我有两个清单:
a. requestedAmenities b. units with amenities.
我想过滤那些有“任务设施”的单位。
我试图使用foreach
循环实现相同的结果,但我相信使用LINQ会更容易。有人可以帮忙\建议吗?
UnitAmenities unitSearchRequestAmenities = unitSearchRequest.Amenities;
var exactMatchApartmentsFilteredByAmenities= new Units();
IEnumerable<string> requestAmenitiesIds = unitSearchRequestAmenities.Select(element => element.ID);
foreach (var unitCounter in ExactMatchApartments)
{
IEnumerable<string> unitAmenities = unitCounter.Amenities.Select(element => element.ID);
foreach (var requestAmenityId in requestAmenitiesIds)
{
foreach (var unitAmenity in unitAmenities)
{
if (requestAmenityId == unitAmenity)
{
exactMatchApartmentsFilteredByAmenities.Add(unitCounter);
//break to the outmost foreach loop
}
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您可以根据符合相交规则
进行过滤var matchedAmenities = ExactMatchApartments.Where(ema => ema.Amenities
.Any(x => unitSearchRequestAmenities
.Count(y => y.ID == x.ID) == 1));
exactMatchApartmentsFilteredByAmenities.AddRange(matchedAmenities);
这是一个有点“自定义”Intersect
,因为默认的LINQ Intersect
扩展名不支持lambda表达式。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
很难从你的类型中分辨出来,但我认为以下应该可以解决这个问题
from unit in ExactMatchApartments
from amenity in unit.Amenities
join requestedAmenity in unitSearchRequestAmenities
on amenity.ID equals requestedAmenity.ID
select unit
与点符号相比,这种情况下查询表达式更容易阅读和理解。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
感谢Jason,我相信它必须是Intersect而不是Except。我已将代码更改为以下内容:
var amenities = unitSearchRequest.Amenities;
if (amenities.Count > 0)
{
//filter the unit's amenities's id's with the search request amenities's ID's.
var exactMatchApartmentsFilteredByAmenities= new Units();
var requestAmenitiesIds = amenities.Select(element => element.ID);
foreach (var unitCounter in ExactMatchApartments)
{
var unitAmenities = unitCounter.Amenities.Select(element => element.ID);
var intersect =unitAmenities.Intersect(requestAmenitiesIds);
if (intersect.Any())
{
exactMatchApartmentsFilteredByAmenities.Add(unitCounter);
break;
}
}
}
我将测试代码并在此处更新我的结果。