIT :现在,@ SvenMarnach的版本(如该答案中所述)似乎可以解决我所需要的一些极端情况。)
基本上,我最终解析了模板字符串,找到了匹配的嵌套{.*?}
组(使用find_all()
帮助函数),并使用{ {1}},同时捕捉到任何潜在的str.format_map()
。
KeyError
def find_all(
text,
pattern,
overlap=False):
"""
Find all occurrencies of the pattern in the text.
Args:
text (str|bytes|bytearray): The input text.
pattern (str|bytes|bytearray): The pattern to find.
overlap (bool): Detect overlapping patterns.
Yields:
position (int): The position of the next finding.
"""
len_text = len(text)
offset = 1 if overlap else (len(pattern) or 1)
i = 0
while i < len_text:
i = text.find(pattern, i)
if i >= 0:
yield i
i += offset
else:
break
def matching_delimiters(
text,
l_delim,
r_delim,
including=True):
"""
Find matching delimiters in a sequence.
The delimiters are matched according to nesting level.
Args:
text (str|bytes|bytearray): The input text.
l_delim (str|bytes|bytearray): The left delimiter.
r_delim (str|bytes|bytearray): The right delimiter.
including (bool): Include delimeters.
yields:
result (tuple[int]): The matching delimiters.
"""
l_offset = len(l_delim) if including else 0
r_offset = len(r_delim) if including else 0
stack = []
l_tokens = set(find_all(text, l_delim))
r_tokens = set(find_all(text, r_delim))
positions = l_tokens.union(r_tokens)
for pos in sorted(positions):
if pos in l_tokens:
stack.append(pos + 1)
elif pos in r_tokens:
if len(stack) > 0:
prev = stack.pop()
yield (prev - l_offset, pos + r_offset, len(stack))
else:
raise ValueError(
'Found `{}` unmatched right token(s) `{}` (position: {}).'
.format(len(r_tokens) - len(l_tokens), r_delim, pos))
if len(stack) > 0:
raise ValueError(
'Found `{}` unmatched left token(s) `{}` (position: {}).'
.format(
len(l_tokens) - len(r_tokens), l_delim, stack.pop() - 1))
(FlyingCircus中也提供此代码-免责声明:我是它的主要作者。)
此代码的用法为:
def safe_format_map(
text,
source):
"""
Perform safe string formatting from a mapping source.
If a value is missing from source, this is simply ignored, and no
`KeyError` is raised.
Args:
text (str): Text to format.
source (Mapping|None): The mapping to use as source.
If None, uses caller's `vars()`.
Returns:
result (str): The formatted text.
"""
stack = []
for i, j, depth in matching_delimiters(text, '{', '}'):
if depth == 0:
try:
replacing = text[i:j].format_map(source)
except KeyError:
pass
else:
stack.append((i, j, replacing))
result = ''
i, j = len(text), 0
while len(stack) > 0:
last_i = i
i, j, replacing = stack.pop()
result = replacing + text[j:last_i] + result
if i > 0:
result = text[0:i] + result
return result
让我们将其与我最喜欢的解决方案(由@SvenMarnach共享他的代码here和there进行比较)
print(safe_format_map('{a} {b} {c}', dict(a=-A-)))
# -A- {b} {c}
以下是一些测试:
import string
class FormatPlaceholder:
def __init__(self, key):
self.key = key
def __format__(self, spec):
result = self.key
if spec:
result += ":" + spec
return "{" + result + "}"
def __getitem__(self, index):
self.key = "{}[{}]".format(self.key, index)
return self
def __getattr__(self, attr):
self.key = "{}.{}".format(self.key, attr)
return self
class FormatDict(dict):
def __missing__(self, key):
return FormatPlaceholder(key)
def safe_format_alt(text, source):
formatter = string.Formatter()
return formatter.vformat(text, (), FormatDict(source))
以及使其运行的代码:
test_texts = (
'{b} {f}', # simple nothing useful in source
'{a} {b}', # simple
'{a} {b} {c:5d}', # formatting
'{a} {b} {c!s}', # coercion
'{a} {b} {c!s:>{a}s}', # formatting and coercion
'{a} {b} {c:0{a}d}', # nesting
'{a} {b} {d[x]}', # dicts (existing in source)
'{a} {b} {e.index}', # class (existing in source)
'{a} {b} {f[g]}', # dict (not existing in source)
