假设我有下表:
Value Time
0 15/06/2012 8:03:43 PM
1 15/06/2012 8:03:43 PM *
1 15/06/2012 8:03:48 PM
1 15/06/2012 8:03:53 PM
1 15/06/2012 8:03:58 PM
2 15/06/2012 8:04:03 PM *
2 15/06/2012 8:04:08 PM
3 15/06/2012 8:04:13 PM *
3 15/06/2012 8:04:18 PM
3 15/06/2012 8:04:23 PM
2 15/06/2012 8:04:28 PM *
2 15/06/2012 8:04:33 PM
如何选择已加星标的行,即Value
已更改的位置?基本上我正在尝试找到Value
已更改的时间,因此我可以根据这些时间间隔进行其他查询。解决方案不应该依赖于提前了解Value
或Time
。
在我看来,这应该不是很难(但显然对我来说很难!)。
我目前正在使用SQL Server 2008,但如果新窗口/分析功能有用,我可以访问2012.
我尝试在http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/11/24/sql-server-solution-to-puzzle-simulate-lead-and-lag-without-using-sql-server-2012-analytic-function/调整解决方案,但一小时后我的查询没有完成!我认为连接会将行大小分解为无法管理的(或者我搞砸了)。
我可以使用C#代码和多个db调用解决这个问题,但似乎可以在表值函数或SP中完成,这样可以更好。
此外,如果更容易,只有增加Value
的解决方案才行。
答案 0 :(得分:31)
我认为这就是你所追求的:
;WITH x AS
(
SELECT value, time, rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(PARTITION BY Value ORDER BY Time)
FROM dbo.table
)
SELECT * FROM x WHERE rn = 1;
如果结果集很大并且没有良好的支持索引,这可能会很慢......
修改强>
啊,等一下,价值观上涨和下跌,而不仅仅是......如果是这种情况你可以尝试这么慢的方法:
DECLARE @x TABLE(value INT, [time] DATETIME)
INSERT @x VALUES
(0,'20120615 8:03:43 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:43 PM'),--*
(1,'20120615 8:03:48 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:53 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:58 PM'),--
(2,'20120615 8:04:03 PM'),--*
(2,'20120615 8:04:08 PM'),--
(3,'20120615 8:04:13 PM'),--*
(3,'20120615 8:04:18 PM'),--
(3,'20120615 8:04:23 PM'),--
(2,'20120615 8:04:28 PM'),--*
(2,'20120615 8:04:33 PM');
;WITH x AS
(
SELECT *, rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY time)
FROM @x
)
SELECT x.value, x.[time]
FROM x LEFT OUTER JOIN x AS y
ON x.rn = y.rn + 1
AND x.value <> y.value
WHERE y.value IS NOT NULL;
结果:
value time
----- -----------------------
1 2012-06-15 20:03:43.000
2 2012-06-15 20:04:03.000
3 2012-06-15 20:04:13.000
2 2012-06-15 20:04:28.000
答案 1 :(得分:12)
DECLARE @x TABLE(value INT, [time] DATETIME)
INSERT @x VALUES
(0,'20120615 8:03:43 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:43 PM'),--*
(1,'20120615 8:03:48 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:53 PM'),--
(1,'20120615 8:03:58 PM'),--
(2,'20120615 8:04:03 PM'),--*
(2,'20120615 8:04:08 PM'),--
(3,'20120615 8:04:13 PM'),--*
(3,'20120615 8:04:18 PM'),--
(3,'20120615 8:04:23 PM'),--
(2,'20120615 8:04:28 PM'),--*
(2,'20120615 8:04:33 PM');
; with temp as
(
SELECT
value, [time], lag(value,1,-1) over (order by [time] ) as lastValue
FROM @x
)
SELECT
[value],[time]
FROM
temp
WHERE value <> lastValue
结果:
value time
---------------------------
0 2012-06-15 20:03:43.000
1 2012-06-15 20:03:43.000
2 2012-06-15 20:04:03.000
3 2012-06-15 20:04:13.000
2 2012-06-15 20:04:28.000
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我们也可以使用子查询
来做到这一点SELECT sub1.value, sub1.time FROM
(SELECT *,rn,id FROM
(SELECT *,row_number() over (partition by value order by time) AS rn, row_number() over (order by time) AS id FROM x ) order by time) sub1
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(SELECT *,rn,id FROM
(SELECT *,row_number() over (partition by value order by time) AS rn, row_number() over (order by time) AS id FROM x ) order by time) sub2
ON sub1.id = sub2.id + 1
WHERE sub1.rn - sub2.rn <> 1 OR sub2.rn IS NULL;
所以,我比较了2行的值,如果它改变了,那么rn的差值将不等于1,否则rn值将增加1所以,我选择了与下一行的rn值不同的所有行不是1和sub2.rn IS NULL用于第一行,因为连接将从id = 2开始。