我试图模拟一对一的关系。当我尝试添加nullable = false时,
在join column属性中,我得到一个SQLIntegrityContraintViolationException,表示地址ID为null。我期待这个,因为我在id中使用的自动生成的值是在提交时生成的。 (我是对的吗?)......
但是,当我在地址构造函数中进行修改时,通过在那里设置id然后尝试继续...我得到了相同的异常。我不明白为什么。
但是,如果我删除了nullable = false,我可以正常执行它。请解释我哪里出错了。
这是我的实现..为了简单起见,省略了Getters和Setter。
@Entity
public class CustomerEX implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
private String name;
@OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY,cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
@JoinColumn(name="address_fk")
private AddressEx address;
public void setAddress(AddressEx address) {
this.address = address;
this.address.setCustomer(this);
}
---
----
}
and
@Entity
public class AddressEx implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String city;
private String country;
@OneToOne
private CustomerEX customer;
}
我的主要功能就像......
public class CustomerTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
AddressEx addr = new AddressEx();
addr.setCity("Bangalore");
addr.setCountry("India");
System.out.println(addr.getId()+ " is the id of this object");
CustomerEX cust = new CustomerEX();
cust.setName("ravi");
cust.setAddress(addr);
EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("PersistenceAppPU");
EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager();
EntityTransaction etx = em.getTransaction();
etx.begin();
em.persist(cust);
etx.commit();
}
}
我哪里错了?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您应该将持久操作从客户级地址级联到地址。 您正在保存客户,但该地址尚未生成ID,因为它已生成