'{a} {b} {f.values}', # class (not existing in source)
)
source = dict(a=4, c=101, d=dict(x='FOO'), e=[])
导致:
funcs = safe_format_map, safe_format_alt
n = 18
for text in test_texts:
full_source = {**dict(b='---', f=dict(g='Oh yes!')), **source}
print('{:>{n}s} : OK : '.format('str.format_map', n=n) + text.format_map(full_source))
for func in funcs:
try:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : OK : ' + func(text, source))
except:
print(f'{func.__name__:>{n}s} : FAILED : {text}')
如您所见,更新的版本现在似乎可以很好地处理早期版本曾经失败的特殊情况。
时间上,它们大约在彼此的50%,取决于要格式化的实际 str.format_map : OK : --- {'g': 'Oh yes!'}
safe_format_map : OK : {b} {f}
safe_format_alt : OK : {b} {f}
str.format_map : OK : 4 ---
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b}
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b}
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- 101
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} 101
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} 101
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- 101
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} 101
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} 101
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- 101
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} 101
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} 101
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- 0101
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} 0101
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} 0101
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- FOO
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} FOO
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} FOO
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- <built-in method index of list object at 0x7f7a485666c8>
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} <built-in method index of list object at 0x7f7a485666c8>
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} <built-in method index of list object at 0x7f7a485666c8>
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- Oh yes!
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} {f[g]}
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} {f[g]}
str.format_map : OK : 4 --- <built-in method values of dict object at 0x7f7a485da090>
safe_format_map : OK : 4 {b} {f.values}
safe_format_alt : OK : 4 {b} {f.values}
(可能还有实际的text
),但是source
在我执行的大多数测试中似乎都占有优势(无论它们当然是这样):
safe_format_map()
for text in test_texts:
print(f' {text}')
%timeit safe_format(text * 1000, source)
%timeit safe_format_alt(text * 1000, source)
答案 18 :(得分:0)
一个非常丑陋但最简单的解决方案就是:
tmpl = '{foo}, {bar}'
tmpl.replace('{bar}', 'BAR')
Out[3]: '{foo}, BAR'
通过这种方式,您仍然可以将tmpl
用作常规模板,并仅在需要时执行部分格式设置。我觉得这个问题太过微不足道,无法使用像Mohan Raj那样的过度解决方案。
答案 19 :(得分:0)
假设你没有使用该字符串直到完全填写完毕,你可以做类似这样的事情:
class IncrementalFormatting:
def __init__(self, string):
self._args = []
self._kwargs = {}
self._string = string
def add(self, *args, **kwargs):
self._args.extend(args)
self._kwargs.update(kwargs)
def get(self):
return self._string.format(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
示例:
template = '#{a}:{}/{}?{c}'
message = IncrementalFormatting(template)
message.add('abc')
message.add('xyz', a=24)
message.add(c='lmno')
assert message.get() == '#24:abc/xyz?lmno'
答案 20 :(得分:0)
还有一种方法可以实现这一点,即使用format
和%
替换变量。例如:
>>> s = '{foo} %(bar)s'
>>> s = s.format(foo='my_foo')
>>> s
'my_foo %(bar)s'
>>> s % {'bar': 'my_bar'}
'my_foo my_bar'
答案 21 :(得分:-1)
你可以将它包装在一个带默认参数的函数中:
def print_foo_bar(foo='', bar=''):
s = '{foo} {bar}'
return s.format(foo=foo, bar=bar)
print_foo_bar(bar='BAR') # ' BAR